It's probably time to nail this tiresome canard, unless your idea of 'a fair few' is radically different from most people's. And I repeat - ignore me and I'm happy to ignore you. But it's a two way thing, and your comment seems to suggest you'll happily carry on responding to me with your witless remarks. So ignore me and I'll ignore you. I won't say it again. (And mods, maybe you should note that.)
See Ramsey, wilshere, Walcott, akpom, iwobi, bellerin (he's not very good at all)It's quite an indictment of Wenger's increasingly aloof approach to management that six years of so-called coaching has limited the player to this. I actually wanted us to sign him when he was a 17 year old at Southampton - he looked a fine prospect, with just the kind of pace, directness and dynamism that we needed at that time - but it's sad to see how little of that potential has been realised. And for someone who's been mainly used in a position that requires a degree of defensive discipline as well as attacking prowess, he actually seems to have not only learnt little but also, in these past couple of years, started to forget it, or just given up. How much of that is down to the general malaise at Arsenal, where lots of good players seem to have declined, and how much is down to him, remains to be seen. It's a good sign that he's rejected more lucrative deals to come here, and he seems to know he needs to basically re-boot his career, but he certainly needs to be coached now, and rigorously. As I said before, I'm hopeful that Klopp will improve him significantly, but my goodness he looked really flat last night. The work starts now.
I think it's a worthy gamble really. He's got pace, skill, he can put in a good delivery, the big question mark over him (quite similar to Sterling) is his lack of end product and consistency in the final third.
It's a terrible reflection on Wenger that a player with so much raw ability, who has had more than his fair share of regular top level football, can be so lacking when it comes to decision making. For a manager who used to pride himself on patient but intuitive play, he's let this lad fall by the wayside really and not develop nearly as much as he could have.
It might be harsh pinning that on the manager, but he's repeatedly picked him, yet completely failed to iron out the differences between him being a potentially great player and another could have been/should have been.
He's entering an age gap where he really has to develop and brush up on his flaws, because if he doesn't make it here he'll be at a midtable club soon enough. If anyone can instill the qualities he lacks, it's Klopp. He's harnessed much more intelligence from Can, Lallana and a few others than they had shown previously. Perhaps he can do the same with Oxlade-Chamberlain, but in this side with so much decisiveness and quality in the final third, he has to learn fast.
The truth lies somewhere in the middle, he's never going to be a world beater, but he can clearly improve, and I believe he will under Klopp, he'll never be good enough to be one of the first names on the team sheet though.It's a bit too easy and convenient to apportion all of the blame on Wenger. Has Oxlade-Chamberlain got nothing to do with it?
He's scored 9 goals in 6 seasons. NINE fucking goals in his ENTIRE Premiership career. That's embarrassing, I don't care who your fucking manager is.
The truth lies somewhere in the middle, he's never going to be a world beater, but he can clearly improve, and I believe he will under Klopp, he'll never be good enough to be one of the first names on the team sheet though.
Why assume that he can clearly improve ?
Shouldn't have to hope a £40m purchase comes good at some point
His problems for England over the past two matches and the Scotland game before that were all personal - sloppy, poor passing , shit Tracking back, selfish. I've only seen Arsenal against us and and against Munich last season in the past 12 months , on each occasion he was also bollocks
I hope he's a good player and I've got it wrong but I've seen nothing so far to suggest that
He's good enough for the bench now when you consider he's replacing Origi and Woodburn.Seems a lot of money and effort for a player who could improve enough to eventually be on the bench.
He's good enough for the bench now when you consider he's replacing Origi and Woodburn.
No, i'm not judging him by his price, it's not even up for debate we overpaid for him, is it? Just trying to view the positives on the deal, he could go on to grow into a better player than he was at Arsenal, but currently he's a good squad player who improves the team.He cost nearly as much as Salah. Seems a bit weird if that's the height of your expectations.
What does a tiresome duck have anything to do with this?
The truth lies somewhere in the middle, he's never going to be a world beater, but he can clearly improve, and I believe he will under Klopp, he'll never be good enough to be one of the first names on the team sheet though.
He cost nearly as much as Salah. Seems a bit weird if that's the height of your expectations.
If anything this is proof that we got Salah for a steal in this window just gone.
Personally I'll wish him the best and of course hope he does well. I do think he fits into my player category of 'Merde Sac' though - Basically a shit bag but with a whiff of class about him. We'll see I guess.