• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Torres gone. Scum gone to more scum

Forums Unread posts
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=FPI Project link=topic=43861.msg1269866#msg1269866 date=1296420595]
liorente?
[/quote]

Yes, although the latest one is apparently that he's signed a pre-contract with Real.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=43861.msg1269834#msg1269834 date=1296419354]
12 million dollars your honour!
[/quote]

I need 12 million for my sprained eyes.

Thanks for cheering me up old boy.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=43861.msg1269876#msg1269876 date=1296420769]
Yes, although the latest one is apparently that he's signed a pre-contract with Real.
[/quote]

Ballbag claimed Real will go for Adebayor and not Llorente.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=43861.msg1269864#msg1269864 date=1296420393]
There have been rumours to that effect in Spain apparently.
[/quote]

shit! really?!
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

I can't see us getting anyone in tomorrow. It took us long enough to get this far on the Suarez deal, and that's not officially announced until tomorrow. Torres has left us in the shit with this.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=LadyRed link=topic=43861.msg1269830#msg1269830 date=1296418912]
My mum said maybe you shouldn't have brought the new one as I think he doesnt like the new one and that's why he wants to leave. But even if he does go at least you've still got the new one.

My mum did actually genuinely say that
[/quote]

Is this possibly true?

Chelsea FC is FULL of unlikeable people.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=43861.msg1269883#msg1269883 date=1296421123]
I can't see us getting anyone in tomorrow. It took us long enough to get this far on the Suarez deal, and that's not officially announced until tomorrow. Torres has left us in the shit with this.
[/quote] if he goes?????
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=43861.msg1269883#msg1269883 date=1296421123]
I can't see us getting anyone in tomorrow. It took us long enough to get this far on the Suarez deal, and that's not officially announced until tomorrow. Torres has left us in the shit with this.
[/quote]

you'd hope the SECOND torres handed in his TR liverpool sounded out replacements.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

He might have, but theres little chance to bring in any real quality in 3 days.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Avvy link=topic=43861.msg1269889#msg1269889 date=1296421415]
He might have, but theres little chance to bring in any real quality in 3 days.
[/quote]anelka?
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Avvy link=topic=43861.msg1269889#msg1269889 date=1296421415]
He might have, but theres little chance to bring in any real quality in 3 days.
[/quote]

If there's any truth in the Llorente links (most probably wishful thinking) we'd only have to trigger his clause (approx 26-29m) to talk to him.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

Anelka is exactly the sort of player we don't need at this club. He's old, well on the way down, has no resale value, is certainly not worth a 10m valuation if it's 40 + Anelka.

And what's the point anyway? Anelka isn't the sort of forward we need even short term, given our midfield issues.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=FPI Project link=topic=43861.msg1269890#msg1269890 date=1296421473]
anelka?
[/quote]

The problem I have with this is that they will price Anelka into the deal at the price they see fit (to drive down the amount of transfer money they have to pay), so they will probably value him at £10m.

If someone said last week that we'd bid £10m for Anelka, I reckon more than a few people would be miffed at us bidding so much for a player his age.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=FPI Project link=topic=43861.msg1269890#msg1269890 date=1296421473]
anelka?
[/quote]

:-\
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Farkmaster link=topic=43861.msg1269892#msg1269892 date=1296421584]
Anelka is exactly the sort of player we don't need at this club. He's old, well on the way down, has no resale value, is certainly not worth a 10m valuation if it's 40 + Anelka.

And what's the point anyway? Anelka isn't the sort of forward we need even short term, given our midfield issues.
[/quote]

Ha, echoing my sentiments Farky.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=43861.msg1269893#msg1269893 date=1296421591]
The problem I have with this is that they will price Anelka into the deal at the price they see fit (to drive down the amount of transfer money they have to pay), so they will probably value him at £10m.

If someone said last week that we'd bid £10m for Anelka, I reckon more than a few people would be miffed at us bidding so much for a player his age.
[/quote]

If they want Torres they'll price Anelka at the price *we* see fit, or they can go peddle peanuts.

I take the criticisms of Anelka above, but he'd be a sight better than not signing anyone.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=43861.msg1269897#msg1269897 date=1296421751]
If they want Torres they'll price Anelka at the price *we* see fit, or they can go peddle peanuts.

I take the criticisms of Anelka above, but he'd be a sight better than not signing anyone.
[/quote]

£49m + Anelka then.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Farkmaster link=topic=43861.msg1269892#msg1269892 date=1296421584]
Anelka is exactly the sort of player we don't need at this club. He's old, well on the way down, has no resale value, is certainly not worth a 10m valuation if it's 40 + Anelka.

