Unconvincing wins are great when they are surrounded by convincing wins.
They're not so good when surrounded by unconvincing losses...
Oh yes, the end of the run has been terrible ... no complaints there.
Unconvincing wins are great when they are surrounded by convincing wins.
They're not so good when surrounded by unconvincing losses...
There's a difference between unconvincing and poor performances
We won with poor performances. Chelsea still look assured, just very unconvincing
A rare performance where they looked shite and still came away with the pointsManure I get, but "assured" against QPR?
A rare performance where they looked shite and still came away with the points
They never look good, it's why I said "assured". They know how to win. They do just enough to get a result. They rarely get out of 2nd gear because they don't have to.I'm not sure if you've watched them much over the last few months - but they've rarely looked 'good' ... Fabregas has been shite, Costa has barely scored the 2nd half and bar Hazard, they little creative outlet (Oscar can't even last 60 minutes now as Jose 'closes' games after 60 minutes).
Let's not go overboard here.
... I feel so bad for those Chelsea fans ... two straight games winning 1-0 on only one shot ... Must be so tough to scrape through wins.
There's a hell of a difference between a talented team winning without breaking a sweat, and a mess of a team straining to win and only just managing it.
I wasn't stressing that - I was stressing a poster complaining about winning ugly.
I get it though ... Have a good day all.
Yep.. They have a defence of steel and set up not to lose as well as a will to win.Are you mental?
You bemoan the unbeaten run between Jan and March because we scraped through games but when Chelsea fumble to wins it's all down to 'mentality'?!
Oh okay mate.
Nobody wins titles with 3 at the back..
Bayern Munich are 12 points clear at the top of the Bundesliga.
I reckon they will win it.
If you have the players in your armourey I guess it can work..
We haven't.. it worked for a while but it never really was a long term option.. It always felt like a temporary solution..
I highly doubt we will be playing it next season...
Why did it work for a while, and not in the long term?
Because we don't have the players, one injury to key a player and the system was doomed.. the players look like they have stopped playing for the Manager..
When you become reliant on Lucas.. a player that was previously surplus to requirements.. to shore things up.. It can only be a step backwards in the long term..
Why did it work for a period at all?
We don't have the players to win the league, regardless of the formation.
Limping through a competition isn't so unusual for us, but we usually pick it up at this stage. And we had a side packed with internationals, many of whom have played at Wembley and other big stadia in big games, so Rodgers can't just say the players looked overwhelmed by the occasion - why the hell were they?
That I do not know.. when all players fit it worked to a degree..
But some of the players he signed struggled to adapt
Rodgers became set on the 3-4-3 formation rather than changing a formation when injury struck to suit the players..
Probably because a realisation sunk in.. that the players we signed where indeed... not all that great... 3 4 3 was designed to get the best out of what he had..
The whole system papers over what was a terrible transfer windows for us.. Rodger Ego is part of the problem
Bayern Munich are 12 points clear at the top of the Bundesliga.
I reckon they will win it.
The other issue this year is the lack of goals. We signed Balotelli, Lambert and recalled Borini. So we go three strikers in, and got as many goals and assists from them as we did from Sturridge who was injured for most of it, and has looked poor when he's played. That's a seriously bad poor return. I'd prefer if we had better players thatn those three, but there's enough talent between them to at least have 20 goals in total, no matter what formation we play. They either weren't been played right, they weren't motivated well enough, or something else is wrong. Worse players have scored a lot more than all of them.
Yep.. They have a defence of steel and set up not to lose as well as a will to win.
Our unbeaten run papered over the cracks.. Once the formation was found out.. We have no answer..
Nobody wins titles with 3 at the back..
At the moment Chelsea are going through a tricky spell without their 1st choice strikers.. But still grinding out results..
But apart from Juve, Bayern Munich and of course Barcelona has anybody ever had any success with 3 at the back?And Juve play with 3 at the back a lot of the time.
But apart from Juve, Bayern Munich and of course Barcelona has anybody ever had any success with 3 at the back?
But apart from Juve, Bayern Munich and of course Barcelona has anybody ever had any success with 3 at the back?
We just need players of the same elk as Barcelona then.Huge differance with those teams compard to ours.. If you have the attack and armourey, your best form of defense is attack...
Barcelona have always looked vulnerable at the back.. but there firepower puts any vulnerabilities at the back to bed..
That being said.. nobody has won anything in this league with 3 at the back as there tried and trusted formation... I don't think they ever will..
We just need players of the same elk as Barcelona then.
Only if Frank deer Boer is manager.We could start with Marc-Andre Ter Stagan.