Liverpool vs Chelsea

[hamstrung_pigeon]

They're normally quick to point out the marks. He didn't have any, the big girl. I bet he's in the dressing room now asking someone to bite him and get a picture.

He can't fake it - they don't have someone with buck teeth and 2-foot long incisors.

 

[Modo]

No post match thread?

I was just gonna say that we probably would have won if Sturridge started. Daft having a player itching to prove himself on the bench.

 

[Rafiagra]

Souness pretty damning.

Don't blame him.

Was scandalous by Suarez.

 

[Piedro]

I had a fiver on Suarez to give away a penalty, bite someone, and score. 50000/1 KERFUCKINGCHING

 

[Hansern]

Terry 4 games for rascism and they're talking about 7 games for Suarez.
Laughable.

Tbh, and not with red tinted glasses. Ivanovic doesnt have any marks on his arm. Does his teeth connect with the arm?

 

[juniormember]

You do realise Ajax sold him to us because he did exactly the same thing in Holland and received a massive ban, hes already had one 9 game ban here, Id be amazed if the next one isnt longer. He just doesnt learn its like he has a pathological need to be the villain. Its not worth the hassle of having one of the best players in the world sitting in the stand cos hes banned for 10 games a season

All the faith and support shown to him by this club and its fans and he goes and does that, how low would he have to sink before some people would accept that he is dragging the club through the mud

That's just stupid. Having 'one of the best players in the world', your words, minus 10 games a season is well worth it. We're a top 8 side right now, not top 3. We're lucky to have the crazy fucker.

 

[6TimesaRed]

Viloent conduct 3 games probably.... I saw that Ivanovic made sure to complain to the ref....

Was he brandished a yellow for that? surely be would of been sent off..

 

[gkmacca]

Seriously, they've shown it very slowly now and there's not a mark. It's a STUPID gesture but to bite and not leave a mark - even on a first date you'd expect some reddening!

 

[hamstrung_pigeon]

Ref did not see it.. So no ban.. But then the FA change the rules to suit them

I thought vinny Jones was your ultimate twat in football, but my god Suarez makes him look like an Angel sometimes..

No - ref doesn't see it = retrospective action is possible.
Ref sees it and regardless what he decides = no retrospective action can be taken.

Suarez doesn't even come close to Jones really. Suarez is all rash, stupid and has anger management issues on the pitch, but Jones is really all about beating people up. Michael Brown is all about emulating Jones, with a much more punchable face.

 

[LeTallecWiz]

Ref did not see it.. So no ban.. But then the FA change the rules to suit them

I thought vinny Jones was your ultimate twat in football, but my god Suarez makes him look like an Angel sometimes..

But he's our nutter

 

[iseered]

"He doesn't have marks"... Jesus fucking Christ. There is no defending that, please don't even try.

 

[juniormember]

Ref did not see it.. So no ban.. But then the FA change the rules to suit them

I thought vinny Jones was your ultimate twat in football, but my god Suarez makes him look like an Angel sometimes..

Eh? The fact the ref didn't see it equals a ban. That's an official rule.

 

[LeTallecWiz]

"He doesn't have marks"... Jesus fucking Christ. There is no defending that, please don't even try.

Conur.