• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

A third way would be in the case of violent crime rates following the legal implications of BLM on cops, which your legal experts celebrated and whom you cited in support of the notion that my argument was racist trump dick sucking delusion. How'd that work out? The cops doing exactly what I told you they would?

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/opini...ica-after-police-retreated-column/7137565002/

That wasn't even a hard prediction to make. It doesn't involve any physics or maths, it just requires thought. Except you've outsourced your thoughts to fake experts. That's your problem. If I were you, I'd want to solve it, but perhaps you really do only care about your feels feeling good than you do about making accurate predictions about people's future well being and finances.
 
Median household income is up under Trump. That's as far as I think you're able to go. If you really want to unpack that, go and get the data and do research upon it, or go and look for a research paper where someone else did it for you. If you have questions about how to do or interpret that research, then ask away.

Was it up under Obama?

Is it up under Biden?
 
Actually why stop there.

Was it up und Bush 2, Clinton, Bush 1, Regan, Carter....?
 
Actually why stop there.

Was it up und Bush 2, Clinton, Bush 1, Regan, Carter....?

Did you not look at the graph? Do you want me to point out where the line goes up and where it goes down for you? It seems so. A line that is like / is going up, a line that is like \ is going down. /......up. \...... down.

/ this type of line is up
\ this type of line is far away



fredgraph.png
 
Biden will have passed away by the time his data is available, if I showed it to you I think I'd be met with abuse for speaking ill of the dead.
 
Did you not look at the graph? Do you want me to point out where the line goes up and where it goes down for you? It seems so. A line that is like / is going up, a line that is like \ is going down. /......up. \...... down.

/ this type of line is up
\ this type of line is far away



fredgraph.png


Yeah - so it went up Under Reagan, down Under Bush 1, up under Clinton, down Under Bush 2, and under Obama it ended up higher at the end of his 2 terms than at the start.

So, I presume you’ll be championing Bill Clinton for presiding over the largest increase during his terms.

Interestingly, the increase seems like it could be plotted in a straight line on the trend from 2014.

So are you saying Trump was hanging on the coattails of Obama’s good work.... again!

Credit to Trump - he’s the first Republican President since Regan to take over and not oversee some sort of financial meltdown.

Well... those figures look like they’re to 2019 - I’d imagine 2020’s figure might change that graph a little - seems like the Republicans always end up leaving the Democrats to sort out a mess.
 
Mark Meadows seems to be smoking the same stuff as Dantes and Rosco.
Tin foil hats and satelites.
 
Yeah - so it went up Under Reagan, down Under Bush 1, up under Clinton, down Under Bush 2, and under Obama it ended up higher at the end of his 2 terms than at the start.

So, I presume you’ll be championing Bill Clinton for presiding over the largest increase during his terms.

Interestingly, the increase seems like it could be plotted in a straight line on the trend from 2014.

So are you saying Trump was hanging on the coattails of Obama’s good work.... again!

Credit to Trump - he’s the first Republican President since Regan to take over and not oversee some sort of financial meltdown.

Well... those figures look like they’re to 2019 - I’d imagine 2020’s figure might change that graph a little - seems like the Republicans always end up leaving the Democrats to sort out a mess.

Has your supposed interest in researching the drivers of income growth ended once you were able to reconcile it with your feels? Got it.
 
Has your supposed interest in researching the drivers of income growth ended once you were able to reconcile it with your feels? Got it.

I don’t have any feels about the US Median Household - Given that I’m not part of a household in the US.
 
I don’t have any feels about the US Median Household - Given that I’m not part of a household in the US.

[article]
Today the House of Representatives has taken an historic step toward continued prosperity in America, reform in China, and peace in the world. . . it will open new doors of trade for America and new hope for change in China. - Bill Clinton, U.S. President, Circa 2000.
[/article]

Well, I'll leave that there and if you give a shit you can use it to continue your research on the drivers of median household income in the states and/or genocide in the peoples republic of china on your own.
 
Yes, another way would be in the case of the blood clots. How'd your expert statisticians work out for you there?
Err pretty damn good actually. Far better than your brain seems to comprehend.

Norway/Denmark study :
Their findings are based on 280,000 people aged 18-65 who received a first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca covid-19 vaccine in Denmark and Norway from February 2021 through to 11 March 2021.
Using national health records, they identified rates of events, such as heart attacks, strokes, deep vein blood clots and bleeding events within 28 days of receiving a first vaccine dose and compared these with expected rates in the general populations of Denmark and Norway.
In the main analysis, the researchers found 59 blood clots in the veins compared with 30 expected, corresponding to 11 excess events per 100,000 vaccinations. This included a higher than expected rate of blood clots in the veins of the brain, known as cerebral venous thrombosis (2.5 events per 100,000 vaccinations).


BHF
... up to 26 May over 24.3 million people have now had this vaccine in the UK. There were 348 reports of people developing rare blood clots which were linked to low platelet levels after receiving a first dose of the Oxford/ AstraZeneca vaccine in the UK. [hl]These 348 cases of blood clots are after over 37.7 million total doses of the vaccine. Of the 348 people who developed blood clots, 61 died. That's 0.0000000016% of those inoculated.[/hl]
In the main analysis, the researchers found 59 blood clots in the veins compared with 30 expected, corresponding to 11 excess events per 100,000 vaccinations. This included a higher than expected rate of blood clots in the veins of the brain, known as cerebral venous thrombosis (2.5 events per 100,000 vaccinations). However, they found no increase in the rate of arterial clots, such as heart attacks or strokes.
 
You just going to pretend you never believed the vaccines were not the cause of the clots? Got it.
 
@dantes perhaps consider taking a week-long break from this thread, the covid thread, and anything related to Trump or Covid.

Spend some time in The Lying Rag. Post more in the footie forum. Start some interesting threads on science or mathematics and remind us all of the days when it wasn't so difficult to pretend you were smart.
 
[article]
Today the House of Representatives has taken an historic step toward continued prosperity in America, reform in China, and peace in the world. . . it will open new doors of trade for America and new hope for change in China. - Bill Clinton, U.S. President, Circa 2000.
[/article]

Well, I'll leave that there and if you give a shit you can use it to continue your research on the drivers of median household income in the states and/or genocide in the peoples republic of china on your own.


Sounds like you’ve got a touch of the “feels” - trying to get China in there again I see - is that your go to now?

Also - what did Trump do about all this while he was in office - I know he waited till pretty much the last few days before the genocide classification - I mean, there’s a probably a reason if you believe what John Bolton suggests - not that I necessarily believe anything that comes out of Bolton’s mouth - but didn’t Trump reportedly say China was “doing the right thing”?

Bit unfortunate, if true.
 
I can only assume dantes would be all over this and crying about dementia if it was sleepy joe. He's just ignoring this, though, right?

No no!!!! That’s the correct way to wear trousers - every one else other than Trump has been wearing them wrong.... fake news... blah blah... no ethidence... *graph*.... China bad!!!..... feels.... blah blah.... fraud... China again... love to see it..

Is it coz Trump’s wearing his man nappy again?
 
I can only assume dantes would be all over this and crying about dementia if it was sleepy joe. He's just ignoring this, though, right?
I think he's on the wind up. It's the only explanation why he ignores trump's failings and highlights biden's.
 
I think he's on the wind up. It's the only explanation why he ignores trump's failings and highlights biden's.

Seriously? You've spent a year or more insulting my intelligence. Hahah dantes is stupid for believing in the hunter biden laptop is real. Haha dantes is stupid for believing trump is a good president. Haha dantes in a cult. Haha dantes believes in conspiracy theories about blood clots. Haha dantes get help, the wuhan lab leak is right wing propaganda. Haha dantes believes there was election fraud.

You seem to believe I was taken for a fool, insulting my intelligence. Now as we see you were wrong about these things, I would have expected some humility. Instead you continue to insult my intelligence for, reasons, denial, whataboutism, not sure how your brain is working. So it is logical, I'm going to give you a scathing assessment of your intelligence. It is what it is.
 
It's a good job Trump is going to be President in August again or I think Dantes might not be let out of ashworth.
 
It's a good job Trump is going to be President in August again or I think Dantes might not be let out of ashworth.

What was it you said to me? "Imagine believing a blind computer store owner took Biden's laptop and handed it to the FBI". Think that's about right. Guess what, you were wrong. At least your jokes are still funny.
 
Leave Dantes alone.. its been a very traumatic day to learn your hero wears Tena for men

You still don't get it. When I look at the photo, the obvious conclusion is he put his trousers on backwards, perhaps to cover a stain on the other side, and appears to have a nappy on underneath. I don't make retarded wrong conclusions. Because I'm not a woke fool like most you have become. Yet you look at Biden calling a six year old girl nineteen because of her crossed legs, and conclude it's meaningless, nah just harmless grandfatherly banter. Then cope with it by pretending I am equally as thick in regards to Trump. But that's just not true now matter how much your feels tell you otherwise.
 
You still don't get it. When I look at the photo, the obvious conclusion is he put his trousers on backwards, perhaps to cover a stain on the other side, and appears to have a nappy on underneath. I don't make retarded wrong conclusions. Because I'm not a woke fool like most you have become. Yet you look at Biden calling a six year old girl nineteen because of her crossed legs, and conclude it's meaningless, nah just harmless grandfatherly banter. Then cope with it by pretending I am equally as thick in regards to Trump. But that's just not true now matter how much your feels tell you otherwise.
I never once commented on that Biden story.
 
Back
Top Bottom