I don't know how you discerned that from my post.
Can sex offenders not tell the truth every now and again ?
Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
I don't know how you discerned that from my post.
Can sex offenders not tell the truth every now and again ?
I'm sorry if you're offended that I'm biased against paedos.
Fucking trump weirdos have been pointing and shouting paedo at just about everyone they disagree with and you've got an actual convicted one as the first person talking about voter fraud, an actual nonce, and you don't seem to mind. Lols.
Fucking trump weirdos have been pointing and shouting paedo at just about everyone they disagree with and you've got an actual convicted one as the first person talking about voter fraud, an actual nonce, and you don't seem to mind. Lols.
So you have decided that voter fraud isn't an issue because a paedo thinks it happened.
You're a fool.
It's obvious that most people who want Trump out don't care one way or the other - they'll take the win whichever way it comes.
So what end game are you pursuing here?
I'm asking questions, suppose like Keni I'm trying to figure out the end goal here.
Fair. Still Pennsylvania is the court case they will definitely lose and nobody will take your insight into account.
Also fair that the math for the Michigan ballots remains impossible to explain without fraud.
Biden's win in PA will end up being closer to 80,000. Good luck with that.
Have you sent Trump money yet? He needs it for this important effort!
As if, he should be sending me money for services rendered.
Sure they're all invalidated because one paedo is a witness.
The votes are in and counted. Then the Secretary of State has to certify those votes are genuine by the first week of December. So despite the fake news, they need to finish off the counts and recounts and get everything signed off pretty sharpish. Big D has employed lawyers to challenge the mail in ballots, get the courts to rule they are illegal, and therefore prevent the Secretary of State from signing them off. Then when the electoral college meet, if Big D prevented enough certifications in enough states, Biden, nor indeed Big D, will have reached 270. That means the election is scrapped. At that point the new president is chosen by the House of Representatives, who will obviously choose Big D. Farky can correct me if I misunderstand their silly constitutional rules.
So the fraud allegations are to challenge the mail ballots. They will do that through all the stuff Rosco and Dantes have been telling you in this thread. Dead people voting. Poll watchers being prevented form observing the count. Software glitches. A lack of a paper trail proving votes belong to actual people. Witnesses saying they backdated votes. Their idea is if you cast doubt on a batch of votes, the court will say they're illegal, and they can't be certified. I for one know courts, and know they'll bend over backwards and twist their legs the wrong way around to avoid making that finding and starting a civil war. The only place they will have no choice but to chuck mail in ballots out is Pennsylvania because their dumbass board of electors decided to break the law by going over their State Legislators head, which is unconstitutional, so they don't have a leg to stand on.
Exactly, you love that guy, he doesn't strike the fear of God into you, just a harmless mong to you. Now look at the equivalent versions of that guy on the marxist left, and tell me you're not terrified of what might come to pass.
So the Bilderberg lizards have Obama and Starmer in place, let's see how Brexit gets stopped now.
Last edited:
Sorry, non capito niente.
Oh soz I was on about Obama's ability to derail Brexit as even if he is made ambassador it'll be a while after the deadline.
On election night:
(1) By bedtime Big D was miles ahead (leading to my premature ejactulation in this thread, as well as the bookies I might add)
(2) During the middle of the night Biden made unheard of comebacks thanks to the mail in ballots being heavily in his favour
(3) Somebody on twitter took screenshots of a dump of 130k mail in ballots being 100% all for Biden (this was later explained as human error)
(4) Someone else posted the graph of vote totals changing over time, and Biden's did a vertical overtake around 4am (which made my jaw drop as that just doesn't happen in real world data, ever)
So all of the above is what kicked off the claims of a fraud. The next allegations over the following days off the top of my head:
(1) Thousands of dead people being registered to vote, and therefore sent out mail in ballot request forms
(2) Individual cases of dead people who when checked on the website were shown to have voted (websites have now deleted the records of these people)
(3) Postal ballots found in trash
(4) A whistleblower postman saying he was told to backdate mail ballots to make it look like they arrived on time on election day (FBI investigating now)
(5) Software glitch in counting machine which flipped 6000 Bid D votes into Biden votes (this was corrected later)
(6) Poll watchers being refused access to watch the ballots being counted in numerous states
(7) Voters in Trump leaning places being given sharpies to fill in the ballots, which subsequently failed to read (this case was dismissed, no idea if they will pursue it)
(8) 450k ballots that only had a mark for biden, none of the other matters were voted on
(9) A shit load of mathematical impossibilities (https://theredelephants.com/there-is-undeniable-mathematical-evidence-the-election-is-being-stolen/)
The real court cases won't pursue much of that, it's just to make it obvious to people dodgy shit went on so they accept them winning the case on technicalities. The main technicality is the mail in ballots had to be received by 8pm election night, have to be traceable to actual voters, and have to have been observed by poll watchers. They'll argue those laws / rules were not followed and try to get the ballots thrown out. The reason they weren't followed in reality is because the democrats were up to (1) to (9) above. The fake news are saying there is no ethidence of that wah wah wah. That's not what they need evidence of though. They're going for legal arguments and technicalities. At least they should be if their lawyers have a brain.
So trump's lawyers are suing on technicalities? Is that what you're saying?
I don't think they'll win. but it's not impossible, and Big D is a winner. I don't think it's dawned on people yet that winning the court case means the election is scrapped, and Big D will get voted back in by the house of representatives. Even if he loses, this litigation sets a pathway up for future rich candidates to block the certification procedure, get enough electoral college votes thrown out, and win the presidency based upon being a boss in court. I'm I can't tell you how happy this makes me, something I never even dreamed of before Big D had the balls to try it.
Yes. But there wouldn't be any technicalities (i.e. rules not being followed by the counters) if the democrats didn't commit fraud. Unless of course they are just that fucking dumb and incompetent that they received millions of genuine Biden votes, and then fucked up the procedures for counting them legally due to being fucking stupid.
Similar threads
