Generally it's a pretty good indicator. Unless you are comparing players at different positions.
Are you saying that Mascher has a lower accuracy rate because he is a more adventurous passer than Lucas? If you are, that's clearly not the case. Lucas plays more forward passes than Mascher and still gets better accuracy % - so he is clearly the better passer. This should not be even an argument, just like there is no argument than Mascher offers a more powerful defensive presence.
On current form, I would take Mascher over Lucas, no question. But potentially Lucas is a better fit for the team Rodgers is trying to build. That's why I am a little cool on the idea of signing a midfield destroyer. When Lucas recovers his best form (and he will; I have complete faith in his work ethic), we won't have space in the starting 11 for a player like that any more.
This exactly; my intention in writing my posts was to say almost exactly the same thing but maybe I didn't express myself properly.