Neither demands any respect.
Who's respecting it ?
Neither demands any respect.
I think he'll leave now. Although he's brought a lot of it on himself, it's clear that the FA have it in for him and he's not judged on a level playing field. The hypocritical moral high grounders will have their day of celebration and we'll be a worse team for it. I'm looking forward to 10th place already next season. But, hey, at least we'll have our values.
And there you have what people are complaining about here. I think Suarez deserved a ban, perhaps 6 games for this. He acted like a complete twat but this 10 games is OTT.
All those other incidents are real and ended in lesser bans:
Viera spitting at Ruddock - 6 games - including the three for the red card prior to the incident
Diouf spitting at a fan - 2 game ban from UEFA
Keane on Haaland - 3 game ban from the red card (he admitted he meant to injure Haaland - albeit later)
Thatcher on Mendes - 8 game ban - plus he had form for doing this weeks prior to this
Chris Morgan on Hume - (which resulted in Hume having his skull operated on ) - 0 game !!!
The problem is there is no correlation between punishment and harm - real or potential. I'd say it was random but the minute it was Luis Suarez we all guessed it was going to be heavy - and that smacks of a lack of impartiality in the 'system'
That is true.
Suarez will come back looking clinical as fuck, as he always does when rested properly.
Oh. I can't remember doing it. I'll sort it later though!
Harm can't be the determining factor, it would lead to crazy results.
I
After 44 pages, I still haven't read a good reason to sell him. He's one of our top players and with him will guarantee more wins than not.
Can the "sellers" please provide a good reason for LFC to not keep him? Thanks
That's a different question. Keep to the thread title otherwise Ros might get upperity! 😉Oh I wouldn't sell him but I think he'll leave
Oh I wouldn't sell him but I think he'll leave
I did say potential for harm as well. I'm not saying it should be measured on the degree of harm inflicted. What should be the determining factor then ? Whether your name is Suarez and you wear a Liverpool shirt ?
Forced to leave more like.. Liverpool have had their arm forced.. they will Sell.. 10 games ban for a team that is built around Suarez is far too much..
At the most it will be 5 games in the league, the other in the Carling Cup..
We need to hit the ground running, if we get a tough start to the campaign.. he will be gone..
Rosco talks like he's the FA's lawyer.
I wish he'd attempt to talk like Liverpool's lawyer every once in a while.
Rosco talks like he's the FA's lawyer.
I wish he'd attempt to talk like Liverpool's lawyer every once in a while. You know, considering he supports the club and all.
Surely we're fascinated by it *because* we're disgusted by it?
No, we're fascinated by it, then those in bad faith condemn it while replaying it so as to excuse themselves. If there's anything I've learned from this it's that England loves a good bite.
Forced to sell? Behave.Forced to leave more like.. Liverpool have had their arm forced.. they will Sell.. 10 games ban for a team that is built around Suarez is far too much..
At the most it will be 5 games in the league, the other in the Carling Cup..
We need to hit the ground running, if we get a tough start to the campaign.. he will be gone..
* For the legal eagles amongst us: what would be the basis for an appeal?
Because it makes far too much sense and the FA can't do what it wants.Are the FA saying today that the punishments refs can hand out is woefully inadequate? So if a player headbutts another player and then bites his nose off, and the ref gives him a red, they've got to stick to the 3game when they'd like to give loads more? Or if a player intentionally breaks another ones leg, it's still 3 games because 'their hands are tied'?
If their hands aren't tied, how did defoe get a no game ban for exactly the same offence.
Why don't they take the ban out of the hands of the ref? -The ref gives him a red which means he leaves the field of play, but then every single red is judged on merit and doesn't get the default 3 games. Same for yellows, if a ref gives a yellow but is doing drugs that day, they can still throw the book at people.