• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Adam Lallana

Status
Not open for further replies.
The only thing worrying me with this deal is that no one else is interested. Where are Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham, City etc?
We're getting Downing'ed again.


In fairness Utd have been linked with him and you could probably make a good case for why the rest might not be looking at him at the moment.
 
In fairness Utd have been linked with him and you could probably make a good case for why the rest might not be looking at him at the moment.
Was that really credible?
I mean as credible as the Shaw link?
 
Suarez was wanted Spurs. Coutinho by Southampton. Studge was a reject from a top team. Lallana is an English player who now has two Pl seasons under his belt and made the team of the year and the national team.
Shaw is wanted by Man U and Chelsea. Why isn't Lallana that sought after?
I think we see something in him that no one else does and we think we're slick by paying over the odds for him.

Suarez wasn't wanted by Spurs, Redknapp openly admitted (as he does) in an interview saying they looked at him and didn't think he would be up to scratch for English football (lol!).

Chelsea haven't declared any interest in Shaw either, just Man Utd, if reports are to be believed then they are not interested at that price and prefer the Atletico Left back.

We see what everyone sees and that is that hes a class player, other clubs have other needs and whos to say thay are not interested anyway.
 
The only thing worrying me with this deal is that no one else is interested. Where are Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham, City etc?
We're getting Downing'ed again.

Or maybe just maybe the teams you've mentioned don't have a need for the type of player Lallana is.
 
Was that really credible?
I mean as credible as the Shaw link?


I have no idea. I don't think it was as rock solid as the Shaw link, but they may have been interested in Lallana at some point too. Seems somewhat unlikely given that they already have Mata and Kagawa but who knows.
 
Suarez was wanted Spurs. Coutinho by Southampton. Studge was a reject from a top team. Lallana is an English player who now has two Pl seasons under his belt and made the team of the year and the national team.
Shaw is wanted by Man U and Chelsea. Why isn't Lallana that sought after?
I think we see something in him that no one else does and we think we're slick by paying over the odds for him.

Spurs didn't want Suarez as they thought he was too expensive and similar to VDV so never put in a bid. You mentioned top teams and now you're saying southampton wanted coutinho...which one is it? When i said no want wanted him i was going by you asking how come top teams don't want lallana. Southampton isn't in that bracket so no top team wanted coutinho. Studge was a reject from a top team...i'll give you that one.

Why isn't lallana wanted by the other teams? Look at the midfield of chelsea, arsenal and city and tell me where he would fit? Rumour is that lallana already rejected manure's advances and has set that he only wants to come to us. Getting top quality fullbacks is a lot harder to find these days than attacking midfielders, hence the demand for Shaw...... all IMO of course.
 
Exactly. Lallana is in the same bracket as Allan. £15 million imo and that's including the English premium.
We need to fucking know our limit and be ready back out of a deal if it exceeds that limit.
Let him fucking stay at Southampton.
Offer Inter half that for that young midfielder and they'd bite our hand off.

Lallana is a lot better than allen. But then again you rate allen a lot higher than i do.
 
Well I don't think Coutinho is going to add 20 goals a season to this game.

Since when did he play as a striker? If he scores 10 and assists 10-15 then it will be a very good return, and if he steps up his game and improves his finishing then that's easily achievable
 
There's always room for improvement, right?
Isn't Lallana better than Kagawa or Eriksen etc

Eriksen is Spurs best player, why would replacing him be any sort of priority?

Man Utd have Kagawa and Mata, again they have much bigger priorities elsewhere to sort out in their team.
 
I'm very very wary of spending anything like 25M on Lallana but not that worried about not having to duke it out with a host of clubs to get a player (not in the least because we often lose in those scenarios).

We didn't have to get into a dogfight with the creme de la creme of Europe to get Torres. Of course Lallana doesn't quite have the pedigree Torres had at the time but the example still works.
 
Didn't both of them only have 1 year left on their contract though? that always reduces the fee Lallana has 3 years left.
 
1) Everyone is gonna cost at least 50% more this summer than last coz of extra TV dosh

2) Erikson and Kagawa weren't proven in the prem. You pay extra for that.
 
1) Everyone is gonna cost at least 50% more this summer than last coz of extra TV dosh

2) Erikson and Kagawa weren't proven in the prem. You pay extra for that.

1. Is a fair point.

2. The suggestion is that we should pay extra for prem proven. Premiership proven doesn't mean you're any more likely to be a success, so it's pointless to pay extra for it.
 
Didn't both of them only have 1 year left on their contract though? that always reduces the fee Lallana has 3 years left.


I'm not sure, but you're probably right. Why not find someone with a year left then? It's not as if there's a lack of players that play his position, surely someone has to be cheaper, which will allow us to buy all the other players we need.
 
2) Downing, Carroll

You parade that around a lot, Modo. Lets get this out of the repertoire.
Downing was Premiership proven shit. A lot of people on here said it at the time.
Carroll was not Premiership proven. He had one good half season and we took a gamble based on the potential.
Thankfully the same people aren't making the decisions as we'd have no chance.

A thing all of you seem to forget in assessing players is their attitude. Which BR has spoken to. If Lallana has the right attitude for LFC according to BR I'm all aboard paying the premium. We walked away from Erikson at 12m because of the attitude. I'm willing to give this new setup time and support to make their decisions. They've earned it.
 
I'm very very wary of spending anything like 25M on Lallana but not that worried about not having to duke it out with a host of clubs to get a player (not in the least because we often lose in those scenarios).

We didn't have to get into a dogfight with the creme de la creme of Europe to get Torres. Of course Lallana doesn't quite have the pedigree Torres had at the time but the example still works.


Torres was a strange one as he was in a bit of a rut. Utd tried to sign him the year before but he refused to leave, and then he had a quiet year which put a lot of teams off bidding on him.

There was also a lot of uproar on here with a lot of people claiming he wasn't good enough
 
Lallana is an ok player, Allen is an ok player neither of them will win us matches in the way Suarez, studge, sterling or Coutinho will.

Would arse, Chelsea or City want him - no because they have better.

Is Lallana better the. Suarez, Sturridge, sterling or Coutinho and IMO the answer is no - so don't buy him as Rodgers states he wants to improve the starting 11 and he isn't better than those I have mentioned so don't do it for the excessive price we are quoted.
 
Here's an idea, why not buy a player who is deemed to be better than Chelsea, Arsenal, City and Man U's options?
Or as good?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom