Why would introducing Karius 'disrupt an already jittery defence' ? They will have worked hard together as a team in training and if the backline has more confidence in Karius than Mignolet it'll actually increase their confidence. Karius seems a far more decisive keeper, with better distribution, and since shot-stopping is neither here nor there as regards team-work those are more important traits as regards the defence as a group is concerned.
Klopp has stated Can not available
WE don't know but Klopp does. If they look good in training there is no reason not to play Karius. This 'wait until Derby' bollocks is just that, IMO. It's like not changing the brake pads on your car because they haven't let you down ...yet.Why wouldn't it? You're talking about what's gone on in training with alot of ifs and buts about them maybe trusting Karius more, and you've then gone on to say that we don't really know about him until we see him play. We know nothing about what's gone on behind the scenes or how well he's integrated into the squad (or indeed the backline)........ .
I don't think anyone thought Grujic should replace Henderson before Leicester (look at the pre-match thread) because Henderson also played well against Spurs.Before the Leicester game, people were asking why Grujic shouldn't replace Henderson, because he had struggled in two of the three games previous, then Henderson puts in a performance that looked back to his best and suddenly he's a given in the team again. Same with Sturridge. It's about timing. He'll come into the team, as will Klavan, eventually, when Klopp feels he's up to speed - at the right time. Not against a team that will be probably the most physically demanding one we've faced yet this season.
I don't think he knew Randall, Lovren, Ragnar and Moreno very well at all .. and I sincerely doubt they were well drilled ! Those were the four ahead of him. With Stewart and Grujic in midfield. Against what was an almost full strength Chelsea side. Karius with Matip / Lovren / Milner and Clyne should be even better.Yes he's played against Chelsea before, behind a well drilled defense he knew well..
Obviously Costa is back to his wild west villain worst this season, which means his best. How do we deal with him? I really hope Lucas is playing at CB, because for all he's actually OK at the position (howling errors apart), Costa would ruin him.
"Is" as in "isn't" presumably there, Doc. 😉
Yep, that's often a requirement to getting a hat trick.Studge hattrick. Minimum 2 goals for him.
It was a result of having to cut and paste that silly name and then making the font the same.
Azpazlaqueta. OK! HAPPY NOW?Am I the only one wondering which name out of Hazard and Costa the english professor had to C&P?
Azpazlaqueta. OK! HAPPY NOW?
Ah, gotcha.
That was confusing the hell outta me
For someone who has regularly been derided for being a bit brainless on the pitch, he really doesn't help himself