Signing Ings is a potentially very good deal. Firstly he'll give us more than Balotelli, Borini and Lambert.
He scored 11 goals for a team that got relegated in his first season in the PL.
Those of us who watched his game at Old Trafford could see in his performance a lot of the elements that have been missing for us this season.
I make that about 12 goals allowing for the Halmeister pessimism factor. 😉 For the no.3 striker I hope he'd be signed to be, that's not bad. It does underline the need to sign another top rank front player as well though.
The trouble with that is that it would leave us with the likes of Borini as stand-in.
This to me is the biggest problem with our scouting in general. Is that performance a reflection of his actual ability or an outlier on a good day where he performed two three levels above his natural ability. Not a criticism at you mate but in general our scouts do not seem to have the ability to gauge whether a players performance in a season is his peak or he actually has more latent talent and will improve further when he moves to Liverpool.
Thats a good point mate. Think I've read we've scouted him for a few years, so hopefully we've done our homework.
We've scouted quite a few for years only for them to start very badly, like Markovic. We do our homework okay. We just don't get good marks for it.
Danny Ings is fine in isolation, but if its Ings and Benteke it becomes a problem. We need a world class striker, and we have the money for it, the problem is we are going to waste that money on Benteke.
The problem is that Wold Class strikers don't / won't come to LFC anymore.
If it's first team football he's after I can't see him getting that guaranteed at Arsenal.I think the big reason we might get Milner is because he wants to stay up North. I wouldn't be surprised if Arsenal sway him though. Even if Rodgers is staying, any assurances we give him about playing must surely be seen as balancing on a knife edge, dependent on if we change manager.
If it's first team football he's after I can't see him getting that guaranteed at Arsenal.
Both represent a smart value for money signings that will help the club push on. I just hope the money saved on these two signings is put towards some genuine quality up front and not spread thinly across multiple positions.
I think the big reason we might get Milner is because he wants to stay up North. I wouldn't be surprised if Arsenal sway him though. Even if Rodgers is staying, any assurances we give him about playing must surely be seen as balancing on a knife edge, dependent on if we change manager.
Bascombe has gone as far as said there is a verbal agreement with Milner.
If we get Clyne aswell for 15 mill, then thats 2 very good signings that improve the first team and one promising for roughly 20 mill. Great start to the transfer window imho. If it happens..
I don't see it. These players remind me of Downing, Carroll, and Cole. Yes they are much cheaper, but ability wise it's pretty fucking far from very good.
Yep, great start, and covers all the positions we badly need, besides from the top top striker, hopefully we'd spend the rest of the window getting that one sorted.Clyne is one of the best right backs in England and could be our first team right back for 8-9 years.
Milner is extremely far from being close to Downing, Cole or Carroll.
Ings is a gamble, but a promising one.
The good thing is all three have a genuine competitive spirit, so that would be a boost if they all come. At least we'll have three players, along with Hendo and Skittles, with a bit of tenacity and fight. We need top quality on top of that now.
But there's a huge risk there that you sacrifice quality and technique for good old British fighting spirit.
The trouble with that is that it would leave us with the likes of Borini as stand-in.