• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

I don't get it. If there's evidence of crime why go after technicalities?

They'll report the evidence of crime to Barr, it's up to him to send the people to jail (but that treacherous son of a bitch doesn't appear to be lifting a finger). Big D doesn't care about the crimes, he's paying his lawyers $1000/hr, not his problem or responsibility to spend his money to go after criminals. He wants to win the presidency, and that means proving the consequences of those crimes.

For instance, if you proved all those crimes happened beyond doubt. But the counters then followed the correct procedures and threw out the tainted ballots themselves, then the election stands despite the fraud. So it's irrelevant to Big D.
 
For the secretary of state to certify the ballots, it's a positive affirmation that "I know these ballots which have been counted are all genuine votes". The onus is on the counting officials to have the correct paper trail to back up the count (e.g. cross referencing votes with voter id's, signatures, proven times of arrival, etc.). Big D just needs to demand it, if it's produced then he needs to invalidate it by saying the paperwork was not produced using the correct procedure so it's illegal. Whatever it takes to stop those votes being certified.

But you turn on Fox News, and it's Key Stage 2 political science, you vote, we count, done, we have winner ding ding ding. As if it's that simple. Y'all must have forgotten George W.
 
So when Bid D was tweeting "STOP THE COUNT" and everyone was laughing at him, making memes, dracula jokes, thinking he was saying that because he wanted to stop the count while he was ahead, so that he could win. No, that's not at all what he meant. He meant stop the count, because you are counting without following the correct procedure. He really is not as dumb as you believe from the fake news. They've been filing lawsuits about this since way before the election. He knows what he is doing.
 
Barr isn't going to do anything meaningful because nobody in the republican party needs trump anymore, and they know he lost fairly. They don't want to anger his base, or have him run again. They have also been given some things they really want, namely more power to redistrict so they can once again make their vote easier. They have won the popular vote once in the last 8 elections but gerrymandering gives them a grip on power. He's stupid and petty, but many in the machine are not. They are currently working on outmanoeuvring him so that they can kick him to the curb and move on. It shouldn't prove to difficult because he's tremendously easy to manipulate, like all pathological narcisists.
 
So when Bid D was tweeting "STOP THE COUNT" and everyone was laughing at him, making memes, dracula jokes, thinking he was saying that because he wanted to stop the count while he was ahead, so that he could win. No, that's not at all what he meant. He meant stop the count, because you are counting without following the correct procedure. He really is not as dumb as you believe from the fake news. They've been filing lawsuits about this since way before the election. He knows what he is doing.

We know what he's doing. He knew he'd be ahead day of then fall behind. His actions were too predictable to be effective. He's just trying to pay off some debts and keep a few hardcore people on the hook so he can see about making some sort of new network that will totally fail like all of his business ventures.
 
For the secretary of state to certify the ballots, it's a positive affirmation that "I know these ballots which have been counted are all genuine votes". The onus is on the counting officials to have the correct paper trail to back up the count (e.g. cross referencing votes with voter id's, signatures, proven times of arrival, etc.). Big D just needs to demand it, if it's produced then he needs to invalidate it by saying the paperwork was not produced using the correct procedure so it's illegal. Whatever it takes to stop those votes being certified.

But you turn on Fox News, and it's Key Stage 2 political science, you vote, we count, done, we have winner ding ding ding. As if it's that simple. Y'all must have forgotten George W.

I still don't understand. If there's evidence of a crime just report it and get it sorted
 
Barr isn't going to do anything meaningful because nobody in the republican party needs trump anymore, and they know he lost fairly. They don't want to anger his base, or have him run again. They have also been given some things they really want, namely more power to redistrict so they can once again make their vote easier. They have won the popular vote once in the last 8 elections but gerrymandering gives them a grip on power. He's stupid and petty, but many in the machine are not. They are currently working on outmanoeuvring him so that they can kick him to the curb and move on. It shouldn't prove to difficult because he's tremendously easy to manipulate, like all pathological narcisists.

Shouldn't that tell you you're on the wrong side?
 
When did the Trumplords turn on Barr? I know he's deep state as all fuck but he was their poster boy a few minutes ago
 
When did the Trumplords turn on Barr? I know he's deep state as all fuck but he was their poster boy a few minutes ago

Have they? Barr was never my friend and things would never have come to this if I had been in his place.
 
I'm pretty sure Everton are going to win the league on this occasion. The mathematical and statistical evidence will put the case beyond any doubt, but courts still want a witness to corroborate the math for some inane reason probably linking back to their God delusions.

Witness: I wasn't allowed to watch
Court: So you didn't see fraud, case dismissed.

Witness: I was asked to backdate the ballots
Court: But you didn't actually backdate them, case dismissed.

Witness: I gave a false address to vote whilst out of state
Court: Lock him up, life sentence, but still that's just one person, not enough to change the whole election, case dismissed.
Other Witness: Aight imma head out

Witness: The rate they were counting at, they would have got through 7000 by the morning, but they reported 100,000
Court: So you don't actually know whether they just quickened the pace in the middle of the night, case dismissed.

And so forth. The people will lap it up. Then the marxists will do what they gotta do over the next four years.
Witness, caught making shit up.
 
@Farkmaster I hope you kept your emigration plans on ice, get the fuck out of there man! The senate might be gone in January. In fact it probably will be.
 
She then proceeds to lay out all the evidence and legal argument.




Which was not reported by any respectable news outlet, who all properly and thankfully cut her off, and there is therefore no credible evidence that she said any of the things she is saying whatsoever. Social Credit +1 dantes.
 
There were only a lot of claims that they didnt back up with anything. Just like its been since Trump started this.
 
But you can't back up the claims that they can't back up the claims. I think this is how it works

Pfizer claimed they have a vaccine. Zero evidence to back it up.

Boris claimed to be pleased for Biden. Zero evidence to back it up.

Biden claimed covid would be top priority for his taskforce. Zero evidence to prove this.

Biden implores everyone to wear masks. Zero supporting evidence.

They are just using this pathetic no ethidence wah wah wah ner ner ner bullshit excuse to not report news that will cost them revenues. It's verbally impossible to say something and simultaneously prove what you are saying. You understand this right?
 
He didn't win 80% of the vote in PA. He won 80% of the vote in one democratic county in PA.

You must be new to following geopolitics on this local a level in the US, but because Trump's nonsense has him stumbling into the area and you crawl around smelling his farts, here you are. Since you are new, allow me to fill you in. Every American has seen these splits before. It happens every fucking election.

The western part of PA, like most post-industrial parts of the NE and midatlantic, is in a near terminal decline, and is some of the staunchest trump support I've ever seen. Some of these counties went for trump at 75% plus, some at more than 80%. When the in-person vote was immediately counted, without the mail-in vote, the margins in some of these counties were 90% Did you bat an eye at that? Was it evidence of fraud?

The only difference here was a question of narrative. There ought not be a narrative structure to counting, but because different votes were counted at different times, there was here. Otherwise this election would have never been seen as particularly close. Several states would have been called much earlier, and Biden would have probably locked up the call that night.

In PA the number of mail in votes was staggeringly democratic. More than three times as many democratic mail in ballots were requested, and a higher percentage were returned by democrats. No one really liked Biden, but a supermajority of people in most large cities in the Northeast fucking HATES trump. Add that into your model of all human behavior.


There is a 10% chance that Dante's read 80% of your post and concluded that world is probably v shaped with an angle of 40°. Why do you even bother?
 
Pfizer claimed they have a vaccine. Zero evidence to back it up.

Boris claimed to be pleased for Biden. Zero evidence to back it up.

Biden claimed covid would be top priority for his taskforce. Zero evidence to prove this.

Biden implores everyone to wear masks. Zero supporting evidence.

They are just using this pathetic no ethidence wah wah wah ner ner ner bullshit excuse to not report news that will cost them revenues. It's verbally impossible to say something and simultaneously prove what you are saying. You understand this right?


Yeah, that's why you can string related sentences together into cohesive arguments that both persuade, interpret and mobilize evidence. Give it a try some time!
 
There is a 10% chance that Dante's read 80% of your post and concluded that world is probably v shaped with an angle of 40°. Why do you even bother?

Oh, I dont' know, my life's work for the last three years was chucked in a bin. It's either arguing with idiots and nutters or contemplate throwing myself out a window.
 
Last edited:
@Farkmaster I hope you kept your emigration plans on ice, get the fuck out of there man! The senate might be gone in January. In fact it probably will be.

It's a very, very right leaning country where rural areas are over represented.

Ive not felt at home here ever because of the politics, but what you aren't getting is that trump isn't a different kettle of fish because of his politics. I know the politics here will never represent my views. I gave up on that ages ago, and center right biden isn't going to change that. He was defeated not because his politics are unpalatable to america. Unfortunately they aren't.

He was defeated because he doesn't respect any of the unwritten rules that keep a structurally unsound state like the usa in some sham of functioning order. He's doing it right now. He does it for no purpose badly, but again and again he takes the last little shreds of civil discourse and sacred ground and gets his fake tan all over them like a bloated banana slug.

What he's doing now won't work, but fits with his instinct to hold leverage on anything. He won't do anything because he should. This isn't some brilliant hard noses business strategy, it's the actions of a young child with shit parents.

But every taboo he's destroyed, his party has reinforced, every thing they've reinforced, is introduced into play. He's ruined so many useful traditions.

America will obviously have a fascist dictator at some stage. Trump cleared some of the way there, for no real reason but narcissism. He didn't even want the job.
 
Back
Top Bottom