Agree. Especially if Clyne is on the mendTime to blood TAA in on that midfield role.
Agree. Especially if Clyne is on the mendTime to blood TAA in on that midfield role.
We're a Firmino or Salah injury away from 8th place.
Oh no it isn't.Thanks for respecting my opinion without resorting to abuse. What a contrary place this is.
Making a video of a ceremonial burning and posting it on YouTube is another alternative.The alternative is: wash the bladdy shirt!
Not like you to fall in to the hyperbole nonsense....
... but since you did.
Spurs are a Kane injury away from 8th.
Chelsea are a Morata or Hazard injury away from 8th.
Man Utd are a couple of injures away from Jesse Lingard being their attacking fulcrum.
Not like you to fall in to the hyperbole nonsense....
... but since you did.
Spurs are a Kane injury away from 8th.
Chelsea are a Morata or Hazard injury away from 8th.
Man Utd are a couple of injures away from Jesse Lingard being their attacking fulcrum.
I'm only reporting the story you English cunt!Dirty paddy bastard
Spurs did pretty well without Kane last time he got injured, didn't they?
We know this team though and it all it takes is one or two setbacks and we're in trouble.
It's fairly likely that there aren't really any great (value) signings we can make now because teams don't tend to sell their best players in January.
The whole thing is a mess.
Spurs did pretty well without Kane last time he got injured, didn't they?
We know this team though and it all it takes is one or two setbacks and we're in trouble.
It's fairly likely that there aren't really any great (value) signings we can make now because teams don't tend to sell their best players in January.
The whole thing is a mess.
I don't know that.
We've had a better record without Coutinho this season.
Look how Arsenal did this weekend without Sanchez.
Teams can lose their best players and improve. Might sound stupid, but it happens often.
We've rotated frequently this season, more than any team in the league and despite resting all our players, injuries and big players missing plenty of games due to various reasons we're still in the Top Four. We're on an unbeaten run for 17 or 18 games.
So I really don't agree with that post or the idea that we'll crumble with one or two injuries. History suggests, that's not true based on last season and this season when we've missed these players.
You would have thought it's a team game not an individual one!
Not like you to fall in to the hyperbole nonsense....
... but since you did.
Spurs are a Kane injury away from 8th.
Chelsea are a Morata or Hazard injury away from 8th.
Man Utd are a couple of injures away from Jesse Lingard being their attacking fulcrum.
Spurs did pretty well without Kane last time he got injured, didn't they?
We know this team though and it all it takes is one or two setbacks and we're in trouble.
It's fairly likely that there aren't really any great (value) signings we can make now because teams don't tend to sell their best players in January.
The whole thing is a mess.
Arsène Wenger has admitted the uncertainty surrounding Alexis Sánchez’s future at Arsenal affected his team’s morale in the first half of the season but insisted he has no regrets over his handling of the situation.
“Not the other players, just the team,” he said. “You work in a newspaper and there are periods when the atmosphere is less enjoyable than others. It is the lack of clarity. It is not losing players – teams are used to losing players. But it is fact that you have uncertainty in the group – that they don’t know if he will be here or not. Once it is clear, the team gets used to it.”
All three of those clubs have bought, or are buying attackers (Sanchez, Dzeko, and likely Malcolm) to lessen that risk this very month - so your argument's not great mate.
We're not in an unusual predicament. Look at this snippet about Spurs - there are more deals now for the summer than there are for now.
Tottenham want to sign another attacking player on loan and have been chasing three youngsters — Malcom, Ryan Sessegnon and Richarlison — none of whom is expected to be allowed to join this month. The north London club are likely to look to agree a deal for Sessegnon and allow him to stay at Fulham on loan while Malcom’s future is clouded by interest from Arsenal, who have said it would be difficult to sign him this month.
Whilst I agree, it's over a decade since we won a trophyOne loss and we've fucked up everything. Its the same logic as usual. Just buy someone is the usual crap. I'd rather continue to trust Klopp and that we get the right targets as we have been doing. Its working but taking time. One loss doesnt change that.
Whilst I agree, it's over a decade since we won a trophy
Whilst I agree, it's over a decade since we won a trophy
I'd really like us to spend money on an attacking midfielder.
I'd offer Arsenal 40m for Ozil. They may be tempted to cash in now.
He's the sort of player to unlock a team like Swansea. We're going to have a lot more games like tomorrow going forward now the whole league has seen us fail another bus parking operation.
There is no use in having the pace of Mane and Salah, when there's no space in behind to attack and we don't have a midfielder who can play a pass that releases them, nor find them in between the lines or in the half spaces.
The one time VVD showed his passing quality (and I was disappointed with how little risk he took yesterday), was the one time Salah was clean through on goal and decided to take the ball on the half volley.
Ozil picks those kind of passes all day.
We don't need him for the 25% of "big games" (where the likes of Gini/Can/Ox are needed for their pressing/running ability). We would need him for the other 75% percent of games against the "lower" teams, where you need his kind of quality and technique, over the aforementioned workrate.