• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Sack Klopp

Status
Not open for further replies.
Klopp is one of those managers who tries to do the best he can for players who trying their best, but he has to realise he has to do what's right by the club and fans. In this case selling Klavan. But that will not happen till Jan.We will not buy another DM since we have Kieta.
The club should recruit/poach Burnley's defensive coach he could work under Klopp to make the defence tighter

Don't be silly. We can recruit Sean Dyce and stable 6 players defence in away games but we are not like that?
 
Don't be silly. We can recruit Sean Dyce and stable 6 players defence in away games but we are not like that?

Exactly. I've a lot of respect for what he's done at Burnley but it makes me laugh when pundits moan about British managers like him not getting a chance at bigger clubs. The reason they don't is that they'd have to play a more expansive game, and, if they did, they'd soon find themselves frustrated by the likes of Burnley. If you're primarily a defensive team, fine, but if you're not, it's no good sub-contracting defensive coaching. It's a certain systemic issue.
 
Exactly. I've a lot of respect for what he's done at Burnley but it makes me laugh when pundits moan about British managers like him not getting a chance at bigger clubs. The reason they don't is that they'd have to play a more expansive game, and, if they did, they'd soon find themselves frustrated by the likes of Burnley. If you're primarily a defensive team, fine, but if you're not, it's no good sub-contracting defensive coaching. It's a certain systemic issue.

Fair point and I'm not suggesting you're wrong but those Managers also work within a budget and have to cut their cloth accordingly. It's not like they have a starting 11 full of pace and flair
 
Fair point and I'm not suggesting you're wrong but those Managers also work within a budget and have to cut their cloth accordingly. It's not like they have a starting 11 full of pace and flair

Yeah, I'm not sure I want to get into a Sam Allardycii conversation about British managers getting the big jobs in football, but the idea that a team like Burnley or whoever can even attempt to compete with far more wealthy and talented sides trying to play them at their own game with expansive, free-flowing football is risible and stupid.

They have to find ways of getting a result with what they have, even if - like Pulis, Hodgson, Allardyce, Dyche and whoever - quite often serve up dour, awful football

I think there's an issue with style of play and being a defensive manager, and an expectation of playing a certain way.

Poch at Spurs. Is he defensive? He certainly seems to have very quickly built a very good side that don't concede many

Mourinho is another who ensures his teams are hard to beat, but he's had two Chelsea title winning teams and one at Madrid that also scored a shitload of goals and played some great football

Our most successful modern manager, Benitez, was another who knew that winning trophies requires a miserly and organised defence

You can't win trophies or league titles when you have a defence that concedes over 5o goals a season and until Klopp learns that lesson, we've got no chance
 
Mainwithnoideahesbeenonignoreforages.

I don't give a fuck who has who on ignore.

And I don't have any filter about which post I respond to, or who wrote them. I look at the content not the poster, and if it's interesting or I wish to make a point, I reply

It makes for a more diverting and lively Forum
 
I don't give a fuck who has who on ignore.

And I don't have any filter about which post I respond to, or who wrote them. I look at the content not the poster, and if it's interesting or I wish to make a point, I reply

It makes for a more diverting and lively Forum

Ah come on now you totally look at who posted it, you use your history (amusingly) with most posters to great effect
 
Yeah, I'm not sure I want to get into a Sam Allardycii conversation about British managers getting the big jobs in football, but the idea that a team like Burnley or whoever can even attempt to compete with far more wealthy and talented sides trying to play them at their own game with expansive, free-flowing football is risible and stupid.

They have to find ways of getting a result with what they have, even if - like Pulis, Hodgson, Allardyce, Dyche and whoever - quite often serve up dour, awful football

I think there's an issue with style of play and being a defensive manager, and an expectation of playing a certain way.

Poch at Spurs. Is he defensive? He certainly seems to have very quickly built a very good side that don't concede many

Mourinho is another who ensures his teams are hard to beat, but he's had two Chelsea title winning teams and one at Madrid that also scored a shitload of goals and played some great football

Our most successful modern manager, Benitez, was another who knew that winning trophies requires a miserly and organised defence

You can't win trophies or league titles when you have a defence that concedes over 5o goals a season and until Klopp learns that lesson, we've got no chance
Spot on. One thing those manager all had/have in common is that they built from the back first. Made themselves hard to beat and then focussed on attack. We don't even have a spine to our team yet.
 
The hardest thing to do in football is create chances and score goals. Good attackers cost a LOT of money.

The easiest thing to do in football is sit back and defend. Good defenders don't cost that much money.

Conceding from set pieces is part organisation and part desire (of individual players). Personally, I think we have the organisation (everyone knows their role); we just don't have the desire from the players to win a 1v1 aerial duel, primarily because most of our players are either short or they are pussies (or both). Not having a commanding GK doesn't help too.

Klopp has shown whilst he's here, he can coach a team to attack, create chances and score goals; the hard bit. He's yet to show he can coach a team to defend and see out games (Rafa was good at this bit). The players still show great immaturity and naivety when we are winning games. It's like we have to play at full throttle or we'll look disorganised defending. The players don't seem to know how manage games and take their foot off the pedal.

I really think, with some time, Jurgen will get us organised. I think he will have no choice but to buy defenders and a defensive midfielder come January/Summer. This season will be a wake up call for him. I don't think he's a stupid man incapable of learning and seeing the obvious. I just think he's tried to show (too much) faith with the players who got us to the CL.
 
Last edited:
Did anyone in this thread (except the self-proclaimed "king") actually said Klopp should be sacked? I think the general opinion has been quite the opposite, in spite of everybody's obvious frustration. @RedNinja started this thread to open discussion, not to express his opinion as he made clear in the OP.

yes, there was a lot of "he's shite", "He should go". Which is why I said, in a previous post, I know it was titled as a joke....but some of the comments are brutal.
 
Fucking hell, you fucking crybaby.

The thread was posted with a clear understanding that almost NOBODY wants Klopp sacked. And sure enough, that's what has transpired.

If you can't handle a possible duality of meaning or intent with a thread title, you need to stop your head wobbling.

Take it easy Brendan, the title was meant as a joke, but the comments thereafter talked about him going etc. It seems you are not aware of this *other* duality.
 
Didn't we have a leaky defense last year, but we tightened it up big time?

And didn't we have a debate - is it the dodgy defense, or the lack of midfield cover?
 
No knee jerking here I'm afraid, those who know me know I never wanted him anywhere near the job in the first place. He's pure Keeganball. We could have had Ancelotti and we ended up with this clueless man child, it still kills me now, especially when I see him abusing the MATCH GOING fans for having the temerity to voice their opinion. I can't stand him, and before the super fans go all hysterical about holy trinity and supporting the manager two words, Roy Hodgson.

mate,
  1. He's far better than Keegan, although the defense is more of an issue than before
  2. We didn't have a chance at Ancelotti (zzz)
  3. Man Child? Says the 52 year old to the 46 year old, who both get upset every weekend when not enough balls go in the wrong net? That applies to us all!
  4. We're lucky to have the man, current results withstanding. I'll be holding my powder for a while yet.
 
I'm not sure it's that hard.

All he has to do is buy a new keeper, CB, DM and striker. You could arguably get some of that done in January, say the DM and CB, and that would go a long way to sorting out the defence.

The rest of the team would be transformed by those two additions, and there's little doubt that by Xmas, Klopp's reticence defensively will be set aside, and at least one defender will be coming in.
I mean atm as in if we sack Klopp tomorrow. We have no DM in the squad.
 
Last year, we conceeded

- 9 goals more than the winners, Chelsea
- 16 goals more than Spurs
- 1 more than Man City
- 13 more than Man United (Miserly Mouriniho -but they only scored 54)

So on average, we conceeded about 10 goals too many over our rivals. It's salvageable.

Incidentally, the top 7 is the same on points as it is for goals scored. But not goals against.

If it was based on having the best defense it would be
  1. Spurs
  2. United
  3. Chelsea
  4. City
  5. Liverpool
  6. Everton
  7. Arsenal
 
Last year, we conceeded

- 9 goals more than the winners, Chelsea
- 16 goals more than Spurs
- 1 more than Man City
- 13 more than Man United (Miserly Mouriniho -but they only scored 54)

So on average, we conceeded about 10 goals too many over our rivals. It's salvageable.

Incidentally, the top 7 is the same on points as it is for goals scored. But not goals against.

If it was based on having the best defense it would be
  1. Spurs
  2. United
  3. Chelsea
  4. City
  5. Liverpool
  6. Everton
  7. Arsenal

Salvageable? Yeah, only if we'd obviously strengthened the defence and midfield, or actually improved in our defending.

As it stands there's no cause for optimism, because so far only two clubs in the Premier league have conceded more goals than us, and in all competitions we've already conceded a scarcely believable 16 goals.
 
Salvageable? Yeah, only if we'd obviously strengthened the defence and midfield, or actually improved in our defending.

As it stands there's no cause for optimism, because so far only two clubs in the Premier league have conceded more goals than us, and in all competitions we've already conceded a scarcely believable 16 goals.

For sure, with improvement it's savageable. Not as it stands.

As for the 16, in reality, I'd knock 3 of those off to get a more realistic picture as the city result skewed things. Let's see how it rolls out in the coming weeks before hitting the panic button in full. But yeah, defense needs improving, and I'm sure he will. Eventually.
 
We've conceeded as many as Chelsea, United and City combined in 5 games.
Some feat considering Chelsea conceeded 3 on the first day of the season.
 
Mark is offended by Liverpool fans being positively biased towards Liverpool, on a Liverpool forum.

Does that make Hansern a racist?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom