• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Toure update?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes. I didn't think there was anything wrong with the side Rodgers picked. Quite the contrary. The problem was the attitude they showed out on the pitch. For far too long, sides from lower divisions, drawn against us in cups, have rubbed their hands together and thought, 'They'll give us a chance,' because we've acquired a habit of resting far too many first choice players, fielding a team full of far too many unfamiliar partnerships,and the opposing team has started aggressively and confidently with the smell of blood in their nostrils. So it was good to see us start with a side that visibly took the wind out of the opponents' sails (their manager, in particular, looked set to throw up with trepidation). But we soon signalled to them that we were only prepared to sleepwalk through the game, which encouraged them to really have a go. What we need to do in future is not switch back to the old shambolic selection strategy but begin such games with cold and hard professionalism, treating it as a half-hour of ruthless and aggressive attacking.. Then we can take players off and bring on pretty much who we like. That's MUCH better than how we behaved against, say, Oldham, sending on Gerrard to chase a game against opponents who by that time were convinced they were destined for glory and quite prepared to injure anyone who threatened to spoil their day. Rodgers is going in the right direction. It's now up to the players to show the right attitude.


all well, but playing a 32yr old, who has hardly played any footie last season, for 3 games in a week is asking trouble. I don't understand why Agger didn't start instead of Toure. It would signify strength and Agger could take it.
 
If we were to start with a clearly unfit player, one who couldn't even make the bench for a Carling Cup match, then we would probably lose. Wisdom and an unfit Kelly as pair a of CBs - that doesn't inspire confidence, does it? If you want us to go out meekly in the first round of every competition, why bother at all?

Seeing as half of our players have been running out of steam in the first 3 matches there's not much difference (and instead Skrtell is going to start against United with no match play at all), and as I said I don't give a shit about the Capital Cup ... also please point out where I said 'go out meekly' and 'every competition' ...less of the hyperbole please.

If you can't give your squad players / youngsters a run out in a non-entity of a competition such as this then half of them are never going to get a game or be 'match-fit' when called upon for real.
 
Seeing as half of our players have been running out of steam in the first 3 matches there's not much difference (and instead Skrtell is going to start against United with no match play at all), and as I said I don't give a shit about the Capital Cup ... also please point out where I said 'go out meekly' and 'every competition' ...less of the hyperbole please.

If you can't give your squad players / youngsters a run out in a non-entity of a competition such as this then half of them are never going to get a game or be 'match-fit' when called upon for real.


It is, along with the fa cup, our only realistic chance of a trophy though and, until we drew utd away, our most realistic chance of getting into Europe next season. I can understand why Rogers didn't want to repeat the Northampton / Oldham debacles
 
Nope it wasn't. And it isn't a BS approach (except to some supporters). IMHO he benched the wrong players - as I posted in the pre-match thread. We don't know what may have happened had we fielded a different team but we do now know our defence has been weakened considerably for United, when it should be at it's strongerst, .. and that was eminently foreseeable. 4th or better is what will take this club forward .. you know where you can stick your Milk/League/Capitol cup if that ends up costing us a place in the CL due to injuries.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, isn't it? You can't coach a team if you're constantly on a "what if this happens or what if that happens" approach. You have to take each game as it comes. If Notts County had knocked us out are we fielded a weakened team we'd be a laughing stock. Was Oldham not a valuable lesson learned?

In any case, we're not going to agree on this. I respect your opinion. Even though it's wrong 😉
 
all well, but playing a 32yr old, who has hardly played any footie last season, for 3 games in a week is asking trouble. I don't understand why Agger didn't start instead of Toure. It would signify strength and Agger could take it.

Seemingly, Agger was also carrying a bit of a knock.
 
I really hope this is true.

Danny Brown@dannybrownlfc
Kolo Toure is fit for Sunday! He told me lil cousin today he was deffo playing against Man Utd! @LFCTS @LFC #LFC pic.twitter.com/Twb3zFavjj

BS2eSgHCQAAn_T4.jpg
 
Didn't Rafa sign Pellegrino and start him a few days later against united and we lost? Please Brendan don't rush into signing any center half with a pulse so you can throw them into the side at the weekend, not unless they're awesome.
 
Liverpool FC have received some positive news regarding Kolo Toure’s groin injury.
There were fears that the 32-year-old centre-back would be sidelined for up to six weeks after he was stretchered off in Tuesday night’s Capital One Cup tie against Notts County and left Anfield on crutches.
However, the damage isn’t that severe and Toure has responded well to treatment at Melwood.
The defender has yet to concede defeat in his battle to be fit for Sunday’s visit of Manchester United and will be reassessed today. - Echo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom