Yeah, if you want to measure it in annoyance I guess you're right. Well done.
OK, well you know how I love to use actual facts and stuff, so here goes!
In the United Match thread yesterday, I made c.56 posts. The vast majority were the usual "That was close!" or "Horrible tackle" three or four word posts.
Within those 56 posts, I mentioned Firmino a grand total of
twice.
The only person instigating any pointless abuse or personal attacks was Leo, who called me a cunt a few times, was warned for it and duly stopped. I made a couple of less than optimistic posts along the lines of "it is highly unlikely that we won't concede". We duly concede.
So in summary: I got the match team right and shared that the night before; Firmino was mentioned in 1% of my total posts; I instigated and participated in zero arguments; I abused nobody; and the only prediction I made about the result was correct.
I'm not sure what more anyone could ask for in a Match Thread!
What appears to be happening is a strange, localised, core of sad, angry, hypocritical posters , employing confirmation bias and hypocrisy to persuade themselves something is happening that actually isn't.
It would seem to have its roots in the first lot of Firmino posts when I questioned the goalscoring quality of the player, and presented the interesting hypothesis - backed by actual facts - about Champions and top scorers, which then led to a fascinating debate about "matchwinners" and "clinical finishing".
Firmino was the lightning rod, and when first presented, every goal he scored was used by four or five amusingly irate posters to jump up and down and point and laugh, "yeah, silly Brendan!" etc etc. Most tiresome. However, the period after, in which there has been a downturn in his form, and a pitiful ONE goal in 12 games, only seems to have made this group almost apoplectic with rage, as if me being right and/or having a valid point was somehow a direct slur on them, as opposed to something almost entirely predictable.
It's quite interesting, but as usual reflects poorly on most of those involved.