Why does Rodgers keep saying the anfield pitch is wank? Is he trying to get someone fired?
Because it is. They're changing it after the season ends.
Why does Rodgers keep saying the anfield pitch is wank? Is he trying to get someone fired?
Sorry don't agree FFF. Someone's failing (or in this case a team) doesn't mean that their opponent deserves anything by default .... it just so happens they escaped and get a replay. I find it extremely frustrating when commentators suggest a team deserved their win, or draw, when quite clearly they were inferior however Lady Luck intervened and events went their way.
There were ties in the EC when our fans said the same thing .. we maybe didn't deserve to win the tie but .. hey ho and on we go !
As much as I there's not much to disagree with rationally about your post Mark, footy is an emotive game hence we all want to be invested in a club that entertains and excites.
I can't stand clubs that go out for 90 mins intending not-to-lose rather than win a game, effective or not. I don't think they 'deserve' the draw as much as the team that actually visibly intended to score and took the necessary risks to do so.
I thought it was a good performance with many encouraging signs (Markovic, Can etc) I don't really like focusing on negatives but Sakho really was a worry. He might be able to attack the ball with gusto in the air but on the deck he's fucking shocking and a massive liability. Slow, indecisive and every pass he makes looks laboured. Gary Mac commented on it a few times during commentary. I suppose a clean sheet means that it will get overlooked. Did anyone else think the same?
Normally agree with most of what you have to say Red, but I thought Sakho was excellent yesterday. He may look ungainly but his defending and passing were top rate IMO.
Exactly. We won a European cup a few years back on the back of a few performances like that, & don't anyone dare say we didn't deserve that.They didn't deserve a draw. They earned it. I have no problem with a team being well drilled and shutting out the opposition
Of course it does, you've got to consider the respective talent of both sides and what they set out to do. We set ourselves up as very attacking, with a talented front three. They set themselves up to compress the space around their defense and to frustrate us. Who's gameplan worked? Stats are bollocks, we didn't open them up as such, we were left frustrated by a tactical setup that worked.
Of course they deserve the draw. By that reckoning, you may aswell say Cambridge didn't deserve theirs, because possession percentages and the respective teamsheets say so.
Their idea was to either get a draw and drag us back to their place, or to nick a goal. They got way they came for, regardless of whether they showed attacking ambition.
It was, but once again his awkwardness nearly cost him, the back pass he played to Mignolet under pressure would have been punished against a quicker forward. His passing when bringing the ball out is top notch, he picks holes through the centre of midfield with great precision, but he looks like a disaster waiting to happen when under pressure.
I'm likely quiffing, but has anyone mentioned well well Mignolet played again yesterday. That's about 4 games running now that he's looked like a commanding keeper with half-decent feet, aligned to his usual excellent shot-stopping.
Might it just be that he's responding to his recent woes with real courage and progress?
If you believe that he's worthy money or indeed earns the money we pay him, then that's your right. I disagree and I think most of the time he is a shithouse in the tackle.haters don't need to hate (all the time).
I thought it was a good performance with many encouraging signs (Markovic, Can etc) I don't really like focusing on negatives but Sakho really was a worry. He might be able to attack the ball with gusto in the air but on the deck he's fucking shocking and a massive liability. Slow, indecisive and every pass he makes looks laboured. Gary Mac commented on it a few times during commentary. I suppose a clean sheet means that it will get overlooked. Did anyone else think the same?
I'm likely quiffing, but has anyone mentioned well well Mignolet played again yesterday. That's about 4 games running now that he's looked like a commanding keeper with half-decent feet, aligned to his usual excellent shot-stopping.
Might it just be that he's responding to his recent woes with real courage and progress?
Of course I do really want him to be a boss in the box - There were many occasions yesterday where he seemed so laboured when passing though. Admittedly he didn't do too much wrong. He just looks a liability. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.You clearly are too affected by appearance. Substance over style my man. He's the best CB we have and one of the better ones in the league.
Of course I do really want him to be a boss in the box - There were many occasions yesterday where he seemed so laboured when passing though. Admittedly he didn't do too much wrong. He just looks a liability. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
It was, but once again his awkwardness nearly cost him, the back pass he played to Mignolet under pressure would have been punished against a quicker forward. His passing when bringing the ball out is top notch, he picks holes through the centre of midfield with great precision, but he looks like a disaster waiting to happen when under pressure.
Palace away if we beat Bolton.