[quote author=robinhood link=topic=44445.msg1296845#msg1296845 date=1299531186]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=44445.msg1296843#msg1296843 date=1299531065]
[quote author=robinhood link=topic=44445.msg1296839#msg1296839 date=1299530812]
He's had bad games, like anybody else, at times on and off his whole career.
Most of them when played as a striker.
[/quote]
That's mental RH, no offence. He's had most of his bad games when played off the striker (and when has he played AS a striker?)? Are you having a laugh? His record when he played off Torres was exceptional, the only thing that's hampered his game in the last 18 months is injuries that disrupted his partnership with Fernando and his last two games when returning from injury.
[/quote]
Second striker is a striker; that's what I mean by striker.
And yes, there was a very good stretch - true, but before the good stretch there was a long time where it wasn't working and we've seen plenty of it after too; that's what I mean by "most of them".
[/quote]
I still don't agree or see where you're coming from at all, his goals and assists counts upped when he moved from central midfield. Some people think he should be in there pulling the strings, fair enough, hardly surprising given our only other options are Lucas and Poulsen, but that doesn't make him better there.
Maybe earlier in his career it was good to see him play there, but he was more dynamic then and the team operated more or less around him, we had a work-hard midfield which gave him the licence to roam without much sacrifice on us defensively, but the game is different now, the team is different and he's older. And as I said, statistically speaking his goals and assists tallies were better when more advanced anyway. I'm not saying he can't play there, but saying he's 'better' there to the extent where you think he's had most of his shit games when playing (and as a result of playing) as a striker is well wide of the mark.