Re: The Suarez/Evra Racism Row (continued)
[quote author=vantage link=topic=47188.msg1454069#msg1454069 date=1325511643]
[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=47188.msg1454006#msg1454006 date=1325506057]
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=48021.msg1453998#msg1453998 date=1325505088]
The guy from the post has nailed it
It really is fucking comical, well it would be if it were not so serious how a three man committee have done this without a shred of hard evidence or any witness including their own officials or United players. This was patently not fair nor have we seen justice as we know it here.
Those of you who think Suarez probably is guilty should be more concerned with the method used than the outcome, if this method was used to convict any other person in any other walk of life the whining from the Civil Liberties brigade would be deafening.
I am not sure what to think about guilt or not, and indeed that should not come into it, what I do know and and am now certain of is that our man did not have a fair hearing and unless he does have a fair hearing , where real evidence is available and presented in a proper manner or an appeal is upheld then I personally will never consider him guilty, the rest of you can think what the fuck you like.
For you lawyers and barrack room lawyers what about Lord Hewart from Rex v Sussex Justices; Ex parte McCarthy:
“… it is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance, that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.”
This does not apply just in courts of law but in all conflicts, and if anyone after all these pages of discussion can say justice has seen to be done I would be amazed
It's actually disgusting, and I am amazed that so many posters I have a lot of respect for can argue otherwise.
regards
[/quote]Good post Vlad.
I think my take on it is slightly different in that Ive seen the same evidence you have and have drawn the logical conclusion that I have come to. I dont really care what the FA take on it is, ultimately the lad will miss a few games of football, hes not going the gulag or owt.
Whats of more concern to me is that i dont like him, I KNOW hes a cheat and a liar as ive seen it MANY times with my own eyes, I dont think ive seen anything to suggest I should see him as the innocent party here.
Like I said you ultimately have to make up your own mind about what you think took place as there isnt a great deal of hard evidence, all I can say is it looks to me like there is ANOTHER unsavoury aspect to luis Suarez aside from the ones we already know.
Maybe youre right about a kangaroo court and all that and maybe others are right in that certain individuals care so much about costing Liverpool that they would attemp to ruin a players good name on a whim.
Me I tend to think the lad is a racist who has been fingered and caught.
I think perhaps based on the evidence they have, we could appeal and win as there isnt any PROOF of guilt. But I dont think we should appeal. Simply because I think he did it, and as a club we should have more class than to try and get someone who racially abused another player off on a technicality.
Just my own opinion. Not right or wrong of course.
[/quote]
The FA have said they don't consider him to be racist, PE has said he doesn't consider him to be a racist, yet you think he is?
Even given all the support he has from his countrymen & continent? Even considering PE was abusing him? It was heat of the moment stuff on a football field. His grandfather is/was black. And you think he's a racist?
I've read some bollocks on here before, but frankly that is one of the most absurd statements yet.
[/quote]Fair enough.
[quote author=vantage link=topic=47188.msg1454069#msg1454069 date=1325511643]
[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=47188.msg1454006#msg1454006 date=1325506057]
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=48021.msg1453998#msg1453998 date=1325505088]
The guy from the post has nailed it
It really is fucking comical, well it would be if it were not so serious how a three man committee have done this without a shred of hard evidence or any witness including their own officials or United players. This was patently not fair nor have we seen justice as we know it here.
Those of you who think Suarez probably is guilty should be more concerned with the method used than the outcome, if this method was used to convict any other person in any other walk of life the whining from the Civil Liberties brigade would be deafening.
I am not sure what to think about guilt or not, and indeed that should not come into it, what I do know and and am now certain of is that our man did not have a fair hearing and unless he does have a fair hearing , where real evidence is available and presented in a proper manner or an appeal is upheld then I personally will never consider him guilty, the rest of you can think what the fuck you like.
For you lawyers and barrack room lawyers what about Lord Hewart from Rex v Sussex Justices; Ex parte McCarthy:
“… it is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance, that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.”
This does not apply just in courts of law but in all conflicts, and if anyone after all these pages of discussion can say justice has seen to be done I would be amazed
It's actually disgusting, and I am amazed that so many posters I have a lot of respect for can argue otherwise.
regards
[/quote]Good post Vlad.
I think my take on it is slightly different in that Ive seen the same evidence you have and have drawn the logical conclusion that I have come to. I dont really care what the FA take on it is, ultimately the lad will miss a few games of football, hes not going the gulag or owt.
Whats of more concern to me is that i dont like him, I KNOW hes a cheat and a liar as ive seen it MANY times with my own eyes, I dont think ive seen anything to suggest I should see him as the innocent party here.
Like I said you ultimately have to make up your own mind about what you think took place as there isnt a great deal of hard evidence, all I can say is it looks to me like there is ANOTHER unsavoury aspect to luis Suarez aside from the ones we already know.
Maybe youre right about a kangaroo court and all that and maybe others are right in that certain individuals care so much about costing Liverpool that they would attemp to ruin a players good name on a whim.
Me I tend to think the lad is a racist who has been fingered and caught.
I think perhaps based on the evidence they have, we could appeal and win as there isnt any PROOF of guilt. But I dont think we should appeal. Simply because I think he did it, and as a club we should have more class than to try and get someone who racially abused another player off on a technicality.
Just my own opinion. Not right or wrong of course.
[/quote]
The FA have said they don't consider him to be racist, PE has said he doesn't consider him to be a racist, yet you think he is?
Even given all the support he has from his countrymen & continent? Even considering PE was abusing him? It was heat of the moment stuff on a football field. His grandfather is/was black. And you think he's a racist?
I've read some bollocks on here before, but frankly that is one of the most absurd statements yet.
[/quote]Fair enough.