• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Transfer Rumours 21/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
u_2_sala-juntas-copas-de-europa_av19529_20210714110514.jpg

REAL MADRID C. F. CLOSES THE 2020/21 FINANCIAL YEAR WITH A POSITIVE RESULT OF 874,000 EUROS

SEE GALLERY
SHARE
NEWS | 14/07/2021
THE LOSS OF REVENUE RESULTING FROM COVID-19 FROM MARCH 2020 AMOUNTS TO -€300 MILLION.

THE CLUB GOES FROM HAVING A NET DEBT OF €240 MILLION IN THE 2019/20 SEASON TO €46 MILLION IN THE 2020/21 SEASON (DEBT/EBITDA RATIO 0.3X).

THE CLUB HAS EQUITY AMOUNTING TO €534 MILLION AND CASH OF €122 MILLION AS OF 30 JUNE 2021.


[xtable=border:0]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td=colspan:3|55%x@}2020/21 ECONOMIC-FINANCIAL SUMMARY (excluding the stadium remodeling project){/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}MILLION €{/td}
{td=rowspan:1|15%x@}2019/20{/td}
{td=rowspan:1|15%x@}2020/21{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}Operating Income (before disposal of non-current assets){/td}
{td=15%x@}714,9{/td}
{td=15%x@}653,0{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}EBITDA{/td}
{td=15%x@}176,9{/td}
{td=15%x@}179,6{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}Profit after tax{/td}
{td=15%x@}0,3{/td}
{td=15%x@}0,9{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}Equity as of 30 June{/td}
{td=15%x@}532,9{/td}
{td=15%x@}533,7{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}Cash and cash equivalents as of 30 June{/td}
{td=15%x@}125,3{/td}
{td=15%x@}122,1{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4} {/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}Net debt as of 30 June{/td}
{td=15%x@}240,6{/td}
{td=15%x@}46,4{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}Net debt/EBITDA ratio{/td}
{td=15%x@}1,4x{/td}
{td=15%x@}0,3x{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}Net debt/Equity ratio{/td}
{td=15%x@}0,5x{/td}
{td=15%x@}0,1x{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]


The Board of Directors of Real Madrid C. F., gathered today 14 July, has approved the annual accounts for the 2020-2021 financial year.

The effects of the healthcare crisis caused by Covid-19, which started in March last year, have continued throughout the 2020/21 financial year, with all matches having to be played behind closed doors. This has led to a loss of revenue in all lines of business, primarily for the stadium, as there is no income from match attendances, but also for TV rights, both from LaLiga and UEFA, and commercial activities, both in the operation of facilities and in retail sales and sponsorship.



As compared to the situation prior to the pandemic, the loss of income that the Club has incurred in its different lines of business from March 2020 to 30 June 2021 is approximately €300 million, to which should be added the loss of new revenue that could have been obtained in the absence of the pandemic.

This loss of income has only been compensated by the Club through the application of intense cost-saving measures in all areas:


[xtable=border:0]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4|85%x@}SAVINGS MEASURES UNDERTAKEN BY THE CLUB
Impact on profit before tax (millions €){/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=40%x@} {/td}
{td=rowspan:1|20%x@}2019/20{/td}
{td=rowspan:1|20%x@}2020/21{/td}
{td=rowspan:1|20%x@}Aggregate 20+21{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=40%x@}Salary reduction{/td}
{td=20%x@}36{/td}
{td=20%x@}22{/td}
{td=20%x@}58{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=40%x@}Operational cost savings{/td}
{td=20%x@}24{/td}
{td=20%x@}38{/td}
{td=20%x@}62{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=40%x@}Player transfers *{/td}
{td=20%x@} {/td}
{td=20%x@}175{/td}
{td=20%x@}175{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=40%x@}Total{/td}
{td=20%x@}60{/td}
{td=20%x@}235{/td}
{td=20%x@}295{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4|85%x@}*Overall impact including transfers, income from loan deals, savings on staff costs and amortization{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]

-Player cost savings plan: in 2020/21 there were no acquisitions and player terminations have taken place, with a consequent impact on both transfer capital gains and cost savings.

