Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Let's think this through.
There's evidence of voting irregularities and lots of curious coincidences in all of the information.
But I'm clearly swayed because I'm racist and don't want my fellow white man Joe Biden as president.
No wonder the lizards can pull the wool over your eyes so easily.
If only people where as passionate about Electoral Fraud in our own elections
And yes there was with russian interference.
And yes there was with russian interference.
This sounds like a xenophobic conspiracy theory.
Especially when an investigation found otherwise.
I'm pretty sure Everton are going to win the league on this occasion. The mathematical and statistical evidence will put the case beyond any doubt, but courts still want a witness to corroborate the math for some inane reason probably linking back to their God delusions.
Witness: I wasn't allowed to watch
Court: So you didn't see fraud, case dismissed.
Witness: I was asked to backdate the ballots
Court: But you didn't actually backdate them, case dismissed.
Witness: I gave a false address to vote whilst out of state
Court: Lock him up, life sentence, but still that's just one person, not enough to change the whole election, case dismissed.
Other Witness: Aight imma head out
Witness: The rate they were counting at, they would have got through 7000 by the morning, but they reported 100,000
Court: So you don't actually know whether they just quickened the pace in the middle of the night, case dismissed.
And so forth. The people will lap it up. Then the marxists will do what they gotta do over the next four years.
The Republicans are prepared to accept the votes in the Senate, which they won, and the House of Representatives, which they gained, but are not prepared to accept the Presidential election result. All votes were on the same ballot.
I wonder why.
Fraudsters are generally lazy. I'd imagine the majority of the fraudulent votes didn't even bother with the senate.
I want more comments from the custodian of truth and democracy, Mr Lukashenko.
Lukashenko wins 80% of the vote:
It was rigged! He's a dictator! Oh the humanity! Won't somebody think of the children!
Biden wins 80% of the vote in Pennsylvania:
Seems legit.
So they cheated the DNC primaries 2016, 2020, elections 2020 but decided not to bother with senate this time out because they are lazy..
Given they rigged the election, the chance of them doing it this way out of laziness is = 10% for arguments sake, or whatever other tiny % you have in mind. What you are doing is saying look, 10%, look how unlikely that is, of course it never happened, it wasn't rigged man, it's like a 10% chance! That's a flaw in your mathematical thinking. The way to actually think about this is given x, y and z, the chance of them rigging the election is = 99%. You've been presented with plenty of x, y and z. Yet instead of using it to assess the rigging probability, you're jumping ahead to the mathematically flawed 10% argument in order to dismiss the rigging. Not sure if that makes sense to you, but it's what's going on in your brain.
Does the stuff you write even make sense to you?
10% of me thinks you been spending too long in crappy python scripts for far too long and lost touch with reality.
Last edited:
Of course. If you think about it you'll learn something you currently don't know about probabilities as well as realising I'm right. Or don't and you won't.
Evidence Firmino is our striker: he plays for us, his player registration is legit, we remember him signing for us, we see him every week, and so forth. x, y and z confirming the obvious.
Given he is our striker, the chance he will score next week is 1%. If he wasn't our striker the chance would be 0%. Your objections all come down to comparing 1% to 0%, and deciding there is a high chance he isn't our striker. That's just dumb. Then you use this dumb conclusion to then dismiss x, y and z as bullshit because of how unlikely it is that he is our striker. Flawed.
Given he is our striker, the chance he will score next week is 1%. If he wasn't our striker the chance would be 0%. Your objections all come down to comparing 1% to 0%, and deciding there is a high chance he isn't our striker. That's just dumb. Then you use this dumb conclusion to then dismiss x, y and z as bullshit because of how unlikely it is that he is our striker. Flawed.
Think will be fine, likely to learn more from a KS2 book than Dominic Cummings think tank data science reject. Thanks though...
Last edited:
Are you saying they are three separate groups ?
It was done by a secret supercomputer. So, whoever controls the computer done it.
He didn't win 80% of the vote in PA. He won 80% of the vote in one democratic county in PA.
You must be new to following geopolitics on this local a level in the US, but because Trump's nonsense has him stumbling into the area and you crawl around smelling his farts, here you are. Since you are new, allow me to fill you in. Every American has seen these splits before. It happens every fucking election.
The western part of PA, like most post-industrial parts of the NE and midatlantic, is in a near terminal decline, and is some of the staunchest trump support I've ever seen. Some of these counties went for trump at 75% plus, some at more than 80%. When the in-person vote was immediately counted, without the mail-in vote, the margins in some of these counties were 90% Did you bat an eye at that? Was it evidence of fraud?
The only difference here was a question of narrative. There ought not be a narrative structure to counting, but because different votes were counted at different times, there was here. Otherwise this election would have never been seen as particularly close. Several states would have been called much earlier, and Biden would have probably locked up the call that night.
