Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
I wish it was. No one spends this much time and effort on a wind-up with so little payoff.
No. You're not a mathematician, you don't understand probability or statistics, all you understand is how to regurgitate something and not know what it means.
You claimed that the clots were extremely unlikely to be caused by the vaccine because of those statistics. Months ago you claimed that. I told you that was bullshit and they were caused by the vaccine. Turns out you were wrong. The reason you were wrong is because you have no idea how probability works or you're just too woke to care. Last time we had this exchange, you claimed "oh I never said it was impossible, just extremely unlikely". Laughable levels of dumbness. This time I don't even know what you're claiming. I think you're just lying and writing a post that makes you sound good and makes me sound bad. Whatever. You're an idiot. I'm not. And that's it.
Hahaha up against you nobody has to do anything exceptional to sound good. You're an utter bellend as poster after poster affirms!
However your bellendness aside as usual you ignore the obvious because it doesn't support your stance - the statistics that have proved the miniscule increase in probability from any of these vaccines (348 cases of blood clots after over 37.7 million total doses of the AZ vaccine in the UK. Of the 348 people who developed blood clots, 61 died. That's 0.0000000016% of those inoculated, compare that to 0.009% of the population that die every year for any reason), in relation to the accepted statistics in any demographic of death by an embolism (5th most common cause of death in the UK at 0.0002834% of the population (include those 61 and it is now 0.0002843%) and 5th also in the USA at 0.0003%).
That's what you are railing against because it totally fucks up your crowing and assertions. Not one counter statistic in your post, just the standard Dantes blowhard blah blah blah, because there are no facts to support your position - you are beyond fucked.
Fun fact : # of posters Dantes has called thick/idiot over the past week because their opinion contradicts his own : 5
Dantes: minus 500 social credits
Yeah, the fact is that the blood clots were a result of the vaccine. Do you not understand that? You disagreed at the time because you misinterpreted those statistics you are still quoting. There's nothing more to it than that. I'm not arguing about the percentages you keep quoting. It simply takes me less time to call you an idiot than to physically correct the flaws in your interpretation of those statistics. You can either get butthurt or your can go learn where you went wrong and do better in future.
Dantes . . . what if. . . those people who had an embolism . . . would have had one with, or without the vaccine? What would the statistics show then? I think you believe that this data shows us that the vaccines were all a waste of time and are very dangerous.
In fact, based on the available data, I would strongly recommend that you and your extended family do not get the vaccine. Unless of course, you've already had it - in which case I'm surprised that you did, based on the startling inefficacy of the vaccine and the overwhelming chances that you will die from it.
EDIT: I feel the need to clarify that this is sarcasm. Because Dantes has a a demonstrated inability to interpret many forms of data - including sarcasm.
In fact, based on the available data, I would strongly recommend that you and your extended family do not get the vaccine. Unless of course, you've already had it - in which case I'm surprised that you did, based on the startling inefficacy of the vaccine and the overwhelming chances that you will die from it.
EDIT: I feel the need to clarify that this is sarcasm. Because Dantes has a a demonstrated inability to interpret many forms of data - including sarcasm.
Are you saying that you can't tell, based on the available data?
No, you asked a question about how the statistics would look which I would take the time to answer if you wanted to know. It is interspersed with other sarcastic questions and comments, so I was asking you tell me if the statistics question was also just sarcastic or you actually wanted to know. It seems you don't, which is not a shock.
A few questions for you (that I don't expect you to answer - or to answer dishonestly - because that's your demonstrated MO)
Did you get a vaccine, Rosco? Why? (Since you are a fucking fatso at risk from dying from complications of COVID, I'll wager that you were first in the queue.)
Are you saying that the vaccines should not have been developed?
How many lives did the vaccine save? Does it continue to save?
Christmas tree lights kill more people in the UK every year than several hundred million doses of the vaccine worldwide. Should we ban Christmas tree lights?
Can you point out for me (and the rest of the forum) where I apologized for the CCP? No?
I find it amusing that you want to be bitch slapped around some more.
Since you are purportedly a genius, and have told us, time and again, that you have a unique ability to interpret data that others cannot, I find it a little surprising that this one stumps the fuck out of you. Then again, it isn't really surprising at all.
You miss the part where I was right?
I think that it is very self-evident that you are far, far right.
Frogfish is the CCP apologist you fucking moron.
I got the Pfizer vaccine, I waited until they figured out the Moderna and Astrazeneca vaccines had a greater risk of clots for people my age. And got it.
The only reason I got it was because Europe is introducing a vaccine passport. Without a vaccine I wouldn't have been able to go on holiday. It wasn't a free choice to get the vaccine.
I would have preferred had the vaccines been properly tested before being forced upon people.
And no we shouldn't ban Christmas tree lights, they actually have a positive impact on people.
Its no real surprise that vaccine related deaths are massively up this year if the likes of you can get employed by the companies making them
Wow - I guess I touched a nerve.
What data points to the Moderna vaccine being responsible for clots in people your age? Please make something up to try not to look like a cold-busted bellend again. On the other hand, you could click through to this data source - which is often cited by Dantes - to see what a massive fucking twat you are: https://www.the-scientist.com/news-...vid-19-higher-than-after-vaccines-study-68675
Surely getting vaccinated for your holidays in Europe is still a choice? What with the incredible risk of being vaccinated, why take the risk? I sure there are plenty of places in the UK you could go. Weston-Super-Mare is lovely this time of year.
You didn't answer my question about how many lives the vaccine has saved? Because that would make you look even more stupid than you currently do. Which is barely believable.
Vaccine-related deaths are "massively" up this year. Please quantify "massively" in comparison to the death toll of COVID. And then let us know how "massively" down the death toll of COVID is in vaccinated people.
Do yo win many of your legal cases? If in fact you practice law? Because you get your fat ass handed you you every day on this forum.
You cannot possibly believe that - very, very slight risk that there is, granted - the vaccines don't have a positive impact on the vast, vast majority of people, and therefore society as a whole, surely..?
What new evidence do you await? Other than the plummeting infection and fatality rates around the world, as more and more get vaccinated..? Genuine question.
And for how long will you wait? If you wait long enough, and are determined that it doesn't work, you'll eventually be proven right... We're all gonna die someday anyway.
His holiday passport was more important than the evidence of the horrific risk that the vaccines present.
How do you know it was the vaccine ?
You mean other than the fact it was the only new factor introduced into the equation since the entire thing began..?
That's unscientific reasoning.
And there was a change in the testing for Covid too, to reduce the amount of false positives. A problem which was known at the outset of the testing programme.
This is my issue. They moved the goal posts. And the 28 days within a positive test that I keep banging on about.
However, the primary reason for my reluctance is every time I see that slippery lizard Matt Hancock grinning about the vaccine roll out, and Boris Johnson bumbling on about how great a job they're doing, my bullshit alarm goes off.
It's probably a boy who cried wolf situation. But anything they champion, I'm automatically going to assume they're up to something, and to our detriment.
But then again, I back that up with absolutely no research or in depth critical thinking. I'm actively staying in the dark about it all, because, well, be arsed.
Nah Hancock should be hung drawn and quartered the fucking gimp.
Similar threads
