So upset by this.Spending the Grealish money before City make it official.
Would love him in our midfield. He’s dynamite.
So upset by this.Spending the Grealish money before City make it official.
Did he reject them? I thought Villa were the only ones granted permission?It says a lot about Arsenals current standing when a player rejects them to go to Aston Villa.
They have spent massively over 2 seasons and finished 11th. Not that I really care, but if I was a fan, I would want the manager fired.
Did he reject them? I thought Villa were the only ones granted permission?
There is a lot of chatter around Bellingham. Would cost probably as much as Tielemans. But that's only going to increase
It would be impossible.If there's any chance to get him, we should make our move ...
Reported this morning that Villa rejected Arsenals bid.
Been reported a few places I think. Still, quite the signing from Villa.
If there's any chance to get him, we should make our move ...
Are either of them what we require? I don't see it. Neither are DMs and neither are goalscorers (Bell'. : 1 last season, Tielemans : 3 (4 assists), 3 (8) and 6 (9) over the past 3 seasons in the PL). Tielemans isn't someone who dominates the ball either so considering what we've got already he's not going to start (Fabs, Hendo and Thiago nailed on) or even really challenge them.Bellingham's a monster in the making (TBH he looks halfway there already) but if it's either/or I think I'd plump for Tielemans - already proven in the Prem and maybe a marginally less outrageous fee.
He may well do but where does he fit into our team right now? He's 17, he'd be another Jones, in and out the team to protect him but not getting 20 starts a season so not an asset with regard to pushing for the PL & CL next season.If he's genuinely going to live up to the hype, it's worth paying the extra to get him (Bellingham).
Are either of them what we require? I don't see it. Neither are DMs and neither are goalscorers (Bell'. : 1 last season, Tielemans : 3 (4 assists), 3 (8) and 6 (9) over the past 3 seasons in the PL). Tielemans isn't someone who dominates the ball either so considering what we've got already he's not going to start (Fabs, Hendo and Thiago nailed on) or even really challenge them.
For some reason you keep flogging this dead horse. Living in the Midlands I know a fair few Villa fans, and to a man and woman they'd say you're nuts. Being halfway up the Prem at this stage, securely so, doesn't strike them as a poor return for what they've spent, nor should it.
Not sure if Grealish fits City but happy for them to buy him. Likes a lot of the ball and holds on to it often far too long. Just don’t see it being Pep signing or improving City either way to the midfielders they already have. Would be far more concerned if City got Fernandinho replacement like Fabinho, Kante or Rice. Rordri has been good this season though.
£200m spent (over 2 seasons) , at one point villa were top 4. A better manager would have this team finishing top 6.This. I don't understand how anybody feels that halfway up the league for Aston Villa isn't a decent performance... Who above them should they have finished ahead of? I mean you could argue they might have expected to be ahead of Leeds, and at a stretch, maybe West Ham, but beyond that, who are they entitled to feel better than?
Arsenal in for Ruben Neves
Are either of them what we require? I don't see it. Neither are DMs and neither are goalscorers (Bell'. : 1 last season, Tielemans : 3 (4 assists), 3 (8) and 6 (9) over the past 3 seasons in the PL). Tielemans isn't someone who dominates the ball either so considering what we've got already he's not going to start (Fabs, Hendo and Thiago nailed on) or even really challenge them.
Would be quite a coup if he is allowed to do his job without interference.