• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?

Do any of these worldometer sites show a break down of deaths based upon whether they're a) elderly or b) already have an underlying condition? I'd be interested to see, say for example in the UK how many of the 44k that have died, how many were already ill, or elderly. I'm sure I saw figures a couple of months back, that the percentage of people getting seriously ill, or dying was pretty slim if the person wasn't in one of those 2 brackets?
 
Do any of these worldometer sites show a break down of deaths based upon whether they're a) elderly or b) already have an underlying condition? I'd be interested to see, say for example in the UK how many of the 44k that have died, how many were already ill, or elderly. I'm sure I saw figures a couple of months back, that the percentage of people getting seriously ill, or dying was pretty slim if the person wasn't in one of those 2 brackets?

I'm afraid the data collector is likely to be an utter moron. Of course, they send an invoice to the government, the government will then send a cheque to pay for services rendered. The accounting data for that will be accurate to the last penny, be in no doubt of that. But at no point in this chain of important work does the veracity and accuracy of the data matter to anybody. Who gives a shit as long as the cheques keep coming? Indeed, if you know the government need to tell the media they've increased the number of tests being done, then it's in your financial interests to count repeat tests on the same person twice, keep the government happy you know, and count the swab in the cheek as one test, then shove it up their nose and what do we have here, yes it's a second test, good times baby, break out the red panties! I hope that clears up the nature and purpose of the data for you.
 
I think it's the whole tiny droplets hanging round in the air that the WHO don't think causes a prob is the issue here. The WHO say it's the big droplets that happen when people talk to each other and stuff. These scientists are saying you could walk into an empty pub and get it, if a dude who had been in earlier had it and the place wasn't ventilated.
 
Do any of these worldometer sites show a break down of deaths based upon whether they're a) elderly or b) already have an underlying condition? I'd be interested to see, say for example in the UK how many of the 44k that have died, how many were already ill, or elderly. I'm sure I saw figures a couple of months back, that the percentage of people getting seriously ill, or dying was pretty slim if the person wasn't in one of those 2 brackets?
Dantes is clearly talking bollocks. If you drill down into each country there are links to each source - some have multiple sources and others are Govt. websites etc.
 
Dantes is clearly talking bollocks. If you drill down into each country there are links to each source - some have multiple sources and others are Govt. websites etc.

Oh, they have links? Fuck me dead, they have links!! The people gathering the data are worthy of my respect in that case, I bow down to them.
 
Uh-oh !

Coronavirus may have lain dormant across the world and emerged when environmental conditions were right for it to thrive - rather than starting in China, an Oxford University expert believes.
Dr Tom Jefferson, senior associate tutor at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM), at Oxford, and visiting professor at Newcastle University, argues that there is growing evidence that the virus was elsewhere before it emerged in Asia.
Last week, Spanish virologists announced they had found traces of the disease in samples of waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the coronavirus disease was seen in China.
Italian scientists have also found evidence of coronavirus in sewage samples in Milan and Turin, in mid-December, many weeks before the first case was detected, while experts have found traces in Brazil in November....​
 
Oh, they have links? Fuck me dead, they have links!! The people gathering the data are worthy of my respect in that case, I bow down to them.

Well it is a novel approach, I suppose, he could do what Big D does and just make up some numbers in his head.

I mean, Big D is limited to how many numbers he can hold in is head at any one time, so it’ll be a small number.
 
Uh-oh !

Coronavirus may have lain dormant across the world and emerged when environmental conditions were right for it to thrive - rather than starting in China, an Oxford University expert believes.
Dr Tom Jefferson, senior associate tutor at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM), at Oxford, and visiting professor at Newcastle University, argues that there is growing evidence that the virus was elsewhere before it emerged in Asia.
Last week, Spanish virologists announced they had found traces of the disease in samples of waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the coronavirus disease was seen in China.
Italian scientists have also found evidence of coronavirus in sewage samples in Milan and Turin, in mid-December, many weeks before the first case was detected, while experts have found traces in Brazil in November....​

Have we traced Trump’s global movements?
 
I think it's the whole tiny droplets hanging round in the air that the WHO don't think causes a prob is the issue here. The WHO say it's the big droplets that happen when people talk to each other and stuff. These scientists are saying you could walk into an empty pub and get it, if a dude who had been in earlier had it and the place wasn't ventilated.


The evidence seems to suggest UV light kills Coronavirus. So indoors like a pub is probably the most likely place to pick it up.

Minimal risk out in the open.
 
Have we traced Trump’s global movements?
Just follow the hydroxychloroquine production line. Which it seems can cause hallucinations - thereby explaining a lot - and also heart failure, which I've got my fingers crossed for (at least up until November when he'll be gone anyway).
 
The evidence seems to suggest UV light kills Coronavirus. So indoors like a pub is probably the most likely place to pick it up.

Minimal risk out in the open.

Nightclubs should be fine then.
 
Oh, they have links? Fuck me dead, they have links!! The people gathering the data are worthy of my respect in that case, I bow down to them.
Bahaha.. says Dantes who posted the most absurd graph yet, just yesterday with the 'adjusted for available tests' bollocks.
 
Uh-oh !

Coronavirus may have lain dormant across the world and emerged when environmental conditions were right for it to thrive - rather than starting in China, an Oxford University expert believes.
Dr Tom Jefferson, senior associate tutor at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM), at Oxford, and visiting professor at Newcastle University, argues that there is growing evidence that the virus was elsewhere before it emerged in Asia.
Last week, Spanish virologists announced they had found traces of the disease in samples of waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the coronavirus disease was seen in China.
Italian scientists have also found evidence of coronavirus in sewage samples in Milan and Turin, in mid-December, many weeks before the first case was detected, while experts have found traces in Brazil in November....​

Prof. Thomas Jefferson.

Is that his real name? Without wanting to go full on Brendan.. I smell a rat.
 
I thought they had traced the viruses origins through genetic testing and now 23 and me own it's information?
 
Back
Top Bottom