• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

I think it has been looked at and given that it's all sourced from anonymous blogs and disseminated by a cult that unless something more compelling comes along they're not reporting on it. That's kinda normal.

Compelling is one way to describe the text messages between his soon to be suicided son and granddaughter.
 
Well it was in the first instance. And when noone picked that up the mysterious water damaged laptop appeared. It smells of bullshit, so it probably is. Although it might not be.
 
Possibly so, but that doesn't justify just ignoring something that could make it way worse.
Perhaps it does make it worse, but this is stuff being reported by privately owned businesses, while the other is the actual government disenfranchising people. I know which is the bigger offence.
 
It's barely been 24 hours since you were totally wrong about the lost in the mail documents.

I look forward to the next Tucker Carlson show were he reveals these documents that will "blow up" the election.
 
Perhaps it does make it worse, but this is stuff being reported by privately owned businesses, while the other is the actual government disenfranchising people. I know which is the bigger offence.

Do you?

And it's not a matter of 'offence'. I don't need to think the media and social media giants effectively becoming censors is part of some conspiracy to know it would be a disaster for democracy and freedom.

I'm not saying this is defo what's happened btw. But if it did it'd be way worse in effect than making it hard for some poor people to vote.
 
Do you?

And it's not a matter of 'offence'. I don't need to think the media and social media giants effectively becoming censors is part of some conspiracy to know it would be a disaster for democracy and freedom.

I'm not saying this is defo what's happened btw. But if it did it'd be way worse in effect than making it hard for some poor people to vote.

Jack Dorsey has admitted Twitter has a left leaning bias , and actually prevented all NY post links from being posted to stop the Biden story from getting aired.

That has since changed and now they say they were trying to prevent the publication of personal email addresses etc.

Facebook's head of content , would you like to guess which political party she used to work for ?
 
Do you?

And it's not a matter of 'offence'. I don't need to think the media and social media giants effectively becoming censors is part of some conspiracy to know it would be a disaster for democracy and freedom.

I'm not saying this is defo what's happened btw. But if it did it'd be way worse in effect than making it hard for some poor people to vote.
No. One is removing the vote from people by the people who are supposed to represent them. The other is privately owned businesses pushing their own agenda.

It's not just poor people, it disproportionately effects ethnic minorities.
 
When did Guiliani turn into Icke?

He's performing in exactly the same sensationalist way as the fake news do, and for exactly the same reason which is to increase views and get more monies rolling in to his bank account. Yet, when you filter out the noise, you are left with the information about creepy joe which everyone is suddenly going oh shit, nah that's just noise, noise, see, shove it back over there with the other noise, nothing to see here, only noise, orange man bad.
 
But he spends the first bit of a two minute clip asking if we want proof and then just goes off on a stupid rant. I don't really think that's what you need to do to get taken seriously.
 
But he spends the first bit of a two minute clip asking if we want proof and then just goes off on a stupid rant. I don't really think that's what you need to do to get taken seriously.

The information can be reported in one 2 minute clip. Then the people will go off and do their own research on chinese websites, or they'll get on with their day. Either way, Rudy is out of the picture after 2 minutes. That's not enough to get paid. Nobody is going to go back and spend more minutes watching him repeat the same facts again just because he is being serious. What they will go back for is to see his emotional response, and anger, and vile being spewed at the people who they also now hate having gone off and done their research. So he's targeting the audience that will give him repeat views and more income.
 
Thats the usual formula though isnt it. Trump uses the same kind of lingo. "People", "doctors" and "scientists" and then making a claim. When asked who these are to back up said claim, he goes off talking about something else.
 
Trump can claim he was abducted by aliens, it'll be global news, and it would make no difference to the wealth of his citizens. None whatsoever. It really does piss me off how obsessed human beings get with words and opinions, and wanting to know everyone's thoughts about some shit topic of the day. That has no relevance, no utility, no value, aside from some entertainment value perhaps. To decide who to vote for based on words and feels is just dumb.

Transaction 1: Walk up to a random person, pay him £100, he smiles and says he cares about you.
Transaction 2: Walk up to a random person, they pay you £100, then say racist things and brag about how they're rich and grab pussies

Anybody who opts for transaction 1 is a fucking moron who doesn't deserve their vote.
 
The existence of the laptop has been confirmed, it has been confirmed by the CIA and FBI that there's no evidence it is Russian disinformation. People named in the email chains have confirmed the authenticity of the publicly leaked emails. Biden has boasted publicly about doing the things he is accused of doing for his own gain.

Regardless of where it started you either need to be so partisan that you don't want it to shake your faith in your candidate or you just lack the ability to join the dots.

You love joining dots, but each one of them requires significant amounts of analysis in order to be connected in a way that is meaningful right now, and the fbi doesn't want to do any part of that in public given it would influence the election by even having an appearance of impropriety.

Then, you expect biden to answer for questions you think these unsourced emails raise, and so does greenwald absurdly in that piece. Why on earth would biden do that? I wouldn't talk to a policeman about what he found if he searched the trunk of my car without consent.

Aha, you say, so they did find drugs? Well, yes, but no, in this case. You want him to allow a fishing expedition of questions that invite more questions in the lead up to the election, in reference to information sourced in a way that doesn't pass the sniff test.

If we are in the business of connecting dots without proof, it seems obvious to me the info was shopped on the black market then laundered by a willing stooge.

This in keeping with Trump's public floating of both convention and law in seeking help from foreign adversaries, the very thing trump was impeached for.

And that's precisely why it was released by the campaign in the way it was. It is something useful but isn't ultimately that significant, much like Hillary's emails. In that case there was obvious foreign political meddling. Here we have no idea, there's really no evidence either way. The problem for the Republicans is that they didn't spend 30 years hacking down biden because I don't think anyone looked at him ever, and thought, oh yeah, definite political dynasty here.
 
Last edited:
He was impeached for asking Ukraine to investigate what creepy joe was up to there. Kinda had a point didn't he.
 
He was impeached for asking Ukraine to investigate what creepy joe was up to there. Kinda had a point didn't he.

He was impeached because he knew them announcing they were investigating would look bad. The things we know that trump did, to me, are far worse than the things you are hoping that biden did.

But let's just say you are absolutely right. Thank God that isn't how justice works. The ends don't justify the means.
 
It certainly looks like I'm right, which would in turn mean that the FBI had the laptop with all the emails on it, and sat back twiddling their thumbs whilst Trump was being impeached. Not only wasting taxpayer money, but hindering him from focusing on his job as president which was increasing the money the taxpayers had. We're not even close to justice in this matter, not by a long shot.
 
Good exercise to keep his body and mind fit, and probably discussing business at the same time. Perhaps creepy joe should try it, his mind is all but gone.

 
It certainly looks like I'm right, which would in turn mean that the FBI had the laptop with all the emails on it, and sat back twiddling their thumbs whilst Trump was being impeached. Not only wasting taxpayer money, but hindering him from focusing on his job as president which was increasing the money the taxpayers had. We're not even close to justice in this matter, not by a long shot.


Nothing will ever come of this. The only reason it exists at all and you are aware of it is because it's election season. You're a rube.
 


3:02 - how silly of me for thinking fox news might not have been a bunch of pathetic snowflakes all along.
 
The significance of that article isn't to claim that Biden's more corrupt than Trump, but that the media (and the big internet platforms) are now so biased and corrupt that the very idea of fair elections is under threat.

And that's a way bigger issue than just whether one lousy President gets another 4 years or not.


But the media has been skewed in the other direction for so long that it’s a non issue.

You can easily catalogue the amount of right leaning parties that have won power thanks to preferential treatment from the main stream media.

Was happily swept under the carpet previously - whys it an issue now - specifically to this election?
 
#brainwashed

What exactly am I being brainwashed about.

The article clearly states there’s no way of proving the claims that Joe Biden was directly involved - unless he confirms it himself.

That neither proves or disproves anything.

The main point is why the media isn’t focusing on it more - and the answer is - the media has always been partisan- so why do you expect it to be different this time.

I think you’re the one that’s brainwashed, if I’m honest - and I genuinely worry about your mental state.

Sometimes.
 
Back
Top Bottom