-Reduction in salary costs: in both 2019/20 and 2020/21, members of the first squads in both football and basketball and leading executives in the various directorates have agreed to voluntarily reduce their annual remuneration by 10%.

-Operational cost savings plan: In addition to the reduction in spending due to lower costs associated with the loss of income, the Club has also implemented, over the fifteen months of the pandemic, a cost savings plan for the various activities and services contracted, which has resulted in an additional reduction in spending equivalent to almost 25% of the total annual expenditure previous to the pandemic.




In both 2019/20 (€177 million) and 2020/21 (€180 million), the Club reported higher EBITDA than in 2018/19 (€176 million) before the pandemic, notwithstanding the near €300 million revenue loss incurred in both years due to the Covid-19 impact. This is a testament to the Club's operational efficiency, and its ability to respond by adopting cost-saving measures to mitigate these losses.

As a result of the cost-saving measures taken to compensate for the loss of income due to the pandemic, the Club will close the 2020/21 financial year with a profit of €874,000 after tax, in the same way as it closed the 2019/20 financial year with a profit of €313,000. This makes the Club one of the few major clubs in Europe that will not have incurred losses in these two financial years, given that, according to a UEFA study, the accumulated operating losses of European clubs between 2019/20 and 2020/21 will be close to €6 billion.

The Club would like to commend the contribution made by sporting and non-sporting staff in implementing the cost-saving and improvement measures that have made it possible to achieve these results.


As the Club has made a profit in both 2019/20 and 2020/21, despite the effects of the pandemic, the Club has managed to marginally increase the value of Equity compared to the situation as of June 2019 before the pandemic, resulting in a Equity value of €534 million as of 30 June 2021.

In order to offset the financial impact of the loss of income caused by Covid-19, in April 2020 the Club secured new bank financing in the amount of €205 million, of which €155 million correspond to four loans with a 1-year grace period and a 5-year maturity and €50 million to a credit facility with a 3-year maturity. The operations were independently formalised with the five national banks with which the Club operates and 70% of the amount is covered by the Official Credit Institute (ICO), as part of the government approved line of credit to facilitate the liquidity of companies. During the 2020/21 financial year, and in accordance with RDL 34/2020 of 17 November, the Club has prolonged the grace period and maturity of the loans by 1 year.



The Club closes the 2020/21 financial year with a cash balance, as at 30 June 2021, of €122 million, excluding the stadium redemodeling project.

This balance has been achieved after repaying a €50m bank loan during the 2020/21 financial year and without the need to have a credit facility balance.

The loss of income resulting from Covid-19, with the consequent impact on cash flow, has been compensated by the Club through the savings measures and the formalisation of the above mentioned €155 million long-term bank loans in April 2020.

As of 30 June 2021, the Club has unused credit facilities amounting to €361 million, which, together with its cash balance, enables it to comfortably meet its expected payment commitments.



The Net Debt as of 30 June 2021, excluding the stadium redemodeling project, amounts to €46 million, compared to €241 million the previous year, which means that, during the 2020/21 financial year, the Club reduced its net debt by €195 million.

In comparison to the pre-pandemic situation (30 June 2019: net cash position of €27 million), the net debt as of 30 June 2021 is €73 million higher. This shows that the Club has managed to compensate, through the implemented savings measures, the majority of the near €300 million loss of income resulting from the pandemic and its consequent impact on lower cash flow and consequently higher net debt.

The Debt/EBITDA ratio stands at 0.3.All these figures demonstrate the solid financial situation and high level of solvency that the Club maintains despite the pandemic.


[xtable=border:0]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td=colspan:3|100%x@}FISCAL BALANCE: REAL MADRID'S CONTRIBUTION TO TAX INCOME AND SOCIAL SECURITY REVENUES{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}AMOUNTS PAID IN THE 2020/2021 FINANCIAL YEAR{/td}
{td=rowspan:1|15%x@}€ THOUSANDS{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:3}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}Personnel income tax withholding and non-resident income tax (deductions from staff remuneration and image rights){/td}
{td=15%x@}178.930{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}INCOME TAX{/td}
{td=15%x@}-12.885{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}Property and other local taxes{/td}
{td=15%x@}5.126{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUTIONS (company){/td}
{td=15%x@}8.564{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUTIONS (employee){/td}
{td=15%x@}1.862{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:3}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}TOTAL COST OF TAXES AND SOCIAL SECURITY{/td}
{td=15%x@}181.598{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}% of revenue{/td}
{td=15%x@}28%{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:3}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}NET VAT PAID{/td}
{td=15%x@}61.311{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:3}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=70%x@}TOTAL CONTRIBUTION BY REAL MADRID TO TAX REVENUE AND SOCIAL SECURITY{/td}
{td=15%x@}242.909{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:3}
{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]

Real Madrid's contribution towards Tax and Social Security revenues in the 2020/21 financial year amounted to €242.9 million.

In relation to the Santiago Bernabéu stadium remodelling project, in the 2020/21 financial year the building work has not been compatible with the hosting of matches at the Santiago Bernabéu stadium. This is because, as the attendance of the fans was not permitted due to the Covid-19 pandemic, after obtaining the relevant authorisations, the Club has been holding the first team football matches behind closed doors at the Alfredo Di Stéfano stadium.

The amount of the investment recorded in the 2020/21 financial year was €166 million, including the financial costs incurred during the construction period. This brings the cumulative investment up to 30 June 2021 to €279 million.
During this financial year, in July 2020, the second drawdown of the loan amounting to €275 million was made; bringing the total loan drawn down to €375 million by 30 June 2021 (the first drawdown of €100 million took place in July 2019).

2021/22 outlook

Regarding the upcoming financial year, stadium attendance is expected to return, although it is not yet known what percentage of the capacity will be allowed to be used over the course of the season.

Regarding the financial situation, current forecasts suggest that recovery to the pre-pandemic situation will not be immediate. Therefore, the Club will continue with the cost containment efforts it has made so far.


[xtable=border:0]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td=colspan:3|100%x@}STADIUM REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT: TOTAL 30-YEAR LOAN OF €575 MILLION.{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@} {/td}
{td=15%x@}2019/20{/td}
{td=15%x@}2020/21{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=colspan:4}
{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=55%x@}Cumulative investment{/td}
{td=15%x@}113,7{/td}
{td=15%x@}279,2{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
 
One of two things would make me really happy before the transfer window shuts.
  1. We buy a striker
  2. We buy a defensive midfielder
Fabinho can't play in every game and I'm sorry, but I don't trust anyone else in the squad to play there except him.
We don't need another DM..

Henderson can do a job there... As can Thiago

You are not going to get another DM who is happy to sit on the bench with the quality of Fabs..

Never going to happen
 
We don't need another DM..

Henderson can do a job there... As can Thiago

You are not going to get another DM who is happy to sit on the bench with the quality of Fabs..

Never going to happen
Yes we do, because the others suck in that position.
 
Levy has made Kane look like such a little bitch. Love to see it.

Bad news is City will go for Haaland next year and get him.
 
Yes we do, because the others suck in that position.

Totally agree on this, the others do completely suck over the course of 90 minutes.
@6TimesaRed - seriously - you think Thiago can do a job as a DM ? - you are having a laugh, and also Hendo ? - maybe for 1 or 2 games and that's it. We need players in that position that is their bread and butter - make it look effortless and are not likely to get injured after 1 or two games in that position. I actually thought that based on the highlights against Burnly we were very very brittle in that first half and the later part of the second half. We cannot let teams like that bully us into conceding space so easily in our own final third.
 
Levy has made Kane look like such a little bitch. Love to see it.

Bad news is City will go for Haaland next year and get him.

It is quite amazing that we as the 6 times European champions are not in any conversation to sign any of these top players. How fucking tight and poor are we ? - you have Arsenal spending millions and not being in the CL at the same time. Find it disturbing now, and don't even go there and start talking about contract renewals and net spend and how we bought so well in previous seasons. I worry we are a predictable side these days, with such a static workman like midfield.
 
Levy has made Kane look like such a little bitch. Love to see it.

Bad news is City will go for Haaland next year and get him.
Yeah, that's my fear as well.

Though report out of Germany today is that when Chelsea enquired about Haaland, Raiola demanded €50 million a year in wages plus €40 million in agent fees. Who can afford that?
 
Or he could be massive superstar like Gullit, Rijkard, Davids, Parick Snr etc.
Don’t think there is any real correlation to draw based on culture.
That was decades ago though.

It's only really been de Jong you would call a huge export success recently
 
For a player like Haaland there is surely no need for an agent - use your dad and you'll be able to divert more of the 'agent fees' (that i'm sure a player gets a cut of) back into your contract. I can't wait for the day that agent fees are removed from the game.
 
I hear that Everton are kind of concerned as PSG would want Richarlison - what I find is that it has taken this long for one of the outside big clubs to actually make a bid for what should never be .... that thing that should never be - is the fact that Brazils' main striker plays for fucking Everton LOL !!!!! How far the mighty have fallen. I mean can you image like 5- 10 years ago where the main striker for Brazil plays for Everton ? fuck me holy shit.

The current Barca and Madrid managers are ex Everton too. Lol.
 
Totally agree on this, the others do completely suck over the course of 90 minutes.
@6TimesaRed - seriously - you think Thiago can do a job as a DM ? - you are having a laugh, and also Hendo ? - maybe for 1 or 2 games and that's it. We need players in that position that is their bread and butter - make it look effortless and are not likely to get injured after 1 or two games in that position. I actually thought that based on the highlights against Burnly we were very very brittle in that first half and the later part of the second half. We cannot let teams like that bully us into conceding space so easily in our own final third.
Depends on the system..


We simply are not going to spend money on another DM. Its utter madness... Unless you can get a decent freebie somewhere, that won't command a high wage. Or get low profile signing and wait 12 months before he can be bed into our system.

If we want another DM we would have kept Gruijc.. But he wanted to leave for game time .

The side can be rejigged to cope with fabs loss..

As we have already have done and played two games without him.. and won them both

So that tells me we have a plan to manage his game time.

Do we really need fabs to play against the likes of Norwich, Burnley and Brighton etc. Nope.. We have the squad to cope,. If players stay fit..
 
Levy has made Kane look like such a little bitch. Love to see it.

Bad news is City will go for Haaland next year and get him.
They were always going to go for, and get, one of them. I'd rather it be next season. It gives us a shot this season and maybe next we'll be in for the 2-3 that we need to bolster our options / first team.
 
Depends on the system..


We simply are not going to spend money on another DM. Its utter madness... Unless you can get a decent freebie somewhere, that won't command a high wage. Or get low profile signing and wait 12 months before he can be bed into our system.

If we want another DM we would have kept Gruijc.. But he wanted to leave for game time .

The side can be rejigged to cope with fabs loss..

As we have already have done and played two games without him.. and won them both

So that tells me we have a plan to manage his game time.

Do we really need fabs to play against the likes of Norwich, Burnley and Brighton etc. Nope.. We have the squad to cope,. If players stay fit..

We can feel like that because we know he is available to us. Once Fab gets injured or is missing in action - just you watch how we suffer. Every game has those moments where we in the past had to play Hendo/Milner/Gini in midfield - basically letting the opposition dominate us in our final third.
 
Something tells me Leonardo will be looking for a new job.


PSG SD Leonardo on Kylian Mbappé: “If he wants to leave, we will not stop him, but on our terms.”

Speaking to RMC Sport, PSG Sporting Director Leonardo confirmed that the club had rejected Real Madrid’s opening bid for Kylian Mbappé and that the door is now open for the French international to exit.

How do you react to Real Madrid’s offer?

We have not had much public communication on all that, but our position has always been to keep Kylian, to extend his contract, that has always been our aim and that is still the case. We made two significant offers to Kylian: one at the level of the top players in our squad two months ago and one above that of those players very recently. We want to prove to him that he is an important player, at the centre of our project, but not above the project. In terms of our position on Real, it seems like a strategy to try to get a no from us, to show that they have tried everything and to wait for a year to get him for free. For the last 2 years, Real Madrid have been behaving like this, it is not correct, illegal even because they contacted the player. It is unacceptable for us, because it is not correct. It is proof of the strategy: an offer comes 1 year before the end of his contract and 7 days before the end of the window. They want us to reject to show to Kylian that they tried everything and to start negotiating for next year.

