Roy Hodgson

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=40525.msg1248756#msg1248756 date=1294670652]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=40525.msg1248745#msg1248745 date=1294670150]
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=40525.msg1248740#msg1248740 date=1294669918]
well i wasn't. sorry for any confusion.
[/quote]

The confusion may have been due to you responding to Delinquent's post
[/quote]

arrrgh, is it really so obscure?

aquaman made a laughably obsequious post about you. i wanted to mock that obsequiousness and so responded to the next available post in terms so sycophantic that it should've been obvious that a) i wasn't being serious and b) given that aquaman had just made a post that was so incredibly fawning that other posters would be likely to be on alert for posts mocking/criticising that very quality.

again, sorry if that was confusing.
[/quote]
It's getting worser the more you try to explain .Give it a rest son you will get over it i promise you.
 
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=40525.msg1248756#msg1248756 date=1294670652]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=40525.msg1248745#msg1248745 date=1294670150]
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=40525.msg1248740#msg1248740 date=1294669918]
well i wasn't. sorry for any confusion.
[/quote]

The confusion may have been due to you responding to Delinquent's post
[/quote]

arrrgh, is it really so obscure?

aquaman made a laughably obsequious post about you. i wanted to mock that obsequiousness and so responded to the next available post in terms so sycophantic that it should've been obvious that a) i wasn't being serious and b) given that aquaman had just made a post that was so incredibly fawning that other posters would be likely to be on alert for posts mocking/criticising that very quality.

again, sorry if that was confusing.
[/quote]

Oh dear.

So to sum up: confusing, not that funny and also poorly delivered.
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=40525.msg1248762#msg1248762 date=1294670996]
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=40525.msg1248756#msg1248756 date=1294670652]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=40525.msg1248745#msg1248745 date=1294670150]
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=40525.msg1248740#msg1248740 date=1294669918]
well i wasn't. sorry for any confusion.
[/quote]

The confusion may have been due to you responding to Delinquent's post
[/quote]

arrrgh, is it really so obscure?

aquaman made a laughably obsequious post about you. i wanted to mock that obsequiousness and so responded to the next available post in terms so sycophantic that it should've been obvious that a) i wasn't being serious and b) given that aquaman had just made a post that was so incredibly fawning that other posters would be likely to be on alert for posts mocking/criticising that very quality.

again, sorry if that was confusing.
[/quote]

Oh dear.

So to sum up: confusing, not that funny and also poorly delivered.
[/quote]

i wish you'd shown me some mercy.
 
And I'm sick reading about "poor Hodgson". He gets big payoff for doing a terrible job and damaging one the biggest football clubs in the world. The only way to pair "poor" and "Hodgson" in the same sentence is "Hodgson did a poor job at LFC." - Aldo

:laugh:
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=40525.msg1248572#msg1248572 date=1294663506]
*bump*

now that we are wise to the event, the first couple of pages makes for hilarious reading 🙂
[/quote]

What you meant to post was....

"See I was right all along"

😉

To be fair there are couple of people who got it wrong about Hodgson'sappointment.
 
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=40525.msg1250499#msg1250499 date=1294851139]
*creeps out of thread*
[/quote]

*grabs pitchfork whilst holding head up high*

Burn the witch!!!
 
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=40525.msg1115798#msg1115798 date=1276025256]
Indeed.

Woycorpse or Abu Dhabi billions? I'll take the latter.
[/quote]

Does this mean I was the first to call him a name?

A dubious honour indeed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom