• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Glen Johnson - done deal according to papers

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=29971.msg881777#msg881777 date=1244069683]
And Ferreira's still at the club yes? How much did he cost?

And Belletti's still there isn't he?

What a fucking hovel of a club.
[/quote]

Ferreira was 13million. Belletti was free I think.

On a side note, wouldn't you think Ferreira would fuck off and start a fresh with a new club. Was he injured for all of the season too?
 
This is a huge problem in football, if rich teams will jus tbuy multiple players for the same position just to stop another team from taking them.
 
By the way, this ain't gonna happen.

They have spent nearly 30 million on 2 RB's who are still there.
Why make it 50? Silly article.
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=29971.msg881809#msg881809 date=1244071863]
they aren't going to spend £17m on someone "just to stop another team from taking them".
[/quote]

SWP - £21m
 
[quote author=Paddy link=topic=29971.msg881811#msg881811 date=1244072050]
By the way, this ain't gonna happen.

They have spent nearly 30 million on 2 RB's who are still there.
Why make it 50? Silly article.
[/quote]I agree. Bosingwa had a brilliant season, why would they replace him. And even more laughable is the suggestion that the England manager would tout a clubs players behind their backs to an old pal. Could you imagine?
 
[quote author=Paddy link=topic=29971.msg881787#msg881787 date=1244070781]
Fuck that. Get Srna.
[/quote]

I read a headline that that mentioned Corluka stating Spurs are interested. I'm guessing it was just him trying to get his name mentioned though.

I can't see Chelsea signing Johnson - Boswinga has been good enough.
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=29971.msg881866#msg881866 date=1244097280]
johnson will remember his chelsea nightmare and join us.
[/quote]

The press look deadset on making us look like chumps and pricing us out of moves. It's giving off an impression to players and clubs that we're not willing to spend big, while Chelsea and City are seemingly ready to pay ANYTHING to sign player...

Not good >🙁
 
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=29971.msg881873#msg881873 date=1244098705]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=29971.msg881866#msg881866 date=1244097280]
johnson will remember his chelsea nightmare and join us.
[/quote]

The press look deadset on making us look like chumps and pricing us out of moves. It's giving off an impression to players and clubs that we're not willing to spend big, while Chelsea and City are seemingly ready to pay ANYTHING to sign player...

Not good >🙁
[/quote]

the flip side is the players who DO join will be motivated by more than just money. look at barry, bazza you're full of shit, 'CL football' indeed :🙂
 
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=29971.msg881873#msg881873 date=1244098705]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=29971.msg881866#msg881866 date=1244097280]
johnson will remember his chelsea nightmare and join us.
[/quote]

The press look deadset on making us look like chumps and pricing us out of moves. It's giving off an impression to players and clubs that we're not willing to spend big, while Chelsea and City are seemingly ready to pay ANYTHING to sign player...

Not good >🙁
[/quote]Who cares mate. Let them talk. We will sign our targets regardless.
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=29971.msg881875#msg881875 date=1244098809]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=29971.msg881873#msg881873 date=1244098705]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=29971.msg881866#msg881866 date=1244097280]
johnson will remember his chelsea nightmare and join us.
[/quote]

The press look deadset on making us look like chumps and pricing us out of moves. It's giving off an impression to players and clubs that we're not willing to spend big, while Chelsea and City are seemingly ready to pay ANYTHING to sign player...

Not good >🙁
[/quote]

the flip side is the players who DO join will be motivated by more than just money.
[/quote]

Yeah true mate..
 
[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=29971.msg881876#msg881876 date=1244098830]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=29971.msg881873#msg881873 date=1244098705]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=29971.msg881866#msg881866 date=1244097280]
johnson will remember his chelsea nightmare and join us.
[/quote]

The press look deadset on making us look like chumps and pricing us out of moves. It's giving off an impression to players and clubs that we're not willing to spend big, while Chelsea and City are seemingly ready to pay ANYTHING to sign player...

Not good >🙁
[/quote]Who cares mate. Let them talk. We will sign our targets regardless.
[/quote]

what, like barry?
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=29971.msg881879#msg881879 date=1244098881]
So you don't think Barry and Johnson were targets?

Ahahahaha
[/quote]Who me? Well theres unsubstantiated unconfirmed reports that we came in with a late offer for Barry but told him A)he wouldnt play every game B)he would be a left back. These reports suggested we matched the bid and he wanted first team assurances so thats irrelevant.
And i dont think for one second Chelsea want Johnson, and IF he is a target i believe we will sign him.
 
[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=29971.msg881883#msg881883 date=1244099202]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=29971.msg881879#msg881879 date=1244098881]
So you don't think Barry and Johnson were targets?

Ahahahaha
[/quote]Who me? Well theres unsubstantiated unconfirmed reports that we came in with a late offer for Barry but told him A)he wouldnt play every game B)he would be a left back. These reports suggested we matched the bid and he wanted first team assurances so thats irrelevant.
And i dont think for one second Chelsea want Johnson, and IF he is a target i believe we will sign him.
[/quote]

Just as a side note in all of this, does anyone really think we said we wouldn't give him first team football?

I reckon it probably went along these lines:

BARRY: I want assurances I'll play every week.

RAFA: I don't do that for noone, I like pothibilities, and you have to show you're good enough to be in there everyweek.
 
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=29971.msg881885#msg881885 date=1244099605]
[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=29971.msg881883#msg881883 date=1244099202]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=29971.msg881879#msg881879 date=1244098881]
So you don't think Barry and Johnson were targets?

Ahahahaha
[/quote]Who me? Well theres unsubstantiated unconfirmed reports that we came in with a late offer for Barry but told him A)he wouldnt play every game B)he would be a left back. These reports suggested we matched the bid and he wanted first team assurances so thats irrelevant.
And i dont think for one second Chelsea want Johnson, and IF he is a target i believe we will sign him.
[/quote]

Just as a side note in all of this, does anyone really think we said we wouldn't give him first team football?

I reckon it probably went along these lines:

BARRY: I want assurances I'll play every week.

RAFA: I don't do that for noone, I like pothibilities, and you have to show you're good enough to be in there everyweek.
[/quote]Yup.
 
Fucking hell - rebel was right. City, Real and a wallet-loosened Abramovich have made the market go crazy. What happened to the global recession?
 
We just can't stop talking about Barry can we.

Given that City wanted him, we were never going to get him unless he liked making half as much money for the remainder of his career.
 
All this talk about Chelsea trumping us for Johnson with a higher offer seems to ignore the reported release clause put in his contract at his insistence last summer. Wasn't it about 11/12m? If so, that'd be all we have to offer to talk to the lad - and if he's any sense he'd choose Anfield.
 
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=29971.msg881944#msg881944 date=1244105508]
All this talk about Chelsea trumping us for Johnson with a higher offer seems to ignore the reported release clause put in his contract at his insistence last summer. Wasn't it about 11/12m? If so, that'd be all we have to offer to talk to the lad - and if he's any sense he'd choose Anfield.
[/quote]

Life doesn`t work like that, though. Chelsea have as good title credentials as we and are far more likely to offer him a higher wage package. If you think it's the obviously "sensible" decision to choose us, you're delusional.

I rate Johnson highly and would love to see him sign for us (even though I like Arbeloa and think a lot of the recent criticism of his is OTT) but if Chelsea are willing to pay big for him, he will return there.
 
[quote author=darkstarexodus link=topic=29971.msg881962#msg881962 date=1244106329]
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=29971.msg881944#msg881944 date=1244105508]
All this talk about Chelsea trumping us for Johnson with a higher offer seems to ignore the reported release clause put in his contract at his insistence last summer. Wasn't it about 11/12m? If so, that'd be all we have to offer to talk to the lad - and if he's any sense he'd choose Anfield.
[/quote]

Life doesn`t work like that, though. Chelsea have as good title credentials as we and are far more likely to offer him a higher wage package. If you think it's the obviously "sensible" decision to choose us, you're delusional.

I rate Johnson highly and would love to see him sign for us (even though I like Arbeloa and think a lot of the recent criticism of his is OTT) but if Chelsea are willing to pay big for him, he will return there.
[/quote]

The "sensible" decision in your eyes is to return to the club which previously couldn't find a place for you, who
since then have spent £16M on Bosingwa, a player who has had a strong debut season?

Chelsea will prove tempting to him providing they come in with mega-wages, granted, but to suggest they'd be way out in front of us is nonsense. He's just broke into the England team and with Capello declaring Johnson as Englands number 1 right-back yesterday, he's going to be look to be playing as much football as possible, and, as it stands, we can offer him far greater assurances.
 
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=29971.msg881972#msg881972 date=1244106754]
[quote author=darkstarexodus link=topic=29971.msg881962#msg881962 date=1244106329]
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=29971.msg881944#msg881944 date=1244105508]
All this talk about Chelsea trumping us for Johnson with a higher offer seems to ignore the reported release clause put in his contract at his insistence last summer. Wasn't it about 11/12m? If so, that'd be all we have to offer to talk to the lad - and if he's any sense he'd choose Anfield.
[/quote]

Life doesn`t work like that, though. Chelsea have as good title credentials as we and are far more likely to offer him a higher wage package. If you think it's the obviously "sensible" decision to choose us, you're delusional.

I rate Johnson highly and would love to see him sign for us (even though I like Arbeloa and think a lot of the recent criticism of his is OTT) but if Chelsea are willing to pay big for him, he will return there.
[/quote]

The "sensible" decision in your eyes is to return to the club which previously couldn't find a place for you, who
since then have spent £16M on Bosingwa, a player who has had a strong debut season?

Chelsea will prove tempting to him providing they come in with mega-wages, granted, but to suggest they'd be way out in front of us is nonsense. He's just broke into the England team and with Capello declaring Johnson as Englands number 1 right-back yesterday, he's going to be look to be playing as much football as possible, and, as it stands, we can offer him far greater assurances.

[/quote]

Choosing City over us wasn't the most "sensible" decision for Barry to make either, given his stated desire to play in the Champions League, was it?

If all things were equal in terms of transfer fee, wages, etc., certainly I think Johnson would likely come here. However, given that this is not likely to be the case, he may very well go back to Chelsea. He has improved his play quite a bit since Chelsea sold him and, while Boswinga is a very good fullback, if Johnson has confidence in his own ability he may well feel he can earn the spot.

I don't mean to suggest Chelsea are "way out in front" but I don't think coming to us is an obvious choice either. We need to compete with our rivals in terms of wages and fees in addition to providing the right environment and playing opportunities.
 
I think he's a good buy. We desperately need a top class left mid and some back up for Nando and maybe centre back, but we I do think we need a really top drawer right back. He'd overlap kuyt very nicely and give us more balance than arbeloa has this season. However, if buying johnson results In us buying a slightly cheaper left mid player, I'll be livid.
 
Has there been any indication other than tabloid filler that he's ever been a major target?

I always felt the speculation in January was about him getting a new contract at Pompey, which he did.
 
[quote author=darkstarexodus link=topic=29971.msg881978#msg881978 date=1244107069]
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=29971.msg881972#msg881972 date=1244106754]
[quote author=darkstarexodus link=topic=29971.msg881962#msg881962 date=1244106329]
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=29971.msg881944#msg881944 date=1244105508]
All this talk about Chelsea trumping us for Johnson with a higher offer seems to ignore the reported release clause put in his contract at his insistence last summer.  Wasn't it about 11/12m?  If so, that'd be all we have to offer to talk to the lad - and if he's any sense he'd choose Anfield.
[/quote]

Life doesn`t work like that, though. Chelsea have as good title credentials as we and are far more likely to offer him a higher wage package. If you think it's the obviously "sensible" decision to choose us, you're delusional.

I rate Johnson highly and would love to see him sign for us (even though I like Arbeloa and think a lot of the recent criticism of his is OTT) but if Chelsea are willing to pay big for him, he will return there.
[/quote]

The "sensible" decision in your eyes is to return to the club which previously couldn't find a place for you, who
since then have spent £16M on Bosingwa, a player who has had a strong debut season?

Chelsea will prove tempting to him providing they come in with mega-wages, granted, but to suggest they'd be way out in front of us is nonsense. He's just broke into the England team and with Capello declaring Johnson as Englands number 1 right-back yesterday, he's going to be look to be playing as much football as possible, and, as it stands, we can offer him far greater assurances.

[/quote]

Choosing City over us wasn't the most "sensible" decision for Barry to make either, given his stated desire to play in the Champions League, was it?

If all things were equal in terms of transfer fee, wages, etc., certainly I think Johnson would likely come here. However, given that this is not likely to be the case, he may very well go back to Chelsea. He has improved his play quite a bit since Chelsea sold him and, while Boswinga is a very good fullback, if Johnson has confidence in his own ability he may well feel he can earn the spot.

I don't mean to suggest Chelsea are "way out in front" but I don't think coming to us is an obvious choice either. We need to compete with our rivals in terms of wages and fees in addition to providing the right environment and playing opportunities.
[/quote]

Barry's a fair comparison to a point because he definitely chased the wage over holding out for guaranteed CL football, but there are several key differences; firstly he's going to stroll into that City side and keep his England spot. Secondly Barry will find himself surrounded by very good players before the end of his career and probably will play in the CL whilst wearing that light blue shirt.

As for 'having confidence in his own ability' well that's a given for any player moving into the top four. It doesn't change the fact that you'll look at your direct competition and think about you chances of getting in. Managers like to rely upon a settled back-line and once you've been 'judged' it can take a lot of good performances and hard work to become a regular again (athough conversely Johnson can looking to an attacking player, SWP, to see how harmful moving to Chelsea can be, as well as relying on his own experience)

I think we're in agreement that it would be a close decision, but from a footballing perspective we're the greater proposition and it's certainly not "delusional" to suggest so.
 
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=29971.msg881889#msg881889 date=1244100534]
Fucking hell - rebel was right. City, Real and a wallet-loosened Abramovich have made the market go crazy. What happened to the global recession?

[/quote]

Its a tough one in so much as rafa has said publicly that he likes to get his transfers tied up quickly as possible, but with the likes of real, Chelsea and citeh being linked with and possibly bidding for many top targets at the moment, its bound to push up transfer fees right now, but if rafa were to wait, maybe that would ease. Once the three mega rich clubs have done their buying, we could pick up remaining transfer targets for probably a lot less. But then we risk missing out on potential top targets. I would like to think the lure of playing for a team and club like ours is enough to sway players towards signing for us, but with such mega rich rival bidders it could cost us a fortune.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom