Big D vs Twitter

[Rosco]

Again that's not true. I'm the only one here that vocally backs Big D. Rosco seems like a dirty socialist to me. The only reason we are in agreement here is because it's clear the vote count was fraudulent. And that Hunter Biden was a paedophile.

I am a bit of a dirty socialist.

It's obvious the election was rigged by the lizards so we could have Creepy Joe as the weekend at Bernie's president.

There'll be another war soon, and the lizards will continue to enrich themselves by enforcing regime change in other countries and when things become privatised amazingly they'll get the contracts and the spoils.

 

[Rosco]

Thanks Dantes.

Although - that article states that the tie between the company and Pelosi is that Dominion hired a Lobbying Company that has a former Pelosi Chief of Staff as one of the lobbyists on the account.

Dominion Voting Systems is not listed as a Company that Pelosi has shares or ownership in - my source for that is opensecrets.org

Also - the article mentions the original source of the article as “The World Tribune” - which Mediabiasfactcheck.com list as a “Questionable source based on far right bias (propaganda), and poor sourcing and misleading science, as well as a lack of ownership transparency.”

So - Dominion is indeed the company that services the voting software in those states- but if the best a “news” outlet that lists its content partners as The Drudge Report, Washington TIMES, Brietbart, etc is some sort of six degrees of separation, then you’ll forgive me for being a little sceptical.

I’m sure Ross’s extensive research will be able to shed some light on this - happy to be shown were I’ve gone wrong.

It's Feinstein that owns Dominion. Not Pelosi.

 

[dantes]

You do know that you shouldn't be using 'registered voters' don't you ? Clearly not. I'll let you go and find out why.

No, you'll have to elaborate.

 

[Frogfish]

No, you'll have to elaborate.

Michigan now allows Same Day registration. We always encourage voters to get registered ahead of time. A good place to start the registration process is the Michigan Voter Information Center and can be found at mvic.sos.state.mi.us.

BTW the same goes for Wisconsin and a number of other states. The official number of Registered Voters are the pre-election numbers. Many many people registered and voted during the 1 or 2 weeks (or whatever it was since it varied state by state) permitted to vote and these don't appear in the pre-election figures.

Voter fraud claim fail.

 

[Lippy]

These irregularities (reported by obscure local news stations) are getting quite regular. Perhaps they ought to be called regularities?

Wow. That's scandalous. Amongst 800+ stolen pieces of mail officials found three yes THREE absentee ballots. Call the election off immediately

 

[dantes]

Michigan now allows Same Day registration. We always encourage voters to get registered ahead of time. A good place to start the registration process is the Michigan Voter Information Center and can be found at mvic.sos.state.mi.us.

Ah that's irrelevant then. The mail-in ballot request forms were posted out and received back by already registered voters, in the numbers I gave.

Requested means registered voters have mailed in an application or otherwise asked for a mail-in ballot to be sent to them.
3.32m

Returned or accepted means a voter received a mail ballot and successfully returned it to the elections office to be counted.
2.84m

Rejected means a ballot was not processed or counted because of a voter technical error. In some states, voters are notified and these ballots can be corrected.
No rejection data yet

 

[Rosco]

It's amazing how the media were all reporting about the problems with the voting software and machinery , but did so from the point of view of China or Russia interfering.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/3kx...-left-exposed-online-despite-official-denials

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/all/ch...ng-scrutiny-inside-america-s-biggest-n1104516

 

[dantes]

And ? Your comment was not about mail-in, it was comparing registered voters with actual votes.

No, (1) it was to show that more of the people who requested a mail in ballot were republicans, (2) the vast majority of those mail in ballots were returned and counted, (3) if you assume the ones that weren't returned were ALL republicans that is still nowhere near enough to explain why creepy joe won almost all of these mail in votes, (4) the only explanation is fraud, or else registered republicans in large swathes suddenly decided to vote for Joe.

 

[Hansern]

Thanks Dantes.

Although - that article states that the tie between the company and Pelosi is that Dominion hired a Lobbying Company that has a former Pelosi Chief of Staff as one of the lobbyists on the account.

Dominion Voting Systems is not listed as a Company that Pelosi has shares or ownership in - my source for that is opensecrets.org

Also - the article mentions the original source of the article as “The World Tribune” - which Mediabiasfactcheck.com list as a “Questionable source based on far right bias (propaganda), and poor sourcing and misleading science, as well as a lack of ownership transparency.”

So - Dominion is indeed the company that services the voting software in those states- but if the best a “news” outlet that lists its content partners as The Drudge Report, Washington TIMES, Brietbart, etc is some sort of six degrees of separation, then you’ll forgive me for being a little sceptical.

I’m sure Ross’s extensive research will be able to shed some light on this - happy to be shown were I’ve gone wrong.

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/wh...not-avid-technologies-not-richard-blum.11445/

 

[dantes]

Wow. That's scandalous. Amongst 800+ stolen pieces of mail officials found three yes THREE absentee ballots. Call the election off immediately

Postal workers steal mail. They're more likely to steal mail from wealthy old people who still get bank statements through the post. Wealthy old people are republicans. Those three ballots were for Trump, and you god damn know it!

 

[Frogfish]

No, (1) it was to show that more of the people who requested a mail in ballot were republicans, (2) the vast majority of those mail in ballots were returned and counted, (3) if you assume the ones that weren't returned were ALL republicans that is still nowhere near enough to explain why creepy joe won almost all of these mail in votes, (4) the only explanation is fraud, or else registered republicans in large swathes suddenly decided to vote for Joe.

Name your sources.

Because if that was even remotely true then Trump would have been all over it ... and he hasn't.

 

[StevieM]

It's Feinstein that owns Dominion. Not Pelosi.

That would be why I couldn’t find it in Pelosi’s info then.

Mind you it’s not in Diane Feinstein’s listing on opensecret.org either.

Also apparently debunked is the false claim that Dominion is owned by Avid Technologies which is in turn owned by her husband Richard Blum.

So what I’m seeing is Feinstein’s husband has a share of a company (Blum Capital) that has a share in another company (Avid) that has no connection to Dominion. There’s some suggestion that various companies owned by Blum have a combined 60% ownership in Avid - but I haven’t seen any evidence to support that Avid owns Dominion.

The source of this rumour appears to be something called The Populist Press - which is a delightful little Site that’s heavy on Steve Bannon stuff and assorted other right wing conspiracy theories.

There’s also an article on there mentioning Benford’s law - which you mentioned earlier.

Here’s the link if anyone wants to have a look - you’ll find a few other themes that have been mentioned in this thread by mainly two people :
https://populist.press/

 

[dantes]

Name your sources.

Because if that was even remotely true then Trump would have been all over it ... and he hasn't.

Scroll down to Michigan:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/04/mail-in-ballot-tracker-us-election-2020


Scroll down to the second image also Michigan (I don't vouch for all of the mathematics on the rest of this link, it's good, but nowhere near as good as I am):
https://theredelephants.com/there-is-undeniable-mathematical-evidence-the-election-is-being-stolen/

 

[dantes]

That would be why I couldn’t find it in Pelosi’s info then.

Mind you it’s not in Diane Feinstein’s listing on opensecret.org either.

Also apparently debunked is the false claim that Dominion is owned by Avid Technologies which is in turn owned by her husband Richard Blum.

So what I’m seeing is Feinstein’s husband has a share of a company (Blum Capital) that has a share in another company (Avid) that has no connection to Dominion. There’s some suggestion that various companies owned by Blum have a combined 60% ownership in Avid - but I haven’t seen any evidence to support that Avid owns Dominion.

The source of this rumour appears to be something called The Populist Press - which is a delightful little Site that’s heavy on Steve Bannon stuff and assorted other right wing conspiracy theories.

There’s also an article on there mentioning Benford’s law - which you mentioned earlier.

Here’s the link if anyone wants to have a look - you’ll find a few other themes that have been mentioned in this thread by mainly two people :
https://populist.press/

Benford's law is a mathematical thing, comparing the expected distribution of numbers (0's, 1's, 2's, etc) in naturally occuring datasets to artificial datasets. The SEC use it to check for falsified accounting data. I told you a few days ago this is what I'd do, and surprise surprise the autistics are now doing it, I'm still way ahead of them which is good to know.

 

[dantes]

StevieM: frantically going over the accounts of his pub (money laundering front to fund his expensive wine habit) to make sure he didn't fuck up.

Dantes: you're on your own, even I can't take on the SEC in court, I'm out.

 

[StevieM]

StevieM: frantically going over the accounts of his pub (money laundering front to fund his expensive wine habit) to make sure he didn't fuck up.

Dantes: you're on your own, even I can't take on the SEC in court, I'm out.

Fake news Dantes - I left the pub game years ago.

 

[Frogfish]

Scroll down to Michigan:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/04/mail-in-ballot-tracker-us-election-2020

Scroll down to the second image also Michigan (I don't vouch for all of the mathematics on the rest of this link, it's good, but nowhere near as good as I am):
https://theredelephants.com/there-is-undeniable-mathematical-evidence-the-election-is-being-stolen/

OK firstly the Red Elephant is unsurprisingly a Republican conspiracy site (and now we know where you've been getting a lot of your graphs!) so we know what to expect there. They even go on and on about the now debunked Biden 150k vote dump.

Secondly mail-In votes don't have the party support noted for obvious reasons and those votes are counted after the Election Day votes, along with absentee votes and walk-in voters from pre-election day (most states don't allow counting until the day of the election), so it's very difficult to differentiate but does account for the late Democrat surge ... something that becomes obvious when, as I said earlier, it seems only the conspiracy theorists are hounding this whilst the Republican Party have nothing to say on it for, one would assume, obvious reasons.

 

[StevieM]

Benford's law is a mathematical thing, comparing the expected distribution of numbers (0's, 1's, 2's, etc) in naturally occuring datasets to artificial datasets. The SEC use it to check for falsified accounting data. I told you a few days ago this is what I'd do, and surprise surprise the autistics are now doing it, I'm still way ahead of them which is good to know.

I know very roughly what it is - but I’m sure we’ll be treated to more detail as to what insight it can give us over the next month.

 

[dantes]

Let me just remind you how smart I am. This autistic has plotted the mail in ballot gains for Biden (y axis) against how far ahead he was before the middle of the night counting session (x axis). It shows that when the mail in ballots arrived in the middle of the night, by some amazing stroke of luck Biden was winning a far higher proportion in the wards where he was behind (outliers in top left), and far less in places he already had in the bag (bottom right).

That's banged to rights fraud in the eyes of a court. The autistics are frothing over it on twitter. But I'm dantes. The early votes are sampled from a finite pool of rednecks in the ward. Once you REMOVE those votes out of the sample (i.e remove republican votes from the pool at which Biden is now going to be behind), then the distribution of the remaining pool has to be updated, because it is no longer representative of the initial distribution of the entire pool. When you do that Biden will come out ahead just by natural chance (he has more dumbass democrats left behind in the ward yet to be sampled from).

Data scientist don't understand what they're doing when they take samples and overlook shit like this. They assume an infinite sample size with a constant distribution. They're not scientists. I see these subtle things instantly because I am. Don't ever doubt how far beyond these conspiracy nutjobs I actually am.

 

[dantes]

OK firstly the Red Elephant is unsurprisingly a Republican conspiracy site (and now we know where you've been getting a lot of your graphs!) so we know what to expect there. They even go on and on about the now debunked Biden 150k vote dump.

Secondly mail-In votes don't have the party support noted for obvious reasons and those votes are counted after the Election Day votes, along with absentee votes and walk-in voters from pre-election day (most states don't allow counting until the day of the election), so it's very difficult to differentiate but does account for the late Democrat surge ... something that becomes obvious when, as I said earlier, it seems only the conspiracy theorists are hounding this whilst the Republican Party have nothing to say on it for, one would assume, obvious reasons.

Perhaps the guardian has made a false distinction then. My interpretation is that Michigan sends out forms to all registered voters asking whether they wanted a mail in ballot or not (obviously the postman steals a bunch of republican ones). The registered voters then sent it back or reply online or something saying yes send me a ballot (41% - 39% of these requests where registered republicans to registered democrats from the conspiracy people's screenshot). Then the guardian says that the total number of these requests was 3.2m and 2.8m were successfully returned (400k were never sent back or more likely stolen by the postman).

If the guardian is conflating the returned mail in ballots and lumping them in with people who hand-delivered ballots on the day, which were counted in a different bucket, that's on them.

 

[dantes]

Otherwise as it stands, those numbers definitely show that republicans asked for and returned a far higher proportion of mail in ballots than what came out of the count. As I said, if they suddenly switched allegiances that would explain it, but come on man. Once you go Big D, you don't go back.

 

[dantes]

Aaahhahahaaaaaaaaaahahaaahahahahahhahhaaaaaa you fucking love to see it!!! Social credit -1 dantes, but totally worth it.

 

[Rosco]

That would be why I couldn’t find it in Pelosi’s info then.

Mind you it’s not in Diane Feinstein’s listing on opensecret.org either.

Also apparently debunked is the false claim that Dominion is owned by Avid Technologies which is in turn owned by her husband Richard Blum.

So what I’m seeing is Feinstein’s husband has a share of a company (Blum Capital) that has a share in another company (Avid) that has no connection to Dominion. There’s some suggestion that various companies owned by Blum have a combined 60% ownership in Avid - but I haven’t seen any evidence to support that Avid owns Dominion.

The source of this rumour appears to be something called The Populist Press - which is a delightful little Site that’s heavy on Steve Bannon stuff and assorted other right wing conspiracy theories.

There’s also an article on there mentioning Benford’s law - which you mentioned earlier.

Here’s the link if anyone wants to have a look - you’ll find a few other themes that have been mentioned in this thread by mainly two people :
https://populist.press/

Firstly I've never been in that link and secondly the ownership of Dominion hasn't been debunked.

It confirms that it is in fact owned by Blum, we just don't know whether its 60% or 2% because the ownership of the company is kept secret.

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

Lol @dantes you really are a special needs retard

 

[dantes]

Lol @dantes you really are a special needs retard

Don't make me add you to a list.

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

It’s different Dantes. One was created because you were Jewish and fuckwits wanted you to die. The other is because you’re a hateful twat saying stupid shit that you should be called on later. Don’t be such a Fanny.

 

[Rosco]

President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko commented on the US presidential elections and called them a disgrace, as well as a mockery of democracy. He stated this at a meeting with journalists during his visit to the Belarusian nuclear power plant, BelTA informs.

"The bulwark of democracy. Look what is happening with these elections. This is a disgrace, a mockery of this democracy," Lukashenko said.

He added that the US elections are being held with serious violations, and the Western countries and the OSCE will be afraid to demand re-elections, as they demand from Belarus.



Related: Joe Biden wins U.S. presidential election, CNN projects


"Next week we will see this comedy at the finish line. This is already a comedy and a disgrace for all democracy. And it's good that this happened, that we saw the essence of this democracy. This is chatter. Only the strong and those who can stand firmly are respected in the world. We will stand," Lukashenko summed up.

The presidential elections were held in the USA on November 3. The candidates for the post of the 46th president of the country are Republican and incumbent head of state Donald Trump, as well as Democrat Joe Biden, who is currently the leader of the presidential race.

 

[tomasjj]

Lukashenko - the arbiter of truth when it comes to elections.

 

[rubans]

Well president of Belarus, the standard bearer for democracy right there.
He does have one big similarity to Trump and his supporters, not being able to accept a result though...

 

[Rosco]

It's like someone said earlier, people who are capable of finding fraud in an election are probably commiting it themselves

Who would know more than Lukashenko ?