• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Liverpool to double money with new £15M-a-year shirt sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35629.msg938343#msg938343 date=1252020493]
[quote author=doctor_mac link=topic=35629.msg938292#msg938292 date=1252012681]
To pay off a debt we incurred so we could have the privilege of being owned by them!

I fucking hate them. We really, really fucked up with this guys so badly.
[/quote]

In thier defense, everyone else who wanted to take over had planned exactly the same thing.
[/quote]

True, but everyone else may have begun (or perhaps nearly completed) the task of building a stadium, perhaps avoided having public rows between themselves and the manager etc. If an initial debt looked like putting us in the financial league as Utd (as everyone promised) then it would not be so galling. These guys, whilst they have certainly not been helped by the financial crisis, have told lies from day 1. I find it hard to imagine worse contenders for dragging the club through shite than this pair of clampets.
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35629.msg938343#msg938343 date=1252020493]
[quote author=doctor_mac link=topic=35629.msg938292#msg938292 date=1252012681]
To pay off a debt we incurred so we could have the privilege of being owned by them!

I fucking hate them. We really, really fucked up with this guys so badly.
[/quote]

In thier defense, everyone else who wanted to take over had planned exactly the same thing.
[/quote]
Are you sure, did DIC want to do the same thing?
I know there were rumours they wanted sell the club in 7 yrs but did want to cripple the club with debt because they don't have a billion between them?
 
How would everyone feel if we won the premier league?

It would obviously be in part due to the signings made under the two Americans? Would it alter anyone's opinions?
 
It's complex situation, HC, because the way in which those players were bought is, right now, damaging our club - which is at direct odds with 'the only thing that matters in football is trophies'.

I reckon if we won it this year all the credit would Rafa Benitez for winning it 'without being backed', with many ignoring the money he pissed away last summer.
 
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=35629.msg938713#msg938713 date=1252071765]
It's complex situation, HC, because the way in which those players were bought is, right now, damaging our club - which is at direct odds with 'the only thing that matters in football is trophies'.

I reckon if we won it this year all the credit would Rafa Benitez for winning it 'without being backed', with many ignoring the money he pissed away last summer.
[/quote]

Yeah but how many teams have bought as many £10M + players as we have since the Americans arrived, less than 5 probably.

I think Rafa's idea of being backed are unattainable at every club bar 2 in the world and even then, I'm not sure he'd get 'his' targets.

The stadium situation is obviously a disgrace in the transfer market, have they not backed him fairly well, regardless of the source of the money - people rather we didn't have Torres and Mascherano et al and still had Moores I take it?
 
[quote author=Fabio Alrighty-o link=topic=35629.msg938153#msg938153 date=1251994169]
[quote author=Hansern link=topic=35629.msg938152#msg938152 date=1251994102]
Appols if this has already been posted, but I didn't see it anywhere;

Liverpool are enjoying success in their new shirt sponsorship talks.

The Daily Mail says Liverpool have two financial institutions - favourites Standard Chartered Bank and Prudential - competing for their shirt sponsorship contract and prepared to pay upwards of £15m-a-year, almost double the current agreement with Carlsberg.

In contrast, Tottenham are struggling to find a new sponsor prepared to increase their annual £8.5m received from Mansion.

[/quote]

They are some fucking gay sponsors right there
[/quote]

Ha ha ha ha ha !
 
[quote author=rubans link=topic=35629.msg938685#msg938685 date=1252067183]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35629.msg938343#msg938343 date=1252020493]
[quote author=doctor_mac link=topic=35629.msg938292#msg938292 date=1252012681]
To pay off a debt we incurred so we could have the privilege of being owned by them!

I fucking hate them. We really, really fucked up with this guys so badly.
[/quote]

In thier defense, everyone else who wanted to take over had planned exactly the same thing.
[/quote]
Are you sure, did DIC want to do the same thing?
I know there were rumours they wanted sell the club in 7 yrs but did want to cripple the club with debt because they don't have a billion between them?
[/quote]
Yup, DIC are in exactly the same business that the Yanks are. Leveraged buyouts.

Even Share Liverpool want to saddle the club with debt.
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35629.msg938975#msg938975 date=1252147086]
[quote author=rubans link=topic=35629.msg938685#msg938685 date=1252067183]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35629.msg938343#msg938343 date=1252020493]
[quote author=doctor_mac link=topic=35629.msg938292#msg938292 date=1252012681]
To pay off a debt we incurred so we could have the privilege of being owned by them!

I fucking hate them. We really, really fucked up with this guys so badly.
[/quote]

In thier defense, everyone else who wanted to take over had planned exactly the same thing.
[/quote]
Are you sure, did DIC want to do the same thing?
I know there were rumours they wanted sell the club in 7 yrs but did want to cripple the club with debt because they don't have a billion between them?
[/quote]
Yup, DIC are in exactly the same business that the Yanks are. Leveraged buyouts.

Even Share Liverpool want to saddle the club with debt.



[/quote]

But in each case a short term debt is seen as a means to an end, with the club becoming more profitable with investment in stadium and worldwide marketing etc., and paying off the debt within a relatively short period. The fact that we will not have a stadium any time soon, and will not fulfill our financial potential means it will take much longer to service the debt, thus meaning we pay much, much more money, and are hampered financially for a more extended period.
 
Re: Liverpool to double money with new £15M-a-year shirt sponsor

[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=35629.msg938717#msg938717 date=1252072087]
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=35629.msg938713#msg938713 date=1252071765]
It's complex situation, HC, because the way in which those players were bought is, right now, damaging our club - which is at direct odds with 'the only thing that matters in football is trophies'.

I reckon if we won it this year all the credit would Rafa Benitez for winning it 'without being backed', with many ignoring the money he pissed away last summer.
[/quote]

Yeah but how many teams have bought as many £10M + players as we have since the Americans arrived, less than 5 probably.

I think Rafa's idea of being backed are unattainable at every club bar 2 in the world and even then, I'm not sure he'd get 'his' targets.

The stadium situation is obviously a disgrace in the transfer market, have they not backed him fairly well, regardless of the source of the money -  people rather we didn't have Torres and Mascherano et al and still had Moores I take it?


[/quote]

The bottom line is people would rather we had richer owners.

And Moores did back his managers admirably - let's not lose sight of that. Plus this club actually meant something to him.

I don't think Moores would have had trouble buying top quality players so long as they were the only signing that summer, but Rafa made 5 signings each year then sold 5 the next.

But as said earlier, H&G have given us a shot at the title, which many Liverpool fans simply fail to acknowledge in their assessment of the owners. 
 
The Times are reporting it's £80m over 4 years!

Get in!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/liverpool/article6831489.ece

Liverpool have secured a new shirt sponsorship deal that equals the most lucrative in football history after signing a four-year agreement with Standard Chartered, the London-based international bank, worth £80 million over four years.

With their present deal with Carlsberg due to expire in mid-2010, Liverpool’s commercial department, headed by Ian Ayre, has been looking for a money-spinning agreement in keeping with the club’s status as one of the most recognisable brands in world sport. Until July, an exclusivity accord with Carlsberg prevented them from entering into talks with any other interested parties but once that had expired, Liverpool moved swiftly to tie up a new deal.

Carlsberg has enjoyed a 17-year relationship with Liverpool, one of the longest-running associations in world sport, but was unwilling to match the £20 million a season offer made by Standard Chartered, which equals the deal struck by Manchester United with Aon Corp, the American financial giant, in June.

Liverpool have long been criticised by their supporters for punching below their weight when it comes to commercial opportunities but the sponsorship deal struck by Ayre, the commercial director, is an indication that the club are beginning to make the most of their glittering history and worldwide fan base.

Related Links
Liverpool finances in 'outstanding shape'
Benitez will not take Burnley lightly
It is too early to write us off, says Benitez
The fact that the Merseyside club have secured a sponsorship arrangement on a par with United’s is also hugely symbolic, with Liverpool having trailed some way behind their North West rivals for several years in terms of commercial enterprise. Liverpool’s deal with Carlsberg, for example, is worth just £7.2 million per annum, a figure that fell short of United’s £14 million income from AIG, the American insurance corporation.

The deal with Standard Chartered will be confirmed by Liverpool imminently, with George Gillett Jr, the club’s co-owner, having admitted during a radio interview that he expects a formal announcement to be made on Friday. “I think people will be pleased and surprised,†Gillett said. “It will be one of the great, worldwide corporations. And I think it will be a sponsor people will be pleased and surprised to be [associated with].â€

For the first time since he bought Liverpool along with Tom Hicks in February 2007, Gillett has admitted that he could be willing to sell the club “if someone gets beamed in who’s got bags of moneyâ€.

But the revelation was tempered by the American’s admission that he would “probably†be at the helm for the long term.

“The club is in outstanding shape,†Gillett said. “Economically, it’s never been stronger. We just paid down our debt very substantially. We have less debt per dollar than any club in the league.â€

Liverpool, meanwhile, have sealed a £250,000 deal with Southend United for the transfer of Michael Ngoo, a 16-year-old centre forward who was also being watched by Manchester United. Ngoo, who is 6ft 4in and has been likened in style to Peter Crouch, impressed during a recent trial with United but Liverpool have beaten their North West rivals to his signature after meeting Southend’s asking price.

In a departure from the recent furore surrounding the transfers of a number of teenagers, the deal for Ngoo has not resulted in acrimony between Liverpool and Southend, with the Coca-Cola League One club praising their Barclays Premier League counterparts for the way negotiations were conducted
 
Shit, didn't read all the article properly and just noiced the bit aout ngoo, is the to keep ngog happy or amoo?
 
so if these cunts allegedly took the alonso money etc where do you think this 80 million is going to?
 
[quote author=rage link=topic=35629.msg942028#msg942028 date=1252706263]
so if these cunts allegedly took the alonso money etc where do you think this 80 million is going to?
[/quote]


'took' the alonso money? what does that mean? it's their money, they don't have to take it.

and the size of this deal is great news for the club, however you want to twist it.
 
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=35629.msg942039#msg942039 date=1252707918]
Apparently it was really the last thing Parry arranged before he went

regards
[/quote]

I thought that we'd all agreed that signing Keane was his last act?
 
standard-chartered-miw-01.png
 
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=35629.msg942037#msg942037 date=1252707626]
[quote author=rage link=topic=35629.msg942028#msg942028 date=1252706263]
so if these cunts allegedly took the alonso money etc where do you think this 80 million is going to?
[/quote]


'took' the alonso money? what does that mean? it's their money, they don't have to take it.

and the size of this deal is great news for the club, however you want to twist it.
[/quote]

how am i twisting it. just go look at previous threads where the consensus was that if we sold players the yanks would take the money to pay off their debts. why would it be different now?
 
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=35629.msg942045#msg942045 date=1252709205]
standard-chartered-miw-01.png


[/quote]

That's a shit logo, almost as bad as if it was written in comic sans.
 
who cares what the logo looks like. £20m a season is an awesome amount to be receiving considering the current climate.
 
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=35629.msg942039#msg942039 date=1252707918]
Apparently it was really the last thing Parry arranged before he went

regards
[/quote]

Bring him back!!!!
 
[quote author=Bristow link=topic=35629.msg942057#msg942057 date=1252714473]
who cares what the logo looks like. £20m a season is an awesome amount to be receiving considering the current climate.
[/quote]

Is the right answer.
 
I like Std Chartered! Get in.

And jersey sale will double now that Muslims can buy and wear it.
 
[quote author=Y1 link=topic=35629.msg942068#msg942068 date=1252716986]
I like Std Chartered! Get in.

And jersey sale will double now that Muslims can buy and wear it.
[/quote]

[insert (deserved) dig at online store here]
 
The logo will be in white anyway surely.

Credit to the owners and the commercial directer for sorting out a very decent deal.
 
[quote author=rage link=topic=35629.msg942028#msg942028 date=1252706263]
so if these cunts allegedly took the alonso money etc where do you think this 80 million is going to?
[/quote]

It means that they need less money from the transfer in/out kitty to pay off debts. Surely you can work that out?
 
[quote author=Y1 link=topic=35629.msg942068#msg942068 date=1252716986]
I like Std Chartered! Get in.

And jersey sale will double now that Muslims can buy and wear it.
[/quote]

why can muslims now buy and wear it?

standard charter make money through charging their customers interest, surely this is as 'haram' as making money off selling alcohol.

i'd be extremely surprised if this deal means we see more transfer money BUT i agree its far far better and more of an accurate value of our global brand value than ever before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom