Nicola Cortese is the chairman of Southampton. Hold on to that fact because in the age of the owner-manager it is easy to become confused. Cortese has spent the last week holding his club, the club he runs, to ransom.
There have been veiled threats, there have been carefully floated ultimatums, there has been disruption and wild talk of disintegration. Not from his lips, obviously, but informed sources. Nothing was ever denied and in the end, he got what he wanted.
If Cortese were Wayne Rooney or Harry Redknapp, a figure from the sweaty end of football’s market place, he would no doubt have been pilloried. As he wears a suit, his brinkmanship passes without comment.
Meanwhile, over at Manchester City, a rather tawdry smear campaign against Roberto Mancini is being used to realign the position of incoming coach Manuel Pellegrini. The so-called holistic approach is merely just an old-fashioned grab for power by the executives. The owner-manager age is reaching its logical conclusion.
They think they are players, these guys. Literally and metaphorically. It is always about Cortese at Southampton. When he grants an interview he rarely mentions the manager and if he is beginning to talk up the work of Mauricio Pochettino, it is only because his appointment in controversial circumstances was so plainly Cortese’s call that he basks in any reflected glory.
After a week of confusion, Cortese’s decision to stay at Southampton, announced on Saturday, was depicted as having prevented a mass walk-out.
Quite where everyone was going to walk to, considering manager and players are under contract and Cortese doesn’t own a football club, is a mystery. Cortese’s great talent is for spending another man’s fortune. Most owners, from Roman Abramovich to Tony Fernandes, are capable of doing that themselves.
The benefactor at Southampton was the late Markus Liebherr who, having bought the club and employed Cortese as chairman, died in 2011. Southampton is now in the hands of the Liebherr Trust, run by Katharina Liebherr, and she has allowed Cortese to continue with a generous budget.
Here the conflict lies. Cortese is an ambitious man. Ambition costs money in the Premier League. Liebherr Trust money.
Katharina did not appear to share Cortese’s enthusiasm for spending her father’s bequest. So Cortese played up, just as a manager would. Stories began appearing that he would quit.
Then Pochettino said he would go with him. Morgan Schneiderlin spoke for the players, claiming many would consider their future. The fans were certainly on Cortese’s side because fans always want their club to spend.
Yet it is very easy to be big-hearted Charlie with another man’s money. By acting like a manager, Southampton’s chairman only shines light on the real hero here: Katharina Liebherr.
Nobody sings her name, yet what is Cortese without her? He’s a guy playing fantasy football. Where does this owner-manager tendency end? Will chairmen start demanding showdown talks with themselves?
Telling themselves: back me or I quit? Maybe in times of crisis a chairman will give himself a vote of confidence — and sack himself two days later. We wish.
Yet if Cortese sees himself only as an employee, not the custodian, what happens when Southampton hit that inevitable glass ceiling? Does he agitate for a move to a bigger club, as a manager might? Is Southampton just his stepping stone?
Chelsea are increasingly convinced they will sign Southampton’s most exciting prospect, left back Luke Shaw. Did this week of upheaval play a part? It can hardly have helped, if Shaw was pondering his future, to hear that half the club, from the chairman down, was doing the same.
Yet the owner-manager phenomenon is spreading. It is not just owners who want to run the club these days.
There is a middle raft of executives — Cortese at Southampton, Daniel Levy at Tottenham Hotspur and the former Barcelona pair Txiki Begiristain and Ferran Soriano freshly installed at Manchester City — who are seizing their moment.
At City, the trashing of Mancini’s reputation — he even took out a full page ad in the Manchester Evening News to thank the fans, the rotter — is merely a smokescreen.
It is being used to usher in a change of approach that will, ostensibly, guard against another tyrannical reign. In reality, Begiristain and Soriano are expanding their empires. Pellegrini will dance to their tune.
There is already talk of Pellegrini grooming Patrick Vieira to be manager, long-term. He hasn’t turned up yet and they are already counting down to when he can go.
Who is Begiristain grooming to be director of football, by the way?
Isn’t it strange that, however important these executive roles are made to appear, it is only the manager who must plan to be shunted aside.
The director of football wants to be judged in 10 years; the manager gets 10 games.
David Moyes has been given a six-year contract at Manchester United, Pellegrini is likely to receive one third of that at Manchester City.
Now which club is truly taking a holistic approach?
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...oment-clubs--MARTIN-SAMUEL.html#ixzz3UPnelM8W
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter |
DailyMail on Facebook