If we lose on Saturday after him resting everyone for it, I'm gonna sack him myself.
and how will you do that? don't tell me you're henry?
If we lose on Saturday after him resting everyone for it, I'm gonna sack him myself.
the only player I would have looked to drop/rest is enrique who badly needs a rest.
the whole premise of this thread was me asking jokingly if I we should do as I suggested or Neil.
Hence why I joked about being right, prematurely I might add.
If Carroll doesnt start on saturday I think I'll go absolutly mental.
Then I fear for your sanity............If Carroll doesnt start on saturday I think I'll go absolutly mental.
I knowI took it as a joke modo. 🙂
Did anyone see Carroll's face when he checked the notes before coming on at the weekend? He looked at the assistant and said "why?" and shook his head. Downing got hooked AGAIN for him to come on. It defies logic.
Did anyone see Carroll's face when he checked the notes before coming on at the weekend? He looked at the assistant and said "why?" and shook his head. Downing got hooked AGAIN for him to come on. It defies logic. Rafa used to do the same with Pennant and Crouch. I know Pennant was shite like, but anyway.
I know. Defies logic.
They've caused havoc as a partnership at stages this season. Goals, assists, combination play, linking as a partnership, neat interplay, opening up defenses. You name it, they haven't done it.
55M for a big bag of dick.
Of course, I could be wrong and your whole view regarding us buying a 'crosser' for a centre forward could just be stereotypical rubbish.
Which kind of puts Ryans argument to bed.
They should be playing together.
60% of our goals have been scored in the 16 matches Carroll has started...
We average 2 points a game when they play together and 1 point a game when they don't. I think I'd rather they played for a bit.
Explain to me how that wasnt the case then. And explain to me why Comolli brought up the point about Downing put in a heap of crosses as part of the rationale for buying the fucking cunt while you're at it.
I'd rather we had a manager who didn't pay 55 million pounds for the pair of tubes in the first place.
Which kind of puts Ryans argument to bed.
They should be playing together.
60% of our goals have been scored in the 16 matches Carroll has started...
Explain why they haven't played together much then? That's the point, you might argue that it's an old, unfashionable tactic, but the fact is we haven't exactly tried to bludgeon the tactic into the team, have we?
I have no idea how many times they've played together Mark, but I'm gonna gues it's about 15, maybe 20 times. I'm happy for someone to provide me the exact figure.
And in that time they haven't combined once. Not even one time. And we paid youknowhowmuch for that?
They played 11 times. Won 6 lost 2. Boss by our shitty season's standards. CL form.
I agree and I'm not going to back us spending £55m on them, it was money pissed away, but they haven't been put together that much for it to be a partnership that's been worked to death on, it hasn't.
55M was a bargain.