Top 4 Rivals : Transfers and Discussion
- Thread starter Frogfish
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
I don't think I've ever wanted someone to fail quite as much as this spoon mirror faced cunt.
I like to think I would dislike him even if he played for us. He seems like an intolerable cunt and has done from day one.
Conte clearly follows a plan for a short-term rebuild – they've beefed up the midfield with Bentancour and Bissouma, looks like Eriksen will be the creative midfielder and now the biggest issue will be fixing the leaky defense. If he gets the players he wants, Spurs will be significantly stronger next season.
Spurs will overtake Chelsea for 3rd next season I reckon. But the short time fix Conte is after now probably wont serve Spurs well going forward when he decides to fuck off.
Chelsea will regress, Arsenal pretty much the same and who knows about Utd at this stage.
Chelsea will regress, Arsenal pretty much the same and who knows about Utd at this stage.
Lol I don't think he had a low release clause because Dortmund "didn't realise how good he'd become".
It was because the greedy, conniving bastards in charge of his affairs have planned out every stage of his career to squeeze out every drop of money for themselves, and a low transfer fee just leaves more in the pot for them.
It was because the greedy, conniving bastards in charge of his affairs have planned out every stage of his career to squeeze out every drop of money for themselves, and a low transfer fee just leaves more in the pot for them.
Chelsea are losing Rudiger, Christensen and potentially Marcos Alonso and Azpilicueta.
Kante could move.
New ownership.
Seemed to lose a bit of their identity at the end of the season.
Havent seen anything yet to prove otherwise than that Chelsea will regress next season.
Kante could move.
New ownership.
Seemed to lose a bit of their identity at the end of the season.
Havent seen anything yet to prove otherwise than that Chelsea will regress next season.
It's not necessarily lack of nouse. Ten Haag is going to have to dramatically change the way they play, and a way of helping that is to bring in players who will already know how to train and play the way the manager wants everyone else to do so. Plus there's a difference between Man Utd trying to sign Frenkie De Jong/Jurrien Timber and us signing Joe Allen and Fabio Borini.
Connor Gallagher is pretty ace tbf. They get him for nothing.
Haven't the new owners promised lots of cash this first summer? If they manage to sign a really good centre half they should be ok.
But yeah I doubt they'll be challenging us or City.
Aids? The clap? Dodgy knees? A nonce record?
Lukaku also desperately wants out and they may have to loan him, so no imminent money for a replacement, or risk the atmosphere between him and Tuchel getting even worse.
I agree. Tuchel has done a great job to date, but now some of their experienced pros want out, and their attacking options have never fitted together into any coherent plan or structure. It's going to be a huge year it adjustment on and off the pitch.
I like to imagine his agent arguing over image rights.
City always score shit loads of goals. Buying the spoon faced dog shagging twat doesn’t address the issues they have at the back.
From beyond the grave?
I think that is right, yes.
Reports seem to be that the new owners are trying to take a different approach to transfers, rather than the previous way of just throwing money around and if it doesn’t work out, just throw even more around.
All well and good for them, of course, but presumably they need to have people there who can do that properly.
No, it doesnt. But Haaland will score goals and loads of them. He missed 16 games this season and I think he might miss the same amount next season given the intensity of the PL. Injuries can be his downfall.
Do they need a Lukaku replacement though? Havertz looks pretty great imo just playing up top.
Chelsea have loads of good young players if you ask me. But then they are definitely a bit young overall. In 2 or 3 years they could be a frightening prospect, particularly if they buy well now.
I hope Robbo clatters him fairly and caused the cunt to rupture something. The fume would be tremendous.
And Dortmund wouldn't have been wise to that? It was either a great bit of work by his manager or Dortmund under-valued him. I think it was the later - look where he was coming from, he clearly exceeded all expectations.
Not a direct one, I agree Havertz looks best suited to them in a false 9 role, but having an £80M asset out on loan is never ideal. I'm sure they'd prefer cash in the bank to fund a mini rebuild/replacements elsewhere.
No it was just part of the deal. We'll let you have this great young player cheap for a couple of years and in return you let him go when he's all nice and fat and ready for market so we can make a killing.
Of course they'd defo be better off if they could just flog him and get their money back, but it's still not a disaster in an absolute sense. They seem to have enough good players and money/saleable assets that they should still be fine - as long as they buy fairly well.
- Status
