[article]There is a myth that attacking merely means throwing players forward, creating chances and taking lots of shots. But it’s as much about what you do without the ball as with it, and do in your own half as much as the opposition’s. Without sounding too wanky, it’s about playing active football rather than passive football.
This is where Liverpool have improved most under Klopp. They were capable of breathtaking attacking play under Brendan Rodgers, but in too many games (including some big ones) were passive, particularly after falling behind.
Sky Sports got rid of their ‘Player Cam’, but the next time you watch Liverpool keep your eye on Roberto Firmino for five minutes. The amount of ground he covers is obviously ridiculous, but it is his ability to never be more than five yards away when an opposition player gets into trouble in his own half that astounds. It is no coincidence that teams defend badly against Liverpool – that phrasing fails to give them enough credit. Liverpool and Firmino make you defend badly.
It’s also why it went wrong after Ragnar Klavan’s introduction (more on that later). Liverpool switched from active to passive, and Roma sensed a sniff of a chance.[/article]
[article] I don’t want to feel like I’m piling on him, but Lovren was also at fault for a Roma goal. Milner was the unfortunate scorer of the own goal, the ball cannoning off his face and past Karius like a two-man Chris Brass special, but it was Lovren’s doing.
It is a small thing, but as a young defender you are taught to clear the ball out to the sides rather than up the centre of the pitch.
That’s for three reasons:
1) It avoids you doing something like kicking the ball in the face of a teammate or opponent, who is more likely to be in the centre of the penalty area than out wide. And if they are out wide the ball is less likely to rebound into your own goal.
2) If you scuff the clearance, the worst that will happen is that a cross can come into the box, rather than it setting up an opponent for a shot in front of goal.
3) If you connect with the ball, it might send a winger or wide forward down the channel. They are more likely to find space down the wings than the centre of the pitch.
It did not matter, but Lovren will know that he stuffed up. Onwards and upwards.[/article]
[article]If Klopp learned one thing in Rome, it is that bringing on defenders for attackers when defending a lead can often be a false economy. Having provided a threat on the counter attack all night, Klavan came on for Mane after 75 minutes and Liverpool immediately sat deeper. That invited the pressure that led to Roma making the tie semi-interesting.
The strategy seems logical but rarely proves so. Not only does the extra central defender cause a team to psychology go into their shell and invite pressure, it can also cause defensive unease due to the extra body and therefore change of shape. If Mane was indeed tired, Klopp might have been better bringing on Woodburn or Ings and telling them to harry and hassle like men possessed, even if they did it 40 yards from their own goal.
Roma had 24 shots on Wednesday evening. A quarter of those came between the 78th and 90th minute of the match, when Klavan was on to supposedly tighten things up. It doesn’t work.[/article]
[article]Finally, a plea. Over the last 18 months, the Premier League has become the home of manufactured crisis. Assisted by a media desperate for traffic and so keen to find controversy where none exists, managers of every top-six club have faced serious questions about their future. Sometimes these questions have been justified, but sometimes not.
In August, Guardiola was told that he would have to change to meet the demands of the Premier League and could not hope to dominate as he had done before. He has made those assessments look very silly indeed.
In October, Klopp’s own job was being called into question after Liverpool went four games without a win. In January (yes, this January), The S** ran the headline ‘Liverpool boss Jurgen Klopp could be sacked if he doesn’t deliver trophies soon’.
“We are not the biggest difference from the top teams right now, even if it looks – from the points – a little bit different,” Klopp responded when asked in a press conference about being sacked.
“If I was to come in today as a new manager – this would be the situation – and everyone would give me time now to do the next step, that would be perfect. Unfortunately, if they sack me now, I don’t think there are a lot of managers who would do the job better than I do. I don’t think I’m perfect, but it’s quite difficult to find better options.” Such a statement of the bleeding obvious should not need to have been made.
Less than five months later, Klopp has his team in the Champions League final. We are very quick to accuse football clubs and their owners of lacking patience, but some making that accusation are themselves guilty of passing judgement too quickly.
Klopp spent seven years at Mainz and seven years at Dortmund; he intends to spend at least seven years at Anfield. In that time there will be peaks and troughs, but none need push Liverpool or their manager off course. Forget the manufactured crisis, and focus on the bigger picture: Klopp is overachieving, and so are Liverpool. Now bring on this magnificent final…[/article]