In PA the number of mail in votes was staggeringly democratic. More than three times as many democratic mail in ballots were requested, and a higher percentage were returned by democrats. No one really liked Biden, but a supermajority of people in most large cities in the Northeast fucking HATES trump. Add that into your model of all human behavior.
https://www.politico.com/states/new...ni-press-conference-is-a-sex-offender-1335241
Man featured at Giuliani press conference is a convicted sex offender
By MATT FRIEDMAN 11/09/2020 09:28 AM EST Updated 11/09/2020 11:30 AM EST
The first person Rudy Giuliani, the attorney for President Donald Trump, called up as a witness to baseless allegations of vote counting shenanigans in Philadelphia during a press conference last week is a sex offender who for years has been a perennial candidate in New Jersey.
“It’s such a shame. This is a democracy,” Daryl Brooks, who said he was a GOP poll watcher, said at the press conference, held at Four Seasons Total Landscaping in Northeast Philadelphia. “They did not allow us to see anything. Was it corrupt or not? But give us an opportunity as poll watchers to view all the documents — all of the ballots.”
Trenton political insiders watched with bemusement as Brooks took the podium.
Brooks was incarcerated in the 1990s on charges of sexual assault, lewdness and endangering the welfare of a minor for exposing himself to two girls ages 7 and 11, according to news accounts.
Brooks has run for various offices, including U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives.
“I started watching it and all of a sudden I was like, ‘there’s New Jersey’s perennial candidate claiming to live in Philadelphia and Giuliani claiming him to be a poll watcher and Philadelphia resident," Trenton Mayor Reed Gusciora said in a phone interview.
James Gee, chief of staff to U.S. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), also said he immediately recognized Brooks.
“Yeah, I know Daryl. It’s so fitting that he would be there,” Gee said.
Gee said he believed Brooks was hired for Hillary Clinton‘s campaign in 2016.
“People don’t pay attention to who they hire. They’re just trying to get bodies, particularly if it’s a white organizer,” said Gee, who’s Black. “And this time apparently, I guess he was on the Republican side of the watchers.“
Brooks said in a phone interview late Monday morning that he did not know if Giuliani knew about his conviction, but said he didn’t think it was relevant.
“I’m not sure, but all he asked — he was asking about the truth. I told him the truth and the other ones told him the truth,” Brooks said.
He also said he did not work directly for Clinton’s campaign in 2016, but for a third-party, pro-Clinton group he declined to name.
Brooks continued to deny the charges he was convicted of, alleging the victims were the children of neighborhood drug dealers he had targeted in his community activism. He also alleged Trenton politicians he criticized played a role as well.
“I went to prison for three-and-a-half years. That’s what they said I was did. I was 25-years-old,” Brooks said. “I was an activist always doing the right thing. They lied on me. The cops set me up.”
The conviction has never been reversed.
Man featured at Giuliani press conference is a convicted sex offender
By MATT FRIEDMAN 11/09/2020 09:28 AM EST Updated 11/09/2020 11:30 AM EST
The first person Rudy Giuliani, the attorney for President Donald Trump, called up as a witness to baseless allegations of vote counting shenanigans in Philadelphia during a press conference last week is a sex offender who for years has been a perennial candidate in New Jersey.
“It’s such a shame. This is a democracy,” Daryl Brooks, who said he was a GOP poll watcher, said at the press conference, held at Four Seasons Total Landscaping in Northeast Philadelphia. “They did not allow us to see anything. Was it corrupt or not? But give us an opportunity as poll watchers to view all the documents — all of the ballots.”
Trenton political insiders watched with bemusement as Brooks took the podium.
Brooks was incarcerated in the 1990s on charges of sexual assault, lewdness and endangering the welfare of a minor for exposing himself to two girls ages 7 and 11, according to news accounts.
Brooks has run for various offices, including U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives.
“I started watching it and all of a sudden I was like, ‘there’s New Jersey’s perennial candidate claiming to live in Philadelphia and Giuliani claiming him to be a poll watcher and Philadelphia resident," Trenton Mayor Reed Gusciora said in a phone interview.
James Gee, chief of staff to U.S. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), also said he immediately recognized Brooks.
“Yeah, I know Daryl. It’s so fitting that he would be there,” Gee said.
Gee said he believed Brooks was hired for Hillary Clinton‘s campaign in 2016.
“People don’t pay attention to who they hire. They’re just trying to get bodies, particularly if it’s a white organizer,” said Gee, who’s Black. “And this time apparently, I guess he was on the Republican side of the watchers.“
Brooks said in a phone interview late Monday morning that he did not know if Giuliani knew about his conviction, but said he didn’t think it was relevant.
“I’m not sure, but all he asked — he was asking about the truth. I told him the truth and the other ones told him the truth,” Brooks said.
He also said he did not work directly for Clinton’s campaign in 2016, but for a third-party, pro-Clinton group he declined to name.
Brooks continued to deny the charges he was convicted of, alleging the victims were the children of neighborhood drug dealers he had targeted in his community activism. He also alleged Trenton politicians he criticized played a role as well.
“I went to prison for three-and-a-half years. That’s what they said I was did. I was 25-years-old,” Brooks said. “I was an activist always doing the right thing. They lied on me. The cops set me up.”
The conviction has never been reversed.
Similar threads
