"Liverpool fans will go into the summer with memories of special days and nights that will live long in their memories"
That is a fucking atrocious sentence.
That is a fucking atrocious sentence.
"Liverpool fans will go into the summer with memories of special days and nights that will live long in their memories"
That is a fucking atrocious sentence.
"Liverpool fans will go into the summer with memories of special days and nights that will live long in their memories"
That is a fucking atrocious sentence.
There's a fair few people I've spoken to who are well pissed off with the capacity.
Most people were expecting 70k with secondary plans to increase to 100k.
We have 55k with some very sketchy idea on pushing to 59k.
It is underwhelming, there's no escaping it, however I'm of the opinion it was either this or nothing, thanks to both financial & travel infrastructure concerns (they're kinda the one & the same as a ton of cash would circumvent the travel infrastructure problem).
As I outlined earlier, I think we could see a push for the travel infrastructure after this first stage is complete so that when the Anfield road stage is being planned further plans to expand could be pushed through.
The bloke from the Mirror was talking bollocks.
This is what the area should look like if they opened up a 'circle line', which is over 80% built already.
I think the decision to go from a new ground to a redevelopment could cause disappointment but how does anyone realistically expect to overhaul the current stadium into an 80-90k seater in one go?
Current capacity = 45k, so call it 11,250 a stand. We are managing to redevelop one stand to close to double that without meaning we would have a reduced capacity at any point of the next season or two. I think that is positive. AND I think it looks quality as well.
The bollocks about it ruining the Kop is a pointless statement too. If that is a concern then we should either only redevelop that (unlikely tbh and would cause uproar) or just not bother at all.
The article is by Jim Boardman of TAW.
By the way is it true that teres will be no reduction of capacity when the redevelopment is taking place?
The picture on the official site seems to suggest a "phase 2" expansion of the Anfield Rd end (or am I misnterpreting?) :-I think the Main Stand and the Kop are about 12.5k each, Centenary is 11.5k, and Annie Rd about 9.5k.
The Kop would be very difficult and almost certainly uneconomic to extend, so that's a no-go. As are the new stands, obviously. So that leaves the Centenary and possibly the corners at the Anfield Rd end. The Centenary is already high, so you'd probably be looking at a max of 5k on there. The corners might yield about 6k in total.
So the highest it could ever realistically go is about 70k.
I tell you what I always wonder: what is the actual working capacity of Anfield for a PL game? It never seems to hit 45k even for the biggest games. I know there's always some issues, plus a few seats left empty to divide the supporters, but still, would expect higher attendances than we manage.
Anyone know?
Would it have anything to do with the visitors not taking up their full allocation on the day?
The picture on the official site seems to suggest a "phase 2" expansion of the Anfield Rd end (or am I misnterpreting?) :-
Might be wider, but would still have the This is Anfield sign, and probably the steps up to the pitch. A bit of width won't hurt.