• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Roma fans

Status
Not open for further replies.
I doubt Dalglish and Rush will pause to stick the finger at their crest next week. They did that on the pitch years ago. It's a club with absolutely no class whatsoever.

I also doubt that Aldo would smile and stick the finger towards Dons Crest either if we met them again, but then as Rush says; These Italians seem to be from a different country.
 
Why anyone likes Roma is beyond me. Fuck them.

The only likeable thing with Roma is De Rossis comments about youth and instagram: "When I see them do live Instagram videos from inside the locker room before a game, I'd like to take a baseball bat to their teeth".

I wouldn´t mind Nainggolan playing for us.
 
Yeah, lecture fucking spionkop69 and everyone else on how to navigate away fixtures in Europe, you massive fucking bellend.

When did I lecture anyway? I merely pointed out my opinion was based on actual experience.

For the record TURIN was way more intimidating.
 
When did I lecture anyway? I merely pointed out my opinion was based on actual experience.

For the record TURIN was way more intimidating.

There is a lot of Serie A games going on in relaxed atmosphere, except for the constant abuse to whichever player has a bit darker skin than anyone else. I have been to a few. But this is a different story. We are true enemies coming to blast them away in their eyes.
 
Holy fuck - look at this shit (https://www.express.co.uk/sport/foo...on-Roma-violence-Colin-Mafham-Sunderland-news)

Liverpool must take serious action after Roma violence or risk further trouble - MAFHAM

COLIN MAFHAM urges Liverpool Football Club to condemn the thug fans who shame them - and the country.

I have no wish to rain on Liverpool's parade here. The 5-2 demolition of Roma was often spellbinding, and worthy of winning the Champions League on its own.
But it's not the players who produced that performance who I have an issue with, it's some of the people who 'follow' them that frighten the living daylights out of me.
You would have thought the deaths of 39 Italians at the European Cup final Liverpool lost to Juventus in 1985 - plus the five year ban on English clubs that consequently came after that - would have had a sobering effect.
You would have thought the horrors at Hillsborough and 96 more deaths that followed only four years later would have made everyone more aware of their responsibilities to each other.
Those two tragedies, in which the central figures were sadly mostly from Liverpool, are arguably football's most painful Achilles and hopefully will never happen again.
So why do I fear that the latest generation of that club's supporters could well add another chapter to England's footballing book of condolences?

Liverpool fans once again found themselves in trouble before the match against Roma

The club needs to recognise it has a big problem - and has had for some years - and proactively support and work with those whose job it is to preserve law and order.
We know where the empty bottles came from, but where the heck did they get those fire flares that were thrown at the Manchester City and Roma team buses? You couldn't bring them through customs the last time I looked.
And why is a 53-year-old man now seemingly fighting for his life, and two Italians being held on suspicion of attempted murder, before a football match involving Liverpool?
When you have a team capable of playing the joyous football Liverpool have for most of this season how on earth are their fans always seemingly involved in such horrific altercations on big European nights.
Why does trouble seem to follow them like bees round a honey pot?
No one is suggesting that the violence that erupted on Tuesday night was solely the fault of Liverpool fans. Their visitors from Rome were clearly just as thuggish, and just as frightening.
But there are suggestions that the reputation of Liverpool supporters had gone before them and Roman yobs had simply decided to get in first, and with such awful consequences. It's not right, but it does again highlight a common denominator.
Liverpool fans have developed an unwanted reputation over the years
All of this is a crying shame because what Jurgen Klopp has produced at Anfield is a team - and I mean a real team here - of super talents that are worthy challengers for the crown that Manchester City have just donned. But without any of the accompanying trouble.
That's why I urge Liverpool Football Club to condemn, rather than giving succour to excuses like "it's society's problem" and "all the world's against us."
The club needs to recognise it has a big problem - and has had for some years - and proactively support and work with those whose job it is to preserve law and order.
If they don't then there is a very real danger that revenge will be sought by both sides when they meet in Rome for the second leg on May 2, and all hell could break loose again.
And if that happens we will all be losers, on and off the field.

What a massive cunt.
 
I bet the twat will now adopt the classic MacKenzie strategy and complain about being threatened and abused by Liverpool fans ('See what I mean? They're all MAD!'). It's quite amazing, these fools who seem to think they have rights but no responsibilities, so they write crap like this and then immediately think they're the victims because of the reaction it provokes.
 
Very weird that Express would print the article in the first Place With those horrendous references. Where is the Chief editor? What kind of publication is this?
 
I believe the Express has since removed the article. Mafham used to work for The S*n, which will surprise no one.

Utterly shit article.
He'd do well to realise that a major reason for Heysel in '85 was because of Roma in '84.
Cunto.
 
Holy fuck - look at this shit (https://www.express.co.uk/sport/foo...on-Roma-violence-Colin-Mafham-Sunderland-news)

Liverpool must take serious action after Roma violence or risk further trouble - MAFHAM

COLIN MAFHAM urges Liverpool Football Club to condemn the thug fans who shame them - and the country.

I have no wish to rain on Liverpool's parade here. The 5-2 demolition of Roma was often spellbinding, and worthy of winning the Champions League on its own.
But it's not the players who produced that performance who I have an issue with, it's some of the people who 'follow' them that frighten the living daylights out of me.
You would have thought the deaths of 39 Italians at the European Cup final Liverpool lost to Juventus in 1985 - plus the five year ban on English clubs that consequently came after that - would have had a sobering effect.
You would have thought the horrors at Hillsborough and 96 more deaths that followed only four years later would have made everyone more aware of their responsibilities to each other.
Those two tragedies, in which the central figures were sadly mostly from Liverpool, are arguably football's most painful Achilles and hopefully will never happen again.
So why do I fear that the latest generation of that club's supporters could well add another chapter to England's footballing book of condolences?

Liverpool fans once again found themselves in trouble before the match against Roma

The club needs to recognise it has a big problem - and has had for some years - and proactively support and work with those whose job it is to preserve law and order.
We know where the empty bottles came from, but where the heck did they get those fire flares that were thrown at the Manchester City and Roma team buses? You couldn't bring them through customs the last time I looked.
And why is a 53-year-old man now seemingly fighting for his life, and two Italians being held on suspicion of attempted murder, before a football match involving Liverpool?
When you have a team capable of playing the joyous football Liverpool have for most of this season how on earth are their fans always seemingly involved in such horrific altercations on big European nights.
Why does trouble seem to follow them like bees round a honey pot?
No one is suggesting that the violence that erupted on Tuesday night was solely the fault of Liverpool fans. Their visitors from Rome were clearly just as thuggish, and just as frightening.
But there are suggestions that the reputation of Liverpool supporters had gone before them and Roman yobs had simply decided to get in first, and with such awful consequences. It's not right, but it does again highlight a common denominator.
Liverpool fans have developed an unwanted reputation over the years
All of this is a crying shame because what Jurgen Klopp has produced at Anfield is a team - and I mean a real team here - of super talents that are worthy challengers for the crown that Manchester City have just donned. But without any of the accompanying trouble.
That's why I urge Liverpool Football Club to condemn, rather than giving succour to excuses like "it's society's problem" and "all the world's against us."
The club needs to recognise it has a big problem - and has had for some years - and proactively support and work with those whose job it is to preserve law and order.
If they don't then there is a very real danger that revenge will be sought by both sides when they meet in Rome for the second leg on May 2, and all hell could break loose again.
And if that happens we will all be losers, on and off the field.
Its really tiring reading this kind of shit, in particular that Hillsborough reference (you think we would learn) and its inference.

Why does these fucking pond dwellers not start blaming United for Munich? Or the landlord of the world trade for 9/11? Why arent commuters blamed for the fire at Kings Cross? Or rape victims blamed for being raped..........oh
 
Liverpool fans and Football Club: Our apology

Yesterday a comment piece by a freelance journalist entitled 'Liverpool must take serious action after Roma violence or risk further trouble' was published on this website.

951793_1.jpg

Liverpool fans and Football Club: Our apology

This article was ill-informed and wrong. It did not, in any way, reflect the views of the Express. It should never have been written and was very quickly removed.

We unconditionally apologise, both for the article itself and any offence, understandably, caused.
The journalist who wrote the piece was immediately suspended.

Express.co.uk is conducting an inquiry into how the article came to be published on our website.
 
Not sure about that apology. It seems the article was first edited to remove references to Heysel and Hillsborough, and then later taken down.
 
Liverpool fans and Football Club: Our apology

Yesterday a comment piece by a freelance journalist entitled 'Liverpool must take serious action after Roma violence or risk further trouble' was published on this website.

951793_1.jpg

Liverpool fans and Football Club: Our apology

This article was ill-informed and wrong. It did not, in any way, reflect the views of the Express. It should never have been written and was very quickly removed.

We unconditionally apologise, both for the article itself and any offence, understandably, caused.
The journalist who wrote the piece was immediately suspended.

Express.co.uk is conducting an inquiry into how the article came to be published on our website.
Fair enough.
 
Liverpool have requested an "extraordinary meeting" amid security fears over the Champions League semi-final second leg in Rome on Wednesday.
The Reds beat Roma 5-2 in Tuesday's first leg at Anfield, but Liverpool fan Sean Cox is in a critical condition after being injured by Italian fans.
The club have sold the 5,000 tickets they were allocated at Stadio Olimpico.
But police have warned Liverpool fans without a ticket for the match not to travel to the Italian capital.
It is believed the Premier League club have been left frustrated by the process of getting basic and essential information about arrangements for the game on 2 May.
Liverpool's issue is with the Italian authorities rather than Uefa or Roma, who have been working with the Merseyside club.
Reds officials are willing to supply additional funding in order to ensure there is a secure shuttle service for supporters to and from the ground for the 19:45 BST kick-off.
They want clarity on what time supporters can arrive at the ground, ticket and baggage procedures and access out of the stadium after the game.
Liverpool also want to know which areas should be avoided by their fans and what routes to the stadium are the safest if they are unable to use the shuttle.
Liverpool will meet with "major stakeholders who share responsibility for the wellbeing of supporters" on Friday in Rome, including officials from Roma, Uefa and the Italian police and security services.
"Liverpool Football Club is continuing to do everything in its power to provide supporters travelling to Rome next week with the most comprehensive safety and security advice," Liverpool said in a statement.
"Liverpool have sought clarity on a number of issues surrounding the matchday operation since the draw was made and is hoping this extraordinary meeting will provide the necessary reassurances and essential information.
"This, if provided, will allow the club to fully inform supporters of the measures that will be in place."
Merseyside Police is also working with Italian police and will have officers at the game.
Chief superintendent Dave Charnock added: "While we understand and appreciate that many Liverpool fans will want to travel to Rome, I would encourage fans who do not have tickets to not travel."
Roma instructed Liverpool to print the name of each supporter attending on their official ticket.
It means fans will be rejected entry to the 72,698-capacity stadium if details on their ticket and passport do not match.
"Fans who are travelling with tickets are encouraged to monitor official fan advice on the club's official website and social media feeds for information to assist their visit," added Charnock.
"And as ever, given the vigilance of police and security around the stadium, we would encourage fans to arrive in plenty of time to enjoy the atmosphere."
 
That article was fucked up...

So that poor fella who got his head kicked in by the pub somehow deserved it did he?

What a fucking cunt of a writer would write that... And all of hooliganism both home and abroad it seems is completely Liverpool's fault because of Heysel clearly... and Hillsborough was our comeuppance for that eh...

So... some dickheads throwing beer cans at a bus and using flares is on a par with turning up in a hoodlum gang and beating some fella up so badly that he is put in hospital in a critical condition is it... wow... just fucking wow...

It is good to see that the Express acted quickly and apologized but that guy should not be suspended he should just not get the opportunity to write for the paper again... what a fucking cunt.
 
And I hope that Sean Cox pulls through OK and this kind of shit stops happening... If any of you's have got tickets for Rome keep an eye out for yourselves and stay safe.

As for the dickheads who did throw beer cans at the bus... be aware that your drunken stupidity has hereby given many total fucking pricks ammunition to point the finger at us and our club yet again, seemingly even when totally innocent fans have been hurt by scumbags it's still somehow our fault... ffs...

I wish I'd never read that article...

I just read a comment under a newspaper article blaming the Liverpool police... not the violent Roma scumbags but the police because they didn't stop it and the attack was encouraged by some idiots attacking the city bus.... fucking hell...

C'mon Sean... get well...
 
It is good to see that the Express acted quickly and apologized but that guy should not be suspended he should just not get the opportunity to write for the paper again... what a fucking cunt.
They did the right thing in the end, but it took time & the editorial staff were not innocent as they seem to make out. First they edited the article to remove reference to Heysel and Hillsborough, presumably as a result of the initial outrage in an attempt to make it more palatable, then they took it down ... then they apologised. Overall it took the best part of a day to get to that point
 
They did the right thing in the end, but it took time & the editorial staff were not innocent as they seem to make out. First they edited the article to remove reference to Heysel and Hillsborough, presumably as a result of the initial outrage in an attempt to make it more palatable, then they took it down ... then they apologised. Overall it took the best part of a day to get to that point

Editing away those references and the article contains 2 sentences only.

It is the Chief editor that is responsible for all written there. He is the right adress for shit on this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom