• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Sterling contract

Status
Not open for further replies.

Modo

A contentious scando
Member
Liverpool forward Raheem Sterling 'nowhere near agreement' over new deal despite £70,000-a-week offer

After being offered a weekly payrise of £40,000, Liverpool youngster is understood to be unhappy with £70,000 a week wages following disappointing Champions League exit


Raheem_Sterling_3134649b.jpg

Money matters: Raheem Sterling is understood to be happy with his new terms Photo: GETTY IMAGES


By Henry Winter, Football Correspondent
9:00PM GMT 10 Dec 2014

In the wake of their Champions League exit, Liverpool need to make a statement of intent quickly about their ambitions and that means sorting out Raheem Sterling’s future. Liverpool and Sterling are “nowhere near any agreement” on a new contract, according to a source close to negotiations, although there are hopes of an eventual resolution.

Sterling faces his 100th game for Liverpool against Manchester United at Old Trafford on Sunday and has been one of their stars of 2014. Sterling, who turned 20 on Monday, dovetailed brilliantly with Daniel Sturridge andLuis Suárez last season and, following a brief dip, signaled his talent again in recent games, particularly in the win over Leicester City last week. His form has not been at last season’s phenomenal levels but he represents a vital part of Liverpool’s future.

He played out on the right against Basel and then centre-forward but any praise for his selflessness and versatility was lost amidst Liverpool’s dismay at bowing out of the Champions League. With Sturridge injured, Suárez transferred to Barcelona and Mario Balotelli yet to justify his £16m purchase, Sterling has become even more important. He is a beacon of hope in difficult times for Liverpool.

Liverpool have been keen to tie down their most valuable player to a long-term deal. Sterling, whose current deal has more than two years left to run, is on roughly £30,000 with assorted first-team appearance bonuses. Liverpool’s new offer is understood to be £70,000 a week with handsome bonuses for progress in the major competitions.
Now that Liverpool are out of the Champions League and labouring in the Premier League the prospect of additional payments is clearly less likely. The offer was described as “nowhere near acceptable” by the source.


It is to be hoped that this is simply usual negotiating practice and that an agreement can be reached to secure the player’s long-term services, providing a well-timed fillip for the team. Brendan Rodgers, Liverpool’s manager, has already emphasised that he is “absolutely adamant” that Sterling is staying. Rodgers has also stated that he believes Sterling understands that Anfield is “the perfect place for him”. Liverpool’s manager enthused talked last week of the player’s willingness to “take on extra responsibility”, adding “he’s such a threat”.

Sterling, who has been linked with clubs like Real Madrid and Paris Saint-Germain, has always indicated his desire to remain at Anfield and is “committed to the club” added the source. He has flourished under Rodgers, who has appreciated the youngster’s tactical versatility, including playing in the hole, as well as the pace and finishing touch that has brought him 15 goals for Liverpool.

Sterling has also become an established England international over the past 18 months, and Rodgers deserves credit for assisting that development. Rodgers also defended the player stoutly following Roy Hodgson’s unhelpful public mention of Sterling feeling too “tired” to train before England’s game in Estonia in October.

To borrow the words of the Beatles, Sterling and Liverpool should focus on the ethos of “we can work it out”. Sterling’s progress can continue under Rodgers before a later, lucrative move to the likes of Real Madrid. He would not currently get in Real’s starting XI whereas he is learning fast at Anfield. Yet there will be frustration for Sterling that Liverpool have not progressed in the major competitions, that some of the signings are not up to the standards expected of an ambitious club like Liverpool.

He has played in three competitions for Liverpool this season, including a surprise involvement in the Capital One Cup against Middlesbrough. Sterling could be forgiven for being slightly confused when he plays two hours against Middlesbrough in the Capital One Cup but then starts on the bench at the Bernabéu in Liverpool’s most prestigious game of the season against Real.

Sterling cost only £600,000 when signed from QPR’s Academy in 2010 and has come to embody the Liverpool that Rodgers and their American owners want to portray: young, swift, clever and attack-minded. Liverpool simply cannot afford to lose him.
 
He's worth £100,000 a week given he cost fuck all for us to buy.

We're a couple of players away from being a mid-table time. Now is not the time to quibble on wages.
 
Take him into a darkened room, beat the shit out of him, beat the shit out of his agent, tell him to play better. Tough love. To borrow the words of The Beatles: 'The movement you need is on your shoulder'.
 
He'll be destroyed after this season anyway so there's no need to worry if he doesn't sign.
 
He'll be on a million quid a week in no time at this rate. Sign a contract, ask for a new one a month later, and repeat.
 
Give him 5 years at 100k.

His peak is more than likely between now and age 25, and if its not its because he turns into one of the best in the game. It's a win win situation.

But if as always our luck broadly follows the Red Sox, then we'll low ball him and watch him get paid elsewhere like the Red Sox did to Lester.
 
When the likes of Skrtel and Johnson are on 90+ a week, playing hard ball with Sterling is pointless. He could be one of the best in the league in years to come, just keep him happy and spend the time saved working out how to keep him surrounded with quality players.
 
Yeh, just give Johnson's contract to Sterling, it seems pretty simple to me, if the club expect him to be our saviour (which at the moment they clearly do), we have to pay him like he's one.
 
70000 is stupid - it really is. Give him an offer where he would look greedy saying no. This just invites sharks in the water...
 
We maybe have to accept that we will never have too many big stars on our books if FFP coming in as we will never be able to cover the wages for too many huge stars unless we were to reduce the number of squad players on ~£40k a week and relied more on youth as backups when needed.
 
That's bollocks. We've got one of the biggest global supports going, massive sponsorship and shirt deals, an extra 15,000 seats being built, ticket prices higher than most. The idea that we're some backwater club with no money is ridiculous. In the latest Forbes list we're the 10th richest football club in the world, and that was before we got back in the CL, before the latest England TV deal which will probs put us above any Italian sides, and obviously before this ground redevelopment has gone through.

We had over 120 million in the summer and blew it. Kenny blew 70 odd a couple of years ago. If that 200 million would have been spent correct we'd be as good as anyone in Europe. LFC is massive and can compete with every club out there.
 
That's bollocks. We've got one of the biggest global supports going, massive sponsorship and shirt deals, an extra 15,000 seats being built, ticket prices higher than most. The idea that we're some backwater club with no money is ridiculous. In the latest Forbes list we're the 10th richest football club in the world, and that was before we got back in the CL, before the latest England TV deal which will probs put us above any Italian sides, and obviously before this ground redevelopment has gone through.

We had over 120 million in the summer and blew it. Kenny blew 70 odd a couple of years ago. If that 200 million would have been spent correct we'd be as good as anyone in Europe. LFC is massive and can compete with every club out there.


When it comes to wages which I believe need to be proportionate to income then I don't agree that will will be able to compete in terms of housing a number of players on 150k+. We spunk big cash on transfer fees but we don't ever go that big on wages which is what the real top class players will demand. I've never considered us to be competitive with wage demands in recent years but happy to be proven wrong.
 
When it comes to wages which I believe need to be proportionate to income then I don't agree that will will be able to compete in terms of housing a number of players on 150k+. We spunk big cash on transfer fees but we don't ever go that big on wages which is what the real top class players will demand. I've never considered us to be competitive with wage demands in recent years but happy to be proven wrong.

We've got the 9th highest wage bill in world football. 20th highest wage bill in any sport in the world.

http://www.globalsportssalaries.com/GSSS 2014.pdf
 
Wage bill should correlate to position, which means that we should be at least in the last 16 of the CL every year, and if the manager was overperforming we'd be in the semis or whatever.
We are massively underperforming. The finances aren't the issue, it's the use of them.
 
Well more than Atheltico Madrid, Dortmund, Porto, Basel, Bayer Leverkusen, Schalke, Shaktar, all of who are in the last 16 of the CL. Loads more than 4 clubs who are currently above us in the league. But that's just now. The fact that we haven't even been in the 32 teams in the CL for 5 years when we've been in the top 10 rich clubs and top 10 wage payers throughout shows how badly we've been run.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom