Hehehe yep. I shared that one in a group chat. It's a beautyI'm not one for viewing other clubs' forum page so apologise this comment isn't from one but found it hilarious nonetheless.
Other forum meltdown watch 24/25
- Thread starter MomoWASright
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Yes, but denial of a goal-scoring opportunity is what clicks this all into motion, and if a goal is scored, all bets are off- rightly or wrongly, that has always been the case in these scenarios. Think about Garcia's ghost goal as that ultimate example. Cech smashes into Baros which would have been a red card and peno but Luis Garcia's goal saves that eventuality. This has always been the way.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzQv7kQkUY0
Everton supporters are saying, are you joking, hold my fucking beer, I got this.I'm not one for viewing other clubs' forum page so apologise this comment isn't from one but found it hilarious nonetheless.
I get this but anywhere else on the pitch, the ref pulls it back after the advantage was given. But in this case we don't know what would have happened because the ref didn't even give the foul anyway.
Yes, he signalled no foul immediately before Nunez popped it in. The fucking idiot.
There's something in the water in London that makes their fans stupidly dramaticThe
Oh yeah, I just meant had Nunez blazed it over the bar, which we all expected.😁
Oh yeah, I just meant had Nunez blazed it over the bar, which we all expected.😁
Not sure about that. Virtually every commentator / pundit I saw after the game mentioned the double jeopardy, you haven't denied a goal-scoring opportunity if we scored from that play. So a yellow.
What was the match, two seasons ago, where Diaz scored a header from the edge of the area & the keeper wiped him out. He wasn't sent off, but most pundits then were saying he should have been ... I don't think anyone was using the double jeopardy argument then.
In my simple world, all fouls should be punished in the same way, regardless of what happens afterwards ...
In my simple world, all fouls should be punished in the same way, regardless of what happens afterwards ...
Dangerous play is judged differently though, so that example wouldn't apply to the Salah incident.
Yes, the action did not prevent a goal scoring opportunity.
This.
We were taking after the game about how there should be more (official) standard signals from refs as in cricket so you know what their decision is. In the case of advantage, refs usually hold both hands out, palms up in front of their hips to indicate they’re playing advantage. In this case, Coote crossed his hands over to indicate he thought there was no foul. So it was clear, in-play, what his decision was. Even disagreeing with his assessment, his judgment was at least clear. Both of these gestures are commonly used so players know where they stand.
Of course in this case there was the added jeopardy that VAR might alter the picture if we hadn’t scored, which is where the ghost goal incident is different because it would still have been the ref’s call. And I still think Chelsea got a huge advantage in that game from that goal. Down to 10 men, Cech off the pitch and a penalty likely scored they would not have still been in the tie until the final whistle.
Of course in this case there was the added jeopardy that VAR might alter the picture if we hadn’t scored, which is where the ghost goal incident is different because it would still have been the ref’s call. And I still think Chelsea got a huge advantage in that game from that goal. Down to 10 men, Cech off the pitch and a penalty likely scored they would not have still been in the tie until the final whistle.
What's crazy about the City meltdown is no one mentions its a conspiracy against them anymore.
Like it went from the world was against them to nothing.
Almost like an admittance that they've had their own way for years, with the 115 charges, the financial fuckery, Coote video etc
Like it went from the world was against them to nothing.
Almost like an admittance that they've had their own way for years, with the 115 charges, the financial fuckery, Coote video etc
I'd be amazed if Blue Moon isn't still full of conspiracy bollocks.
Is the Russian ref still alive or did Chelsea's then owner get his mates to visit him after the game ?
He would be fairly old and probably dead as he was linesman in the 1966 cup final
Tonight’s fumage is sponsored by Northern Monk’s Worlds away. A hazy ale which was recommended by the good Doc.
I like the guy who is hunting out his old Chelsea top. They'll be a right few of those'uns.
How can a team be so dependent on one player. Is Rodri so amazing?
It’s been coming. Myself (and others) could see it. Like us over Klopp’s final few seasons they’ve let some players get too old and those who they’ve brought in aren’t of the quality needed to be challengers.
No Dias, No Rodri and a KDB who's ghosting in the background being left on the bench most games. That's your 3 best players right there. Them letting go Alvaraz and not replacing was a bit strange too......other than Haaland there's no one there getting goals.
You saw us in 09 after Xabi and Nando left, then again when Suarez left.
It’s been both Rodri & KDB out tbf. But who knows what is going wrong. I never watch their games unless it’s against us so can’t offer much comment.
I'm sure you know it's not just one player.
For the record they were able to buy multiple 'best of' players per position before restrictions but as the rules have tightened over time they have had to join in the same roulette every other club has had to suffer. Their recent signings have been average which is making them mortal. They are a million miles away from being us in the 99/00 or united for the last 10 years, but they are mortal
yea exactly this, they used to take so many shots at filling a position and just move the rejects on quickly. fullback used to be a joke.
tons of the players guardiola has built this team around were transfer record level prices at the time but the figures have aged well to disguise this a little.
gutted for them
