Love the negativity in here. Clarke didn't do too badly. Let's give him a chance to have a go at them at home
He picked Westwood, who yep didn't play well. But had huge experience and we needed that. Can't go there with a team of fucking rookies. Same with kaymer. There's a guy who holes the winning putt last time round.
Willett was shite but what can Clarke do about that? He was an auto selection.
At the end of the day, the yanks were better and we all knew it before the tournament anyway.
Let's just be happy that we have a few rookies with a bit of experience now, pieters, Fitzpatrick, Wood, etc are the future.
Yeah, was gonna say something similar. Easy to criticise Clarke, but when the players don't perform - you're always going to get the 'poor captain' stick.
A captain makes thousands of decisions before and during the Ryder Cup - of course he's going to get some wrong.
On the wrong count; selecting Westwood, not picking Cabrera-Bello on Saturday afternoon, and putting Rose out so often with Stenson.
But there's plenty he got right; particularly the Pieters pick - which was ballsy as fuck at the time, partnering him with McIlroy too, and selecting risky fourballs on Friday to get us back into it.
At the end of the day, he has little control over going 4-zip down on the first morning, it's not his fault that Justin Rose can't hole a fucking putt in a weekend of golf, and what's he supposed to do if Westwood misses putts from inside 3 feet consecutively. Sure I get the 'he picked his mate' stuff, but this was a team replete with inexperience in Wood, Fitzpatrick, Sullivan, Willett, CB, etc - he HAD to pick experience with his selections. I daresay he didn't think his 'mate' - a 20 year pro would let him and his continent down so badly when it mattered.
At the end of the day, America had better players play better golf.