Have you rejected this offer?

Yes, we said no verbally. But we will not hold anyone back. If someone wants to leave and our conditions are met, we will see. But we have created a dream with our players this summer and we will not let anyone destroy it. We consider the offer to be very far from what Kylian represents today. We also owe part of this money to Monaco and we consider that the offer is not enough.

It was for €160m, yes?

I cannot confirm the numbers, but it is around that. It is less than what we paid for him. But it is above all the way in which Real Madrid have gone about it that we do not like.

Does Kylian Mbappé want to leave?

Kylian Mbappé wants to leave, that seems clear. If Real Madrid are making an offer, that seems clear… Me I am giving a position, that, I think, is clear for everyone. We cannot, the week before the end of the window, change our plans. If he wants to leave, we will not hold him back, but on our terms.

Have you spoken with Kylian Mbappé?

With Kylian, I have spoken a lot, he has always said the same things to us. Kylian has always promised that he would not leave the club for free. That is always what he has said to us.

So the door is open?

We have never opened the door to a departure. Never. People say that I want to sell and Nasser does not, but Nasser and I think the same thing. We are on the same wavelength. We defend the club. Our aim, is to extend his contract and keep him. But if a player wants to leave, that is on our terms, that goes not only for Kylian, but for all the players.

Do you expect to receive another offer?

We do not plan to speak with Real Madrid again. The deadline is 31st August at midnight. That is how the transfer window works, for us it is clear: we keep him and we extend him. But we are not going to allow someone to leave for a fee of less than we paid for him when we still owe Monaco money.

Do you have a Plan B?

We are not preparing anything on the market at the moment. He has another year on his contract, we want to extend him. We have never thought about a Plan B. We have created a very positive atmosphere. We are not going to let anyone change that.
 
I find the comment about owing part of the money to Monaco interesting. It sounds like they've agreed a sell-on fee that is either a percentage of the total fee received, or a percentage above a certain minimum amount (which is lower than what PSG paid to sign him).
This surprises me.
Usually (but not always) a sell-on would be drafted as a percentage of any fee received in excess of the original amount paid. This wasn't always the way in the past but clubs are wise to it now as this has been a sticking point in some deals in the past (think it was an issue when we signed Lallana from Southampton, for example). Bit of a schoolboy error by PSG.
He might be saying this to try to get Monaco to compromise - it would be in Monaco's interests for this deal to go through, even if they have to waive part of their sell-on to make it happen, because they'll get nothing next summer.
I did see a situation once where a club agreed to "buy-out" the sell-on fee due to the club they bought a player from to protect against this kind of situation. In that case, the original selling club needed the cash so were willing to do the deal.
 
Gravenberch could well be top class but it depends on his temperament. Dutch ballers in the cities can get easily swayed by culture and do a Babel (shit rapper) or a Promes (stab someone)

0_Premier-League-Liverpool-v-West-Ham-United.jpg


Wijnaldum, Van Persie, Robben, Sneidjer, Van Nistelrooy, Koeman, Van Der Saar, Bergkamp. We can keep on going. You are reading way too much from two footballers.
 
0_Premier-League-Liverpool-v-West-Ham-United.jpg


Van Persie, Robben, Sneidjer, Van Nistelrooy, Koeman, Van Der Saar, Bergkamp. We can keep on going. You are reading way too much from two footballers.
None of them are recent though. The most recent one on that list is van Dijk in 2013.

Anyway from what I experience here in Amsterdam there's a lot of footballers caught between different worlds. Much how I imagine it to be in London
 
It is quite amazing that we as the 6 times European champions are not in any conversation to sign any of these top players. How fucking tight and poor are we ? - you have Arsenal spending millions and not being in the CL at the same time. Find it disturbing now, and don't even go there and start talking about contract renewals and net spend and how we bought so well in previous seasons. I worry we are a predictable side these days, with such a static workman like midfield.
Stop being a whiny bitch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom