[quote author=Farkmaster link=topic=41447.msg1155223#msg1155223 date=1281902186]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=41447.msg1155221#msg1155221 date=1281901992]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=41447.msg1155191#msg1155191 date=1281898646]
All the back four did well, Masher was very good, eggnog was dismal at times, but scored a belter
Everyone else was 'ok'
[/quote]
Bren, you had to be happy with the lineup and the way Roy has generally gone about things?
No Lucas, no Aqua, no Insua, a striker for a striker despite being a man down. All in all, I thought it was promising and a good sign of things to come. And despite N'Gog, he scored a good goal and generally filled in well.
[/quote]
It was promising in the belief shown, but not particularly in the play. We didn't play particularly good football at any point, did we? And the best aspects of our play were defensive. That's hardly a phase change.
Biggest difference is a bit of energy in Anfield and the players not moping feeling sorry for themselves.
[/quote]
Yeah, I was disappointed with how negative we were in the first half. Hodgson's comments (and our approach in the second half) suggest that he was too, and that our extreme cautiousness maybe had more to do with nerves than with any particular gameplan.
I also liked the fact that Torres came on fairly early, despite the fact we were still leading, and that we didn't stop attacking even after they scored. However, I would really like him to pick Aurelio at LB, rather than Agger.
I expect us to be fairly cautious away at City, and we've always gone for it at home against the weaker sides, so the first real test of how Roy might differ from Rafa as a manager will be Birmingham away. We were dismal in that fixture last season. I hope and believe that Hodgson will send us out to win it rather than nullifying a team set on nullifying us for 80 mins, then increasing the pace in the last 10.