I think he also likes the sound of his own voice. Wouldnt surprise me if he insisted on doing the audiobook of Intensity himself.
I look at G+As, 30 in all comps, I would say would be brilliant.Interesting Nunez minutes do goal ratio is pretty much twice as good as anyone else at the club this season.
What would be a stellar season goal wise?
25?
I'm still unconvinced by his intelligence, link up play and composure in front of goal.
But if he improves these aspects, well, he's got all the physical attributes to score 30 goals in a season and fire us to a title challenge. He certainly has enough chances per game to do so, right now.
Funnily enough, what gave me most hope for him over the last few games wasn't his goal, but 2 moments:I think he's got more and more on the wavelength of the other players. He still has lapses and can be rash, but generally his workrate and team work defensively and offensively has got way better. His stats are brilliant, it's all a bit Andy Cole, he'll get quite a lot of chances and miss a few, but his stats will be great. Salah and Mane were guilty in the early days of missing guilt edged chances (Mane more so), it'll come, he's been great this season.
It’s not the public perception, but I’d wager he misses less chances than Haaland and converts more difficult chances too.
I kept thinking of the Torres goal lately when I looked at Nunez, funnily enough, because I definitely think he's got that in him, at the minute though he can be a bit of a kick and run merchant (that's probably doing him an injustice because he has much more to his game), which is actually a great asset to have because he can do pretty much anyone in the league one on one on the break. But he needs to not just be an option against tired legs and on the counter, he needs to keep going and gradually build up the trust to be played in the big games and not be considered a bit of a risk. I'd loathe us to feel we had to play it safe against the big sides, because he might not make the right decision.
The most unfortunate thing about Nunez is that he came in at the same time as Haaland, and the dullards basically treated them like an either/or. He was considered a failure from the off because of the magnitude of success that Haaland had. He should just be judged on his own merit.
I’m not sure I agree that Nunez was considered a failure last season due to Haaland’s success.
Nunez was judged on his own merit - he only scored 9 league goals - missed loads of chances, was offside a lot, didn’t function well upfront and managed to get himself sent off when he shouldn’t have - that’s what he was judged on.
He’s done just about everything he needed to, to show he can turn that round.
Yeh I agree with that. He was an easy target. People then were always comparing us to city. We both bought a shiny new striker and one absolutely hit the ground running and the other has taken more time. But we as Liverpool fans should have given him more time.I think opposition fans lapped it up and the comparisons from the media was non-stop from the off. Agree about what he was judged on from our point of view, but I don't think the scale of criticism would have been the same without Haaland.
Part of this was the media and fans of other clubs referring to his '£80-85m' price tag (whereas it was £60m rising to ...) vs. Haaland's €60 million (£52m / $62.6m). We all know that there were many additions to that figure and that in reality it was more like £150m but the headline figure was £52m as if all the other payables didn't exist but Nunez's were always included. Even some on here were using the upper figure !I think opposition fans lapped it up and the comparisons from the media was non-stop from the off. Agree about what he was judged on from our point of view, but I don't think the scale of criticism would have been the same without Haaland.
I think opposition fans lapped it up and the comparisons from the media was non-stop from the off. Agree about what he was judged on from our point of view, but I don't think the scale of criticism would have been the same without Haaland.
When watching the game vs Wolves, there was this moment:
Here is where I want to see Darwin take someone on with pace/trickery. Instead of shooting from 30 yards.
Yeh I agree with that. He was an easy target. People then were always comparing us to city. We both bought a shiny new striker and one absolutely hit the ground running and the other has taken more time. But we as Liverpool fans should have given him more time.
That is all true. But whether it is fair or not, the bar is always higher for us compared to City. They can spend 250 million on fullbacks and have them on the bench. I maybe wrong but not sure Grealish has delivered at a 100 million level.Part of this was the media and fans of other clubs referring to his '£80-85m' price tag (whereas it was £60m rising to ...) vs. Haaland's €60 million (£52m / $62.6m). We all know that there were many additions to that figure and that in reality it was more like £150m but the headline figure was £52m as if all the other payables didn't exist but Nunez's were always included. Even some on here were using the upper figure !
Very true, and I think this cost us in many ways (discounting the red cards). Jotta is not the type of striker who you want in a stressful situation where a lot of running is required. The question is, did Nunez have an injury ?, we now have an issue with one of our main front line men being out in Gakpo.Starting Gakpo - I've no issue with that and understand why. However bringing on Jota instead of Nunez? Maybe that cost us the match and frankly I find it mystifying because Nunez has ALL of the qualities you'd want when under the cosh (hold the ball up, faster than Jota, a better defender than Jota, far stronger than Jota and much tougher to ease off the ball).
Very true, and I think this cost us in many ways (discounting the red cards). Jotta is not the type of striker who you want in a stressful situation where a lot of running is required. The question is, did Nunez have an injury ?, we now have an issue with one of our main front line men being out in Gakpo.
I’m going to say it.
Darwin’s an impact sub - he really is a more expensive and slightly better (debatably) Lord Divock.