Yes, names are important. There should be no chance at all that a footballer who is called fucking "Laser" could be anything other than boss.
We never learn.
Thomas Lemar
- Thread starter Mystic
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Yes, names are important. There should be no chance at all that a footballer who is called fucking "Laser" could be anything other than boss.
We never learn.
Been told today that we've ended our interest in him.
Look how that ended with big Virgil
Do you ever get told good news? Haha
It's reported in the Echo today..
I think Hal has a friend that works there or something
I would rather we go for Pulisic than Lemar.
He is more flexible with his positioning and will represent better value for money.
Yeah, didn't realise it had actually been reported today. Apparently Klopp is sick of being asked questions about Lemar so the club has briefed the media to put out that we're not interested. You could look at that two ways, really.
The same lad told me he reckons we'll be after Lanzini in the summer.
I'm sure if there was ever any good news to be had, I'd be told!
Lanzini for Coutinho would be straight out of the Aquilani for Alonso and Balotelli for Suarez school of incompetence.
Pearce, always the bearer of bad news.
That said, if Monaco won’t budge from their £90M valuation maybe we should focus on other targets. As much as I like Lemar, he hasn’t done enough yet to be worth Pogba money.
Neither has Pogba.
I'm confused
So klopp clearly has backup targets then? And will settle for second best?
I thought that wasn't his style
(I'm still pissed over the centre back shite in the summer, don't mean to be snarky)
Oh fuck.
So business as usual then
Price clearly has a say.
Yes, as do (a) difference in quality and (b) urgency of need. If Klopp reckons there's a second choice out there who is LFC standard, though maybe not quite as good as the first choice, I'm sure he'd be in for him if the need were great enough. If he thinks either of those factors doesn't apply, though, he'll hold out for the top choice and IMO rightly so. This is absolutely not the simple "one in, one out" equation that too many on here seem to think it is.
Tbf we had loads of players on high wages who were shit. Trouble is we didn't replace them with players who are good
You'd gladly fall to your knees and start praying upon the slightest chance that policy ever extended to our goalkeepers.
Yeh, i'm kind of with you on this, for years people were complaining that we have too much bloat in the squad, and we need to trim the fat, we do that, and people still complain. I agree there's an issue we need to resolve with us not properly replacing a couple of the players when then leave, but the numbers game people are playing here is dishonest to our previous situation.
Yeah. There's some merit in both sides of the argument, deffo
- Status
