Just managed to get a bet on Sweden 1-0 after that foul & before it went to the VAR. 4/1.
World Cup Day 5.
- Thread starter Oncy
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Good little betting advantage that.
They lock the odds when the incident happens. Then open it & relock it once it gets referred. So if you think it'll get referred you have a couple of seconds to get the bet in.
They lock the odds when the incident happens. Then open it & relock it once it gets referred. So if you think it'll get referred you have a couple of seconds to get the bet in.
A glitch in the matrix. Respect
Overall, I think I like VAR.
Only real mistake that's been able to live on, was Switzerland's goal yesterday. That's massive improvements compared to normal procedure.
And even then, I don't think that was a clear foul. It was weak by Miranda. We'd crucify lovren for less
Yeah. Hit the 1-0 button which got it into the betslip but it then immediately locked & wouldn't let me place.
Then play went on & it unlocked so could confirm.
Then it locked again a split second later.
Means you have to have the app or site open & ready whilst you watch.
Although I suspect if it keeps happening they'll keep the odds locked for a bit longer to negate it.
Yeah it wasn't the most blatant of penalties I agree, I still think most refs would've called it as he so clearly had two hands on his back. It kinda also adds some excitement that some refs seems less inclined to second guess their own decision.
If you know who's defo gonna take pens (Portugal Ronaldo for example) you could do first goalscorer using that too actually.
VAR is definitely working much better in the WC than the version in the cup games they've done here that's for sure.
Update. Back in the office and using the WiFi to stream the second half.
There was a stone wall penalty for Argentina against Iceland, about 10 mins from the end. The ref obviously didn't see it properly as he didn't give it - but surely that is where the VAR ref should intervene and pull it back.
What are the rules of when VAR gets involved - is it only at the invitation of the ref?
VAR is constantly monitored.
If the team monitoring think the refs decision was possibly wrong they invite to review it.
If they think it's definitely wrong they tell him he has to review it.
If Russia are playing none of that matters, obv.
I didn't catch that game, so wasn't aware.
Someone explained yesterday that the ref will get words of info in his ear from the VAR refs when there's a controversial decision to be made, and he then have to decide whether this new info moves him away from his initial decision.
I believe in the Brazil game the ref saw the incident and in combination with the VAR refs comments like "there was little contact" he decided to stick with his first hunch.
That is not a bad system actually but it can of course be flawed as well. But at least it still makes space for and honours the refs personal assessment of the situation, if he's feeling certain.
I enjoyed France v Australia
Not brilliant but decent.
"Handsssss, Handsssss, Haaandssss"
I thought Spain v Portugal was slightly entertaining too.. actually let me rephrase that, if that game didn't entertain you it's probably the wrong sport you are watching.. 🙂
PS The Peru v Denmark game was utterly nerve-wrecking too, and though the best team on the night didn't win, it was a boss game!! Also quite enjoyed Germany v MExico to be honest. And Iceland v Argentina sounded exciting at least.
Promising start, without being amazing-like.
I totally missed that.. my bad. And you are right. Those have been pretty dire mostly. Apart from the France game perhaps.
Ok, you and Oncy totally got this one covered, sorry for interfering. Forget everything I posted. Since 2010.
That was fucking boring, as expected, and it killed off my bet as well. Anyone have a good tip for the rest of the day?
San Miguel from the fridge
Should have seen that comming.
Really looking forward to this match.
- Status
Similar threads
