Next season we should look at 4-4-2 which will allow for more rotation of our strikers
No we shouldn’t and no it wouldn’t.
Next season we should look at 4-4-2 which will allow for more rotation of our strikers
Stop being status quo merchant. You end up agreeing with me anyway (like needing MFs, like finishing outside the top four if we didn't get any, and like having Trent in MF). I swear you even ended up liking Ugarte.No we shouldn’t and no it wouldn’t.
Stop being status quo merchant. You end up agreeing with me anyway (like needing MFs, like finishing outside the top four if we didn't get any, and like having Trent in MF). I swear you even ended up liking Ugarte.
I disagree - with pretty much everything ! Opinions eh.
Elliott has a long way to go to reach the standard of a Thuram or Ali Mac or to proving he is capable of starting in a PL challenging side, so no I don't see him starting ever unless we have 3 midfielders down, and no I don't believe Klopp would leave better players on the bench unless forced into it, Thiago, Fabs, Gini and more recently Gakpo, Diaz and even Nunez were all in from the start or very shortly thereafter, with a full pre-season there would be zero reason not to start them from the off.
If we buy 3 midfielders it would be far better for Elliott to go out on loan.
I disagree - with pretty much everything ! Opinions eh.
Elliott has a long way to go to reach the standard of a Thuram or Ali Mac or to proving he is capable of starting in a PL challenging side, so no I don't see him starting ever unless we have 3 midfielders down, and no I don't believe Klopp would leave better players on the bench unless forced into it, Thiago, Fabs, Gini and more recently Gakpo, Diaz and even Nunez were all in from the start or very shortly thereafter, with a full pre-season there would be zero reason not to start them from the off.
If we buy 3 midfielders it would be far better for Elliott to go out on loan.
Weren't Ojo Ibe Ejaria Brewster Solanke all binned off by Klopp? They weren't good enough and we received decent offers for them, so off they went. Don't be fooled into thinking the same wouldn't happen to Harvey.
He barely featured in the last 10 games of the season when we went on that unbeaten run.
I think Ojo and Ejaria were released for free.
Why not ask Torres? Or Suarez ? Or any of the other top players who have come straight into the side and been successful. It's a very illogical argument ... PL proven.Regardless of whether Harvey is ace or not, he stays and plays.
Klopp is not going to get rid of young players who know the system and are premier league “proven” and replace them immediately with young players that have never played in England.
The step up from France and Germany and then to our system is a big one - ask Fabs.
Whatever his ceiling is, and we'll have to agree to differ there although obviously I hope you're right, he's not at the level, or anywhere near, that of the players we are bringing in, it's why they are rated £35m and way up and he's a 20 yr old kid that's not.Elliot is 2 years younger than Thuram and 4 years younger than Mac Allister - he’s arguably played more at a high level than both at the same age and suffered significant time out with injury.
I don’t think a loan is the worst idea - but it’s down to that old problem - we either have to buy ready-made players over the age of 21 or we need to give younger players the game time they need to develop.
I think there were times last season Harvey was our best midfielder and that’s not ideal - He’d be another that would benefit from have a more settled, better and more function midfield around him.
To be honest - I think he’s ideal for what we need - there are things he needs to improve, but if that right sided role is about creativity, providing the overlap outside Salah, ball retention & possession and closing down & pressing - then I think he’s got the skills, the attitude, work rate and most importantly time on his side to be a very good player for us.
Why not ask Torres? Or Suarez ? Or any of the other top players who have come straight into the side and been successful. It's a very illogical argument ... PL proven.
And Elliott isn't all that so they wouldn't have to be that great to be better.
Whatever his ceiling is, and we'll have to agree to differ there although obviously I hope you're right, he's not at the level, or anywhere near, that of the players we are bringing in, it's why they are rated £35m and way up and he's a 20 yr old kid that's not.
So assuming we bring in 3 (MacAli, Thuram +1) and that Hendo (BU RM), Fabs (BU DM), Thiago (BU LM) and Bajectic (a better player for us IMO and BU DM, BU RM) and Doak (a far better RW and Salah BU than Elliott) are still here that leaves him way down the pecking order. A loan should happen.
You're missing the point. Freshred said he'd start Elliott over our new midfielders and bed them in slowly, which he said is the Klopp way. I totally disagreed and gave examples of Klopp playing new signings from the off and them not needing to bed in.If we’d signed Suarez or Torres at 20 they’d likely have not been regular starters for us either.
At 20, Torres was in his second season playing in La Liga with Atletico and Suarez was leaving Groningen for Ajax.
I don’t think the comparisons are either fair or valid.
At 20, Elliot has played more games for Liverpool than Trent, Henderson was still at Sunderland at 20, having played less Premier League games than Elliot.
At 20, Elliot has played only a few less premier league games and scored the same amount of premier league goals (1) as Steven Gerrard.
At 20, Elliot has a record similar to James Milner - Milner has played more and scored 1 more goal.
None of this means Harvey is as good as any of them - though it also doesn’t mean he can’t achieve a significant amount in the game.
I think people are writing him off way to early - he only turned 20 in April.
I’m all for bringing in another midfielder to play on the right - with whoever that is and Harvey competing for that spot with Hendo being phased out.
You're missing the point. Freshred said he'd start Elliott over our new midfielders and bed them in slowly, which he said is the Klopp way. I totally disagreed and gave examples of Klopp playing new signings from the off and them not needing to bed in.
It has absolutely nothing to do with Elliott being 20 yrs old ... other than he's clearly not at their level and I don't believe he'll get many starts, and nor should he because he's nowhere near their (AliMac & Thuram's) standard.
Yes he's is. Look at the stats and the experience and, as you mentioned, his age!Is he really that far off Thuram?
I honestly wouldn’t know because I don’t watch the French league.
I’m sure he looks good beside Ross Barkley & Aaron Ramsey?
From what I’ve read, he’s not the finished article either - so I would question whether he’d slot right in.
Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t - took Fabinho a bit of time to settle.
Yep, we are fucked, do ypu think the Kuwaitis or that quiet place Oman would be interested in us ?Let's get in the 3 MFs and then worry about where Elliott plays...I don't want to go into next season with Elliott in our starting 11 not until he shows he is upto standard. It lookslike the Sheikh's Jassim will take over United - so now 3 clubs owned by State enterprises. The Dubai Royal family are relative paupers compared to the Al-Thanis, Al Nahyans and Al Sauds.
I am expecting Man U will hoover up some of the best talents that will become available
I’ve said it a million times, but Harvey is the closest thing I’ve seen to a young Shaqiri that’s out there.
He’s a lovely player, but will likely never be first choice in a title challenging side.
Not in a Klopp side he wouldn’t have, he didn’t have the defensive qualities (no saying Mo always do either but then again no one can do what Mo does offensively)Shaqiri was potentially good enough to start for a title-winning side, but he just had too many injuries. Let’s hope Elliott proves more durable. Need to go easy on the gym.
You're missing the point. Freshred said he'd start Elliott over our new midfielders and bed them in slowly, which he said is the Klopp way. I totally disagreed and gave examples of Klopp playing new signings from the off and them not needing to bed in.
It has absolutely nothing to do with Elliott being 20 yrs old ... other than he's clearly not at their level and I don't believe he'll get many starts, and nor should he because he's nowhere near their (AliMac & Thuram's) standard.
We have this general penchant of writing off our young players while at the same time looking longingly at other teams’ young but not more “skilled” players.I've always maintained that RCM doesn't do Elliott any favours. RW might be slightly better, but not much. He would thrive as a 10; arguably he could have done more than jones in the more advanced LCM spot when trent has possession.
Elliott has such a high ceiling, and the one extra thing he has for him is his application is second to none. He loves playing for us, and he tries without fail every game. If he could improve stamina, or improve strength he could be great. I don't see an immediate rush to loan him out, when he will get games this year, as our midfield playstyle is very harsh on the muscles. I do think he'll start a lot in the first few months of the season, as the new signings get up to speed with conditioning
Why restrict yourself to midfielders? That's being very selective especially when bar Thiago we haven't bought any recently!What midfielder has Klopp played straight away other than Thiago, who then broke?
I am not saying Elliott is amazing or that he starts every game, but he is going stay and will get plenty of game time. That is all.
Klopp will not sell him.
Not surprising. In the past decade or more we have only brought through one regular 1st team starter.We have this general penchant of writing off our young players while at the same time looking longingly at other teams’ young but not more “skilled” players.