Mr. Rightside
- Thread starter ILD
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
[quote author=ILD link=topic=41616.msg1163112#msg1163112 date=1282850437]
Roy needs to give Glenjo a go a RW with Kelly in behind him at RB. West Brom on Sunday is the perfect opportunity to try this out.
Is Johnson at RW a pipe dream or a genuine option?
[/quote]
I'd be willing to put fucking plessis on right wing as long as kuyt isnt there
Roy needs to give Glenjo a go a RW with Kelly in behind him at RB. West Brom on Sunday is the perfect opportunity to try this out.
Is Johnson at RW a pipe dream or a genuine option?
[/quote]
I'd be willing to put fucking plessis on right wing as long as kuyt isnt there
I've been saying this for months on end. He gives us width, he can shoot with both feet and can put a great cross in. Its a no brainer and it also means if we don't get another striker we can put Kuyt in the striker role - actually that could be an argument against it!
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163120#msg1163120 date=1282850579]
[quote author=ILD link=topic=41616.msg1163112#msg1163112 date=1282850437]
Roy needs to give Glenjo a go a RW with Kelly in behind him at RB. West Brom on Sunday is the perfect opportunity to try this out.
Is Johnson at RW a pipe dream or a genuine option?
[/quote]
I'd be willing to put fucking plessis on right wing as long as kuyt isnt there
[/quote]
Hey leave Dirk alone!
[quote author=ILD link=topic=41616.msg1163112#msg1163112 date=1282850437]
Roy needs to give Glenjo a go a RW with Kelly in behind him at RB. West Brom on Sunday is the perfect opportunity to try this out.
Is Johnson at RW a pipe dream or a genuine option?
[/quote]
I'd be willing to put fucking plessis on right wing as long as kuyt isnt there
[/quote]
Hey leave Dirk alone!
I don't agree with the idea of pushing Magic forward. He knows the RB position, and playing RW is very different. It ain't broke, so don't "fix" it.
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=41616.msg1163132#msg1163132 date=1282850788]
I don't agree with the idea of pushing Magic forward. He knows the RB position, and playing RW is very different. It ain't broke, so don't "fix" it.
[/quote]
Agreed
I don't agree with the idea of pushing Magic forward. He knows the RB position, and playing RW is very different. It ain't broke, so don't "fix" it.
[/quote]
Agreed
Magic is a right-back
The End
The End
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163138#msg1163138 date=1282850980]
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
Lechacal> can't defend? That's very harsh
I shouldn't bother. All he wants to do is find another stick to beat Rafa with.
He defended really well against Arsenal (I think?). Certainly some game recently.
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=41616.msg1163132#msg1163132 date=1282850788]
I don't agree with the idea of pushing Magic forward. He knows the RB position, and playing RW is very different. It ain't broke, so don't "fix" it.
[/quote]
What is so different ? Anyone can play on the wing, it's not rocket science.
He can't defend well, pushing him forward takes that pressure off him and gives him more licence to use the good parts of his game.
It makes perfect sense.
I don't agree with the idea of pushing Magic forward. He knows the RB position, and playing RW is very different. It ain't broke, so don't "fix" it.
[/quote]
What is so different ? Anyone can play on the wing, it's not rocket science.
He can't defend well, pushing him forward takes that pressure off him and gives him more licence to use the good parts of his game.
It makes perfect sense.
Yes, he was poor against Shitty. But everyone was, bar Gerrard.
I think Magic is a very good player
I think Magic is a very good player
Ross, the whole mindset is different. At RB attacking is a useful extra, at RW it's the whole point. Far more often than not RW gets the ball from behind him rather than being able to run on to it. These sorts of switches rarely, if ever, work for just those reasons.
Besides, Magic's defensive play isn't THAT bad. The idea that it is is a myth peddled by the media and it continually amazes me that so many Reds fall for it.
Besides, Magic's defensive play isn't THAT bad. The idea that it is is a myth peddled by the media and it continually amazes me that so many Reds fall for it.
Yes, but he's not a VERY good defender. The option of playing him on the wing must be examined.
There's not that many right backs that are good both attacking and defending. Generally they're great at one but not so much the other. I'm not sure why Johnson gets so much attention on the matter.
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=41616.msg1163163#msg1163163 date=1282851800]
Ross, the whole mindset is different. At RB attacking is a useful extra, at RW it's the whole point. Far more often than not RW gets the ball from behind him rather than being able to run on to it. These sorts of switches rarely, if ever, work for just those reasons.
Besides, Magic's defensive play isn't THAT bad. The idea that it is is a myth peddled by the media and it continually amazes me that so many Reds fall for it.
[/quote]
I've watched about 98% of his games for us. He isn't a good defender.
Ross, the whole mindset is different. At RB attacking is a useful extra, at RW it's the whole point. Far more often than not RW gets the ball from behind him rather than being able to run on to it. These sorts of switches rarely, if ever, work for just those reasons.
Besides, Magic's defensive play isn't THAT bad. The idea that it is is a myth peddled by the media and it continually amazes me that so many Reds fall for it.
[/quote]
I've watched about 98% of his games for us. He isn't a good defender.
[quote author=Stulikesdrums link=topic=41616.msg1163165#msg1163165 date=1282851861]
Yes, but he's not a VERY good defender. The option of playing him on the wing must be examined.
[/quote]
If it works that'll be a first in my experience, which stretches back much further than I care to thnk about.
Yes, but he's not a VERY good defender. The option of playing him on the wing must be examined.
[/quote]
If it works that'll be a first in my experience, which stretches back much further than I care to thnk about.
[quote author=JimmyK link=topic=41616.msg1163146#msg1163146 date=1282851282]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163138#msg1163138 date=1282850980]
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
[/quote]
It's an issue but not a major one, as Cole could play behind. Gerrard and a.n. other in a marauding midfield, poulson (although I pray defour or lass) holding. Wing backs can bomb up with the 4 defensive players left. Only prob is opposition wingers who play high on the counter
Reina
Carra Skrtel Agger
Johnson Poulson Aurelio
Gerrard Jonjo
Cole
Torres
Bam
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163138#msg1163138 date=1282850980]
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
[/quote]
It's an issue but not a major one, as Cole could play behind. Gerrard and a.n. other in a marauding midfield, poulson (although I pray defour or lass) holding. Wing backs can bomb up with the 4 defensive players left. Only prob is opposition wingers who play high on the counter
Reina
Carra Skrtel Agger
Johnson Poulson Aurelio
Gerrard Jonjo
Cole
Torres
Bam
Ha. I suppose there is no stand out example JJ but Johnson's power and pace must stand him as a good chance as anyone. I think he could be an 'explosive' RW.
That's twice you've used BAM in this thread Fabio. Just saying.
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163183#msg1163183 date=1282852452]
[quote author=JimmyK link=topic=41616.msg1163146#msg1163146 date=1282851282]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163138#msg1163138 date=1282850980]
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
[/quote]
It's an issue but not a major one, as Cole could play behind. Gerrard and a.n. other in a marauding midfield, poulson (although I pray defour or lass) holding. Wing backs can bomb up with the 4 defensive players left. Only prob is opposition wingers who play high on the counter
Reina
Carra Skrtel Agger
Johnson Poulson Aurelio
Gerrard Jonjo
Cole
Torres
Bam
[/quote]
Jonjo? Based on what exactly?
[quote author=JimmyK link=topic=41616.msg1163146#msg1163146 date=1282851282]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163138#msg1163138 date=1282850980]
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
[/quote]
It's an issue but not a major one, as Cole could play behind. Gerrard and a.n. other in a marauding midfield, poulson (although I pray defour or lass) holding. Wing backs can bomb up with the 4 defensive players left. Only prob is opposition wingers who play high on the counter
Reina
Carra Skrtel Agger
Johnson Poulson Aurelio
Gerrard Jonjo
Cole
Torres
Bam
[/quote]
Jonjo? Based on what exactly?
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=41616.msg1163196#msg1163196 date=1282852980]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163183#msg1163183 date=1282852452]
[quote author=JimmyK link=topic=41616.msg1163146#msg1163146 date=1282851282]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163138#msg1163138 date=1282850980]
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
[/quote]
It's an issue but not a major one, as Cole could play behind. Gerrard and a.n. other in a marauding midfield, poulson (although I pray defour or lass) holding. Wing backs can bomb up with the 4 defensive players left. Only prob is opposition wingers who play high on the counter
Reina
Carra Skrtel Agger
Johnson Poulson Aurelio
Gerrard Jonjo
Cole
Torres
Bam
[/quote]
Jonjo? Based on what exactly?
[/quote]
The fact that he cant possibly be any more useless than our Brazilian Maestro ?
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163183#msg1163183 date=1282852452]
[quote author=JimmyK link=topic=41616.msg1163146#msg1163146 date=1282851282]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163138#msg1163138 date=1282850980]
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
[/quote]
It's an issue but not a major one, as Cole could play behind. Gerrard and a.n. other in a marauding midfield, poulson (although I pray defour or lass) holding. Wing backs can bomb up with the 4 defensive players left. Only prob is opposition wingers who play high on the counter
Reina
Carra Skrtel Agger
Johnson Poulson Aurelio
Gerrard Jonjo
Cole
Torres
Bam
[/quote]
Jonjo? Based on what exactly?
[/quote]
The fact that he cant possibly be any more useless than our Brazilian Maestro ?
[quote author=Niall K link=topic=41616.msg1163200#msg1163200 date=1282853344]
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=41616.msg1163196#msg1163196 date=1282852980]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163183#msg1163183 date=1282852452]
[quote author=JimmyK link=topic=41616.msg1163146#msg1163146 date=1282851282]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163138#msg1163138 date=1282850980]
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
[/quote]
It's an issue but not a major one, as Cole could play behind. Gerrard and a.n. other in a marauding midfield, poulson (although I pray defour or lass) holding. Wing backs can bomb up with the 4 defensive players left. Only prob is opposition wingers who play high on the counter
Reina
Carra Skrtel Agger
Johnson Poulson Aurelio
Gerrard Jonjo
Cole
Torres
Bam
[/quote]
Jonjo? Based on what exactly?
[/quote]
The fact that he cant possibly be any more useless than our Brazilian Maestro ?
[/quote]
in one my man
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=41616.msg1163196#msg1163196 date=1282852980]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163183#msg1163183 date=1282852452]
[quote author=JimmyK link=topic=41616.msg1163146#msg1163146 date=1282851282]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41616.msg1163138#msg1163138 date=1282850980]
Johnson would thrive in a wing back role
3-5-2
Bam
[/quote]
Aurelio would be pretty decent on the other side too..
Although we'd need a good striker for Fernando... Trouble with the BAMing..
[/quote]
It's an issue but not a major one, as Cole could play behind. Gerrard and a.n. other in a marauding midfield, poulson (although I pray defour or lass) holding. Wing backs can bomb up with the 4 defensive players left. Only prob is opposition wingers who play high on the counter
Reina
Carra Skrtel Agger
Johnson Poulson Aurelio
Gerrard Jonjo
Cole
Torres
Bam
[/quote]
Jonjo? Based on what exactly?
[/quote]
The fact that he cant possibly be any more useless than our Brazilian Maestro ?
[/quote]
in one my man
- Status