[quote author=Brendan link=topic=40111.msg1103302#msg1103302 date=1273595235]
The Government has a bad record on large IT projects, doesn't it? I have heard it suggested that the people making the decisions often don't understand how ambitious the projects actually are.
That would be the doomed NHS IT project that doubled in cost to £12
billion
Funny that.
Large IT projects in the private sector get done, on time, on budget, quite often.
I suppose that's because nobody outside of the private sector has any fucking concept of cost, scope, viability, culpability, responsibility, the threat of being fired, or actually doing any work.
[/quote]
I have worked on mainly public sector IT projects for the last few years for all sorts of service providers and they are always the same. scope keeps changing, the public sector bosses take too long to make a decision or to implement anything on their side hence massive delays and budget overspends.
This happened on Afganistan, Iraq, E-borders, DIIF, NHS, ID cards, every and DWP project I can think of ETC ETC ETC
It is funny for a tory fan I am doing myself out of work as they will cut the IT projects and claim will use smaller firms rather than giving the projects to the same old big service companies who I have contracted for and keep messing them up (Dell, Fujitsu, HP, EDS, Logica, BT, EADS)
It always amazes me how much Labour have spent on IT projects. BSF (building schools for the future) is now the latest biggest waste of money.
I am glad I am off that one