Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
If you look at the chart since their ipo, they were about this price back then, shot up on dumb hype to 74, then like most ipo's the investors realised these fucking chancers don't know how to make money, the price collapsed down to 15 and stabilised there for a year and a bit. That was until the end of 2016 when the GOAT POTUS brought legions of followers to them, and their price went back towards it's ipo days. Well those days are gone now, if I were you I wouldn't consider buying them until they're back around 15.
That might mean nothing as the investors are not blind to the fact the CEO is a woke nutcase. I'd be pretty nervous if I was holding their stock at this moment.
He's not that woke dude. He banned me for a start. And he charges 3.25% per transaction in Africa. Effectively rinsing the entire continent of billions every year because they haven't got a decent payment infrastructure. If you listen to him in interviews he talks about how he's enabled African business. It's more like protection
He personally banned you?
Twitter share performance is impacted by Trump but saying purely down to one mad man is a bit simplistic.
Compare to other Share's for the last week impacted by the ban for e.g.
If you are reliant on Trump for business then it's probably not a good sustainable business model anyway.
Compare to other Share's for the last week impacted by the ban for e.g.
- GOOG - Owners of Youtube - Down ~2%
- AMAZ - Owners of Twitch - UP ~0.1%
- SHOPIFY - UP ~6%
- SNAPCHAT - DOWN - UP ~1.5%
If you are reliant on Trump for business then it's probably not a good sustainable business model anyway.
Last edited:
You need the right there, you want the right there on that wall for you to call out. Without them, the conversation stops. It's not just Trump's following, it's the silencing of the debate and engagements. Everyone will be tweeting about the weather and eastenders this time next year, so you won't be missing much.
The banning is probably bad in the medium to long-term for big tech because it almost increased regulation. Republicans and Trump supporters in particular are going go at this like a dog with a bone - anything to shift the narrative.
On the other hand, it'll be interesting to see what happens with his base without the same level of direct interaction they're used to.
On the other hand, it'll be interesting to see what happens with his base without the same level of direct interaction they're used to.
Yeah, I've never debated his intentions. But when we start arresting people based on what we interpret and infer that they said, then it could lead to a slippery slope for the rest of us should even more conniving, sinister cunts get in charge. Trump deserves to burn, but surely there's something more concrete they can get him on.
46 now. You love to see it.
There's definitely some hypocrisy, but you just have to look at and compare the motives and ideologies behind the BLM supporters and the Trump nuts to see why there might be a different narrative about the two events.
What are the motives and ideologies of BLM ?
You'll find the narrative had hidden them as much as possible
You do understand there's a difference between BLM the movement and BLM the message?
Many black folk I know don't wholly agree with the movement (which was started by 3 LGBT women who wanted to pushed that agenda more so than a black one) but we all do deeply care about the message that Black lives matter (too). Unfortunately, those 2 things (movement/message) seem to be conflated (intentionally or unintentionally).
That's my point. Everyone knows the broad message, very few know the organisations ideology and aims.
Of all the dantes was right shockers, you can take it to the bank that black people will be much worse off under biden (who's own statements prove him to be a bonafide racist, but that's besides the point).
Twitter @45.50 now looooooooooooooll hahahahaa the price chart today is one of the most hilarious things I've ever seen in my life. It's just a linear downslope. A stright line down. Hahahaha fuck me that's a complete and utter bitch slap. Usually when a stock is falling, it drops, rests, bounces, drops again, bounces. Not twitter, that summabitch is just a relentless slide tick after tick hahahahahaha you love to see it.
Most (non racist) people agree with the broad message.
The organisation and aims most (black) people probably wouldn't agree with (certainly not with all of it), as it's more a Pro-LGBT agenda, more so than a Pro-black one. That's been used as a bit of a guise.
Similar threads
