I think it's even better to be 1-35 than 2-34.
I wonder how great it is to be one and done.
I wonder how great it is to be one and done.
It's 2-34 so far.
The first win was shortening the cure deadline in PA for a small subset of rejected mail-in ballots from 9 days to 6 days. Those ballots weren't included in the official count anyway.
The second win was a technicality in PA where 2,349 mail-in ballots didn't have a date entered on the outer envelope, even though all were date stamped by the postal service proving they were within the date limit.
There you go again - “he fucked up the Mi”.
That’s a major fuck up when presenting an analysis of data on vote counting on Dominion machines in one state - when it’s data from votes counts in a different state and a different vote counting machine.
The data he presented also states that there were high voter turnouts based on the number of people registered to vote prior to Election Day.
This is where it’s important to get the state right - because Minnesota allows voter registration on election day, indeed had recorded voter registration on the day, has traditionally high voter turn out and some of these precincts called out by name gave voting registers if under 100 people so the % can easily skew.
So yeah - an openly pro-Trump activist signs an affidavit presenting his “thoughts” on alleged voter fraud he’s uncovered IN MICHIGAN ON DOMINION MACHINES - and it turns out that he found data that shows NO VOTER FRAUD ON NON-DOMINION MACHINES IN MINNESOTA.
If the next argument the “best lawyer in the universes can come up with” is... “well the states both start with MI” it’s no wonder that Trump is sticking with Giuliani.
Let me spell it out again for you - because you seem to be missing the point.
The only purpose the affidavit serves - because what’s in it is just nonsense - is that it allows Trump and his key people to tweet misleading information to their supporter base that they have proof of voter fraud.
Dantes. Living proof that the world’s biggest fucking retards believe that they are intelligent.
So, what's the game plan? Trump isn't going to give up that easily, is he? Were all the Spazzy Davids all submitted just to buy time so he could pack his bags and get his private jet ready to fly somewhere?
Did Avvy do that one for you?
Lol. Soliciting for donations is real though.
I told you I wasn't saying it was an "easy mistake". Not sure what to say to this.
Maybe OMG this guy is a moron? How could I have believed he wasn't. I was so dumb to vouch for his intelligence earlier. So grateful you set me straight?
Clue:
Thank you Dantes - I believe this is as close to an admission you were wrong as I’d expect to get.
Please don’t kill me and eat me.
You have 70m devoted supporters, who are now all worried about paying $20-30k more in taxes or even losing their jobs. If you ask that person to donate $50 to try to avoid that risk, it's a no-brainer. $3.5bn that works out to if my maths is correct, that'd cover about how much he has lost in net worth during his presidency and pay for the litigation the people want. Why not?
Lol. Soliciting for donations is real though.
I will never cease to be amazed at your ability to pick random numbers and pretend they have some sort of bearing on reality.
Solicitation is something Trump’s familiar with.
Ask Stormy Daniels.
What percentage of that 70m are going to pay an extra 20-30k more in taxes?You have 70m devoted supporters, who are now all worried about paying $20-30k more in taxes or even losing their jobs. If you ask that person to donate $50 to try to avoid that risk, it's a no-brainer. $3.5bn that works out to if my maths is correct, that'd cover about how much he has lost in net worth during his presidency and pay for the litigation the people want. Why not?
What percentage of that 70m are going to pay an extra 20-30k more in taxes?
It's quite simple. Apple saved four billion. The middle class are largely unchanged.
Completely ignoring that the Demos have already stated that only those earning over $100k (or something like that) will pay more tax ... thereby ruling out virtually all your 68.2% !If the tax returns are normally distributed amongst the population, and my estimate of the mean is accurate (mu = $25k), and my estimate of the deviation is also accurate (sigma = $5k), then 68.2% of the 70m will be paying that much more in taxes.