This^I don't care whether he's sacked or not, just please god please I hope we see something different in terms of formation on Thursday.
Who else was available at the time that Rodgers et al were being "interviewed"?
Rafael BenitezWho else was available at the time that Rodgers et al were being "interviewed"?
This^
I'd just like to see the swashbuckling Liverpool of 2 seasons ago. This constant Rodgers berating kinda makes SCM shit.
Just 3 likes!!!???
Put those teeth away, monsieur - they are blending me!
And the bitching on a Rodgers moan that always follows is also meh.110%. Lost to the moaners. Same piss again and again. They find some sort of comfort in repeating the message to whom ever might share their opinion or listen to them.
I went through the same process with Gerrard.
AvB he was availableCue some idiot saying Rafa.
110%. Lost to the moaners. Same piss again and again. They find some sort of comfort in repeating the message to whom ever might share their opinion or listen to them.
I went through the same process with Gerrard.
It won't reflect well on the club if it is seen to continue to accept failure. Top managers don't want to be indulged in mediocrity. They want to win. So it might put off medicore managers looking for a comfortable job, but not managers with appetite and experience and an impatience to win.
So what's the threshold? We haven't seen any convincing football over more than 45 minutes for over a season. We haven't seen a decent coherent transfer policy at all since he came in. In all the time he's been here he hasn't set up a defence properly bar a run last season that destroyed our creativity & attacking verve in the process of keeping clean sheets at all costs, even then the defence didn't look solid, despite the results saying otherwise for a short period.It just makes no sense calling for the managers head at this stage. It's ludicrous. You have to be a huge fucking moron to make any sense of that approach. You really think a club like LFC would benefit from a decision like that? Seriously? How do you think it would reflect on LFC and affect the chances of landing good managers in the future if we back a manager to the hilt and then fire him 5 matches in? How little perspective are you allowed to have? How interesting can any dialogue when you guys have this dead on/Hard on approach to such a complex subject? The decision to keep Rodgers have been made and you want to fire him after 5 matches - Fucking assholes and complete wankers the lot of you. Get behind the club or go support City or Barcalona - they rarely lose and win titles - much easier for you.
You need to man the fuck up or the "dead m(o)an walking" will close this site or at the very least leave it on suicide watch.
So what's the threshold? We haven't seen any convincing football over more than 45 minutes for over a season. We haven't seen a decent coherent transfer policy at all since he came in. In all the time he's been here he hasn't set up a defence properly bar a run last season that destroyed our creativity & attacking verve in the process of keeping clean sheets at all costs, even then the defence didn't look solid, despite the results saying otherwise for a short period.
You know what, if we'd have gone down 3-1 to Utd playing boss footy it would have been different. This isn't just about results, it's about performance, or the lack of it.
In that respect, both Rodgers & the players in his charge are being found sadly lacking.
Enough is enough.
This isn't a reaction after just five games though!
Exactly.
Wiberg, you're a sensible poster normally but you need to get over yourself on this one. There's been a looooooong build-up to the fans' (not just 6CM's) disenchantment with the manager, and some of us who have reluctantly decided that he isn't up to the job have waited for a VERY long time before finally being persuaded by the sheer weight of evidence.
I agree, but it's a new start so you have to be patient. FSG chose to back him so they have to give him time. It's hard for any of us to support Brendan right now. He is making more bad decisions than Napoleon at Waterloo and we look awful or worse. But the moment you are trying to build a case for him to be axed right now, that's when you lost the plot. It's not time yet. You know this. Macca knows it. You been around the Block...with the Fat Lady while she was singing.....you know what I mean.
I'm not calling for his head. But things are looking bleak. We can't afford to let this continue until Xmas.It just makes no sense calling for the managers head at this stage. It's ludicrous. You have to be a huge fucking moron to make any sense of that approach. You really think a club like LFC would benefit from a decision like that? Seriously? How do you think it would reflect on LFC and affect the chances of landing good managers in the future if we back a manager to the hilt and then fire him 5 matches in? How little perspective are you allowed to have? How interesting can any dialogue when you guys have this dead on/Hard on approach to such a complex subject? The decision to keep Rodgers have been made and you want to fire him after 5 matches - Fucking assholes and complete wankers the lot of you. Get behind the club or go support City or Barcalona - they rarely lose and win titles - much easier for you.
You need to man the fuck up or the "dead m(o)an walking" will close this site or at the very least leave it on suicide watch.
Your point further up the thread about it being 5 games in cuts no ice. It's since he arrived. Your point about the best footy since 88 in 13/14 doesn't hold much water either. The front 3 brought us that. Lest you forget, we shipped goals like an Albanian third division team in the champions league. Guess what, we still concede at more or less exactly the same rate. He was a coward in letting his staff take the blame for him in the summer, whats his excuses since? Can't really have been much to do with them now can it? Do we think the club have hired another couple of crap coaches in Mcallister and the other guy ( name escapes me at the mo )? I very much doubt it. No, there is one constant through all of this crap, and we all know who it is. You say firing the manager this early would make us look bad, I feel it would make us look as though we are focussed on getting things back to where we believe they ought to be, and that we won't suffer this ridiculous self indulgence any longer.
I kinda agree with half of that and completely disagree with the rest. You can't knock him for our flaws and then decide to deprive him of what qualities saw us go on a great spell for 18 months. "That front three" consisted of Suarez (granted) , Sturridge (who he bought) and Sterling (who he was brave enough to put faith in at an early age). It's also completely ignoring that a fulcrum in that set up was Coutinho, who he also bought.
The one constant through all of this crap is poor defensive discipline, which is down to Rodgers, the point about 13/14 (and the previous 5-6 months I might add) holding no water errrr, holds no water, because when we played at our best it was his system working at it's best with two fundamental parts who were his players and one kid who he had the balls to throw into the side. Depriving him of any acknowledgement for that is selective at best.
We've been shite for the best part of a year now, but let's not rewrite history.
Do you think it's working Mark? Yes or no?
Ah yes, I missed that bit. No point getting rid if no replacement of note is available straight away.Unless we get someone worth sacking him for, and I'm not sure Klopp is the answer, then I don't see the point in acting for the sake of it. If we sack him and then start sniffing around someone like Gary Monk, then I really do lose all hope. If we want to be a big club again and we're willing to sack him to get closer to that, then we have to bring in someone with a track record and with experience, anything else is another patience sapping endurance job.
They're excellent points.No mate, I really don't. People think I'm blindly defending him, I'm really not. It's not working because when the attack doesn't work, our defense is too unreliable to scrape results, no arguments from me there, it's been the same throughout his tenure. I'm just not having it that we can blame him entirely square on for our faults, but any good he has done - and it wasn't a mere lucky spell, it was 18 sodding months (half his tenure), are down to variables out of his control. It's selective and biased.
Like I say, he could have no arguments if we continue this way and he gets the boot.