• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Just Shut the F**K up already...

Status
Not open for further replies.

6TimesaRed

Not a Bot....
Administrator
TOM HICKS has denied promising previous Liverpool owner David Moores that he wouldn’t plunge the club into debt.

The extensive borrowing of Hicks and co-owner George Gillett have sent Liverpool £351million into the red and burdened them with crippling annual interest payments.

Moores says that went against what was agreed when he sold them the club in 2007. The former chairman insists the terms of the deal were “unambiguous†and that investment bank Rothschild & Sons had guaranteed that the pair were “good for the moneyâ€.

However, Hicks denies that anyone was misled.

“In our agreement with the seller, no representation was made that the new ownership group would be debt-free,†Hicks said.

Hicks described Moores' criticism of their reign and his plea for them to sell up as a “weak attempt to deflect attention from the prior ownerâ€.
 
Well, Hicks has as much right to go public as Moores did, and frankly there IS an element of special pleading in Moores' letter.

Having said that, I know whom I believe on this issue and it isn't the Rhinestone Cowboy. The sly wording of Hicks' denial is interesting. Nobody's saying they thought the new group would be "debt-free". The point from which he's trying to "deflect attention" is that we were all led to believe the debt wouldn't be loaded on to the club.
 
[quote author=Foxwold link=topic=40423.msg1110032#msg1110032 date=1275126779]
They did promise the fans they wouldn't do what the Glaziers had done though.
[/quote]

Foxworld, you just confirmed it. Case closed. Hicks made public declarations to match this alleged and probably true private assurances. I'll take Moores word over the Leveraged w@nkers any day
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom