I'm quite looking forward to Lyon coming in to bat. I rather fancy Cook to throw the ball to Stokes, and we'll soon see if the wee twerp has quite so much to say for himself with the ball flying up by his throat.
Ha! Me too. Shame for them to fall from grace so predictably......So will Watson and Haddin be playing in the next game? I have to say, I really hope so.
Ha! Me too. Shame for them to fall from grace so predictably......
I know - On commentary today I heard Haddin has averaged 15 with the bat in his last 10 tests. I know he has/had talent but he is 37. I respect the player he was but hope the player he is plays at Lords....
Ryan said he was great in the WC, but there is a massive difference in concentrating behind the wickets for two innings of 100 or so overs within a few days, and a 50 over one-dayer.
Yep that was pointed out yesterday as well. Problems problems for the Aussies...... He he he 😀
If Stark is injured who would you prefer? Siddle or Cummings. I don't know anything about the later..
Watson will get the shepherd's hook for Marsh.
Cummings hasn't played since the 2nd of May at the ipl, to come in at Lords with its idiosyncratic slope without any experience or overs other than in the nets would be really difficult for him. I don't think he played in the warm ups so I would have thought they would bring in Siddle, who did playPrefer Siddle every day of the week. Lost heaps of pace and will be ineffective if we serve up a similar pitch. Cummings is quality.
If Starc does go out, it'll be Siddle. Cummins is the better bowler and is a terrific long-term prospect (he took a Michelle in his first Test in South Africa a few years back) but he's had a badly interrupted 2-3 years with injury, and is too raw.
Besides, Siddle can be relied upon for a decent run-rate and some steady line and length which the Aussies need more of after giving away runs through the wayward left-handers in the opening test.
All that said, Starc will play even if he’s only 50% fit. He’s their best bowler, he’s a wicket-taker, and word is that his injury isn’t as bad as first thought.
Ryan, as an ex footballer you would know a bit more about this from an injury point of view, but Stark had pain killing injections ( cortisone ) in his ankle in order to bowl, doesn't this just mask the problem and risk the chances of him escalating the problem into something more long term?
I had a cortisone injection in my achilles a few years back and the dr said he couldn't give another for 6 months
I did a bit of reading around the Starc / Cummings / Siddle thing. It's a proper dilemma for the Aussies. Starc is definitely the most competent (and was very impressive in Cardiff - despite his injury) He is nursing an injury though so in a different set up someone else would come in and he would be rested for Lords. The alternatives - Siddle (steady but lacking in pace) or Cummings (a great prospect but wildly lacking in control) Either way whatever choice they make would be very telling.
I predict Starc will be wheeled out. The guy is a trooper and a wicket taker. They are a test down so they really don't want to be fucking about.
Yeah I agree, but in reality they held England to a good score in the first innings and bowled them out well in their second. Sure England made decent totals, but the Aussies took twenty wickets.
If they had have batted with any authority they'd have drawn the game without any fuss. So the bowling's not the issue really. Watson's fucking gone, everyone knows it, you can't dangle that fucking front pad out for 6 years running and not expect to get fucked out of the side. Marsh will come in, and I'd daresay this will be Chris Rodgers last shot too. If he doesn't perform at Lords he's gone.