And what's the point anyway? Anelka isn't the sort of forward we need even short term, given our midfield issues.
[/quote]

Spot on. He's exactly the kind of signing FSG will strive to avoid.
£50m straight up, in one big lump or they can fuck off.

Seriously though, he is going to play and score against us next weekend. I just know it.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Buddha link=topic=43861.msg1269891#msg1269891 date=1296421559]
If there's any truth in the Llorente links (most probably wishful thinking) we'd only have to trigger his clause (approx 26-29m) to talk to him.
[/quote]

if there is a chance we've got to go for it as the guy is quality. fuck chelsea's rejects.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=43861.msg1269901#msg1269901 date=1296421872]
if there is a chance we've got to go for it as the guy is quality. fuck chelsea's rejects.
[/quote]

I agree, but is there physically enough time to do this deal? Probably not.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

Liverpool striker Fernando Torres wants to leave the club because he feels that he can develop further as a player at a different club, according to journalist Guillem Balague.

Torres rejected interest from both Chelsea and Manchester City in the summer to stay with the club because of the loyalty he felt towards the club and its fans.

The Spanish World Cup winner shocked his employers this week by handing in a transfer request after Chelsea lodged an offer for the striker’s services.

Liverpool promptly rejected the request and stated they expected Torres to honour his contract.

“For Fernando Torres to take the step that he has taken to hand in a transfer request officially, knowing perfectly well the philosophy of the club and the love the fans have for him, it’s a huge step," Balague told Sky Sports.

"He’s done it because something was brewing in his mind, something made him realise that the pace of the club is not the pace that he needs in terms of developing.

“In his head the need to go is so huge that he is going to have to handle whatever the consequences of that is.â€

Torres had still been expected to stay after the Merseyside club rejected his transfer request, however it now seems that Liverpool are open to negotiation for their striker.

Balague added: “It is clear they are talking and there is at least the possibility of a negotiation and we have to wait until 11 o’clock tomorrow [the transfer deadline] to find out.€
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

Tomorrows gonna be shit and stressy isn't it

stress.jpg
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Farkmaster link=topic=43861.msg1269892#msg1269892 date=1296421584]
Anelka is exactly the sort of player we don't need at this club. He's old, well on the way down, has no resale value, is certainly not worth a 10m valuation if it's 40 + Anelka.

And what's the point anyway? Anelka isn't the sort of forward we need even short term, given our midfield issues.
[/quote]

I think he would be a very good short term option especially as we have next to no time getting a proper replacement(at sensible price anyway) if Torres goes. He hasn't been in the best form but I reckon he has a lot to offer still especially if played as central striker. Now he's playing as wide forward and it doesn't really suit him with his age catching on a bit and affecting the attributes required there.

I agree we shouldn't be paying much for him. Absolute maximum should be £5m but I'd prefer a loan with an option to buy for a small fee like £3-4m at the end of the season. Once we manage to get a proper striker in he could still be a very good squad player if he agrees to stay on sensible wages.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

Its going to be fucking horrible.
The only positive I can think of is that massive fucking cunt Andy Burton is suspended from sky and will not be LIVE with his 50 mobile phones talking bollocks.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

"develop further as a player"

Here we go. The first of the usual, previously unmentioned, excuses trotted out to try to reduce the impact of such treachery. Like he can't wait another 6 months to make a 'development' move?
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Akakabooto link=topic=43861.msg1269912#msg1269912 date=1296422485]
I think he would be a very good short term option especially as we have next to no time getting a proper replacement(at sensible price anyway) if Torres goes. He hasn't been in the best form but I reckon he has a lot to offer still especially if played as central striker. Now he's playing as wide forward and it doesn't really suit him with his age catching on a bit and affecting the attributes required there.

I agree we shouldn't be paying much for him. Absolute maximum should be £5m but I'd prefer a loan with an option to buy for a small fee like £3-4m at the end of the season. Once we manage to get a proper striker in he could still be a very good squad player if he agrees to stay on sensible wages.
[/quote]

He won't agree to sensible wages though. He'll want top whack, he's on top whack now, why should he take less?
He also won't want to be a squadie either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6cmRed
  • Locked
SkySports LFC Were West Ham unlucky not to have a penalty for handball?
Replies
0
Views
13
6cmRed
6cmRed
localny
    • Like
Pinch Me (5)
Replies
8
Views
394
Modo
Modo
MomoWASright
    • Like
    • Happy
    • Love
Other forum meltdown watch 24/25
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Replies
477
Views
15K
darkstarexodus
darkstarexodus
Modo
    • Like
A new CB?
2
Replies
48
Views
839
moron
moron
Woland
    • Like
    • Haha
    • Love
Things we were very wrong about in 2024
2 3 4
Replies
96
Views
2K
Judge Jules
Judge Jules
Back
Top